Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 20, 2019, 05:21:55 pm
News: 2019 Gubernatorial Predictions are now active

  Atlas Forum
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls (Moderators: AndrewTX, Likely Voter)
  PA-Quinnipiac: Clinton leads Christie by 1, destroys other Republicans
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: PA-Quinnipiac: Clinton leads Christie by 1, destroys other Republicans  (Read 1624 times)
JRP1994
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1,646


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 19, 2013, 12:11:07 pm »

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes-and-centers/polling-institute/pennsylvania/release-detail?ReleaseID=1992

Clinton 44, Christie 43
Clinton 52, Paul 40
Clinton 51, Santorum 38
Clinton 52, Bush 36
Clinton 54, Cruz 36
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 50,345
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 19, 2013, 12:19:00 pm »



304 Clinton
234 Christie

Clinton "easily" wins the EC because of PennsylFlOhio and the 90s Clinton coalition in the Deep South.
Logged
WeAreDoomed
outofbox6
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,683
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 19, 2013, 12:55:28 pm »

PPP had less undecideds, so don't jump for joy yet Democrats.
Logged
opebo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 47,070


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 19, 2013, 01:06:33 pm »

PPP had less undecideds, so don't jump for joy yet Democrats.

PA going R is bandied about every election.  Hasn't happened in ages.  I'm not worried.
Logged
Invisible Obama
DrScholl
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9,901
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 19, 2013, 02:34:55 pm »

If he's not winning Pennsylvania at his peak, then he's not likely to win it almost three years from now.
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6,575
Spain


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 19, 2013, 03:03:45 pm »



304 Clinton
234 Christie

Clinton "easily" wins the EC because of PennsylFlOhio and the 90s Clinton coalition in the Deep South.

I'd paint PA as a toss-up or blue. Christie was leading in PPP's poll.
Logged
Snowstalker's Last Stand
Snowstalker
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19,308
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 19, 2013, 03:16:17 pm »

I'd actually be curious as to how California is looking like re: Clinton vs. Christie.
Logged
Bevinevitable
IceSpear
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31,511
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 19, 2013, 04:52:59 pm »

Christie has essentially had a campaign and tons of free positive publicity all throughout SE PA due to the overlapping media market. In contrast, Hillary has not even announced a campaign. This will be Christie's peak.
Logged
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 52,667


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 19, 2013, 10:33:29 pm »

"Hillary has not announced her campaign" so people must have put their absolute adoration of her on hold for these polls. Mmmmhmmmm. The spin these days, boy, I'll tell you...
Logged
Lief 🐋
Lief
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 40,599
Dominica


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 20, 2013, 07:19:07 pm »



304 Clinton
234 Christie

Clinton "easily" wins the EC because of PennsylFlOhio and the 90s Clinton coalition in the Deep South.

Looks like Hildawg is dominating. Excellent news.
Logged
#StillWithBeto
semocrat08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,470
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 21, 2013, 02:25:53 am »

Pennsylvania going red/Atlas blue is the Republicans' fool's gold, same as Democrats' fantasy of painting Montana blue/Atlas red.
Logged
Bevinevitable
IceSpear
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31,511
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 21, 2013, 04:25:32 am »

Pennsylvania going red/Atlas blue is the Republicans' fool's gold, same as Democrats' fantasy of painting Montana blue/Atlas red.

Speaking of fool's gold, as a Dem, I'm pretty sick and tired of the "OMG GUYZ TEXAS WILL BE BLUE/PURPLE IN JUST A COUPLE MORE CYCLES!!!!111!!!"...which has been said every cycle in the past 20 years.
Logged
Nichlemn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1,925


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 25, 2013, 07:56:04 am »

Pennsylvania going red/Atlas blue is the Republicans' fool's gold, same as Democrats' fantasy of painting Montana blue/Atlas red.

Except that PA is considerably less Democratic than Montana is Republican.
Logged
#StillWithBeto
semocrat08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,470
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: December 26, 2013, 03:48:36 am »

Pennsylvania going red/Atlas blue is the Republicans' fool's gold, same as Democrats' fantasy of painting Montana blue/Atlas red.

Speaking of fool's gold, as a Dem, I'm pretty sick and tired of the "OMG GUYZ TEXAS WILL BE BLUE/PURPLE IN JUST A COUPLE MORE CYCLES!!!!111!!!"...which has been said every cycle in the past 20 years.

You and me both, friend. It's just laughable that so many Democratic posters on here think that Brian Schweitzer can be the progressive savior who can paint Montana blue/Atlas red. I don't get the fascination with Montana's meager three electoral votes.
Logged
pbrower2a
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21,312
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: December 29, 2013, 10:06:29 am »

Pennsylvania going red/Atlas blue is the Republicans' fool's gold, same as Democrats' fantasy of painting Montana blue/Atlas red.

Speaking of fool's gold, as a Dem, I'm pretty sick and tired of the "OMG GUYZ TEXAS WILL BE BLUE/PURPLE IN JUST A COUPLE MORE CYCLES!!!!111!!!"...which has been said every cycle in the past 20 years.

You and me both, friend. It's just laughable that so many Democratic posters on here think that Brian Schweitzer can be the progressive savior who can paint Montana blue/Atlas red. I don't get the fascination with Montana's meager three electoral votes.

It's easy to overestimate the electoral votes of Montana because the state has so huge a chunk of territory. It has no more electoral votes than Delaware.

Maybe Al Gore would have won the 2000 Presidential election had he gone for the four electoral votes of new Hampshire. 
Logged
ElectionsGuy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17,296
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: -7.65

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: December 30, 2013, 06:01:33 am »

If he's not winning Pennsylvania at his peak, then he's not likely to win it almost three years from now.

What makes you think this is his "peak"?
Logged
Bevinevitable
IceSpear
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31,511
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: December 30, 2013, 05:02:47 pm »

If he's not winning Pennsylvania at his peak, then he's not likely to win it almost three years from now.

What makes you think this is his "peak"?

Well, months of glowing media coverage in Southeast PA (and nationwide, for that matter) with little to no pushback since Buono had no campaign. You can get bet Clinton, or any Democrat, wouldn't ever let Christie get as much interrupted positive media coverage as he's gotten in the past couple months.
Logged
pbrower2a
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21,312
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: January 01, 2014, 09:49:30 am »

If he's not winning Pennsylvania at his peak, then he's not likely to win it almost three years from now.

What makes you think this is his "peak"?

Obama approval back in the high 40s. It was down due to a computer glitch.
Logged
Invisible Obama
DrScholl
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9,901
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: January 05, 2014, 05:37:46 pm »

If he's not winning Pennsylvania at his peak, then he's not likely to win it almost three years from now.

What makes you think this is his "peak"?

Um, because he was just re-elected with 60% of the vote and is defined as some sort of moderate, when he really isn't? In a real campaign, his numbers will not be anywhere near as inflated, because he's not really a moderate.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length
Logout

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC