1848 U.S. Presidential Election
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 04:48:48 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  1848 U.S. Presidential Election
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: Who?
#1
Senator Charles F. Adams (Union-Massachusetts)/Congressman Gerrit Smith (Union-New York)
 
#2
Mayor Joseph Smith (Manifest-Illinois)/Former Member of the MA House of Representatives George T. Curtis (Manifest-Massachusetts)
 
#3
Congressman Andrew Jackson Donelson (Redeemer-Tennessee)/Governor Garrett Davis (Redeemer-Kentucky)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 44

Author Topic: 1848 U.S. Presidential Election  (Read 1442 times)
Zioneer
PioneerProgress
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: December 17, 2013, 01:18:22 AM »

About one more day to go on this if you wanna vote.

Should it go to a second round if nobody wins 50%, since that would indicate a potential split Electoral College?

In RL, we've had election winners with like 39% of the vote. In theory, the Union party could be easily carried to victory thanks to their strength in the East, an advantage their opposition lacks.

Then I repeat, dang Redeemers.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,224
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: December 17, 2013, 06:17:28 AM »

If we get enough Smithmentum today we can probably peel off enough Redeemers to win in the House - maybe a Smith/Davis unity ticket?
Logged
Cassius
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,625


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: December 17, 2013, 09:05:46 AM »

The Redeemers will obviously do well in the south, but the north, a straight fight between Adams and SMith, will probably be an Adams landslide. So I'd imagine Adams comes away with a fairly comfortable win.
Logged
Zioneer
PioneerProgress
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: December 17, 2013, 06:43:18 PM »

If we get enough Smithmentum today we can probably peel off enough Redeemers to win in the House - maybe a Smith/Davis unity ticket?

Too bad the forum software doesn't allow for that.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,224
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: December 17, 2013, 07:41:56 PM »

If we get enough Smithmentum today we can probably peel off enough Redeemers to win in the House - maybe a Smith/Davis unity ticket?

Too bad the forum software doesn't allow for that.

No, I was thinking during the hypothetical House vote that would occur as a result of a deluge of Smith votes coming in in the next fifteen minutes or so.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,355
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: December 20, 2013, 12:26:03 PM »

The 1848 United States Presidential Election
It would come to be said that 1840 was the height of the Union Party's strength. With full support for the war effort behind it, Martin Van Buren had cruised to easy victory over a split opposition. In 1844, the same man would win only a bare majority over Joseph Smith and Francis Preston Blair, Sr. However, by 1848, it appeared the party's dominance was on the wane. Even with party stalwart Charles Francis Adams being as popular as he was with the party at-large, the nation was looking for a change. While Union campaign strategists saw both Smith and Donelson as particularly weak contenders, their combined strength would be enough to keep Adams to only a plurality. With the Upper South wanting a change in its favor and an end to the massive presence of soldiers on their borders, and with the sparsely populated Western states agitating heavily for expansion, a simple rerun of the last four years was not enough for a majority of the country. It didn't help that radical Gerrit Smith had been nominated for Vice President. Nevertheless, with Adams reaching out to moderate expansionists, and having heavy Eastern backing, he won an electoral majority and presided over another four years of Union party dominance.

Senator Charles Francis Adams (Union-Massachusetts)/Congressman Gerrit Smith (Union-New York) 167 electoral votes, 43.2% of the popular vote
Mayor Joseph Smith (Manifest-Illinois)/Former Member of the MA House of Representatives George T. Curtis (Manifest-Massachusetts) 63 electoral votes, 34.1% of the popular vote
Congressman Andrew Jackson Donelson (Redeemer-Tennessee)/Governor Garrett Davis (Redeemer-Kentucky) 56 electoral votes, 22.7% of the popular vote
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 13 queries.