Why did Gore do so well in NY NJ and CT (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 08:54:05 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why did Gore do so well in NY NJ and CT (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did Gore do so well in NY NJ and CT  (Read 6056 times)
Linus Van Pelt
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,145


« on: February 01, 2014, 12:52:23 PM »

The urban/rural divide increased pretty notably in 2000.  That's why densely populated states in the Northeast and California trended Democratic the most.  (Maryland was the one state that swung Gore's way).

Guns had something to do with that, and up against Bush, Gore looked fine in the urban Northeast. 

I disagree on this.  If gun control was such an important factor into why all those states swung R, why wouldn't this have happened in 1996 when it was on the minds of more voters?  And even in 2000, Bush was hardly the most pro-gun candidate to ever run.

The period when the attention of the news media and political debate was most focused on guns was following the Columbine High School shootings in 1999. So even if opinions didn't change much, 2000 was the election when people would be mostly likely to prioritize this issue when voting.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 10 queries.