Arguments against God’s existence, counterarguments, and so on…
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 10:52:43 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: World politics is up Schmitt creek)
  Arguments against God’s existence, counterarguments, and so on…
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Arguments against God’s existence, counterarguments, and so on…  (Read 236 times)
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,035
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 03, 2023, 10:44:03 PM »
« edited: December 03, 2023, 11:16:47 PM by Blue3 »

What do you all see as the biggest arguments against God, the counter-arguments, counters to the counter-arguments, and so on for as long as you think it can go?


Some I’ve heard:



1. The problem of evil: if God was all-loving/all-good, all-knowing, and all-powerful, then evil would not exist.

1a. Counter-argument: God gave us free will, so while God maybe have potential power over us, it’s not exercised absolutely over our actions (perhaps also similar to God’s knowledge, depending on the church’s stance of pre-destination).

1aa. Counter-counter: the problem of suffering, even without free will, there is still suffering inherent to the natural world (ex: disease, famine, earthquakes, floods, etc.)

1aaa. Counter-counter-counter: the scientific record of Earth is wrong, those did not exist until after Adam and Eve.

1aab. Counter-counter-counter: these natural disasters / pandemics / hunger / etc. are character-building.

1aaba. Counter-Counter-counter-counter: this is an argument of the ends justify the means, that suffering is justified if it leads to a greater good, which is evil itself and the justification of many dictators, killers, and war criminals.



2. The problem of hell: if God was all-loving/all-good, all-knowing, and all-powerful, then hell would not exist. It is infinite suffering for limited evil actions, and not justice.

2a. Hell does not exist, or it is empty.

2b. Hell exists, but it is temporary, or it is a different perspective than most think (ex: self-inflicted torture that God let’s happen, self-inflicted darkness and total separation that  God let’s happen).

2ba. This is an argument of the ends justify the means, that suffering is justified if it leads to a greater good, which is evil itself and the justification of many dictators, killers, and war criminals.

2c. Hell exists as usually understood, people are sent there for eternal suffering, and it is just. God intentionally created a universe where he knew there would be this hell and people would be sent to it,  and God still created this kind of universe anyways instead of a different kind of universe.

2ca. This is an argument of the ends justify the means, that suffering is justified if it leads to a greater good, which is evil itself and the justification of many dictators, killers, and war criminals.



3. Euthyphro’s dilemma: if God wills something because it is good, then there’s a sense of good that is greater than God; but if God determines what is good, then he can change what is good at will, and good is therefore subjective and potentially non-eternal.

3a. God and goodness are identical and unchanging.

3aa. What of the times in the Bible/Quran/etc that God changes their mind, or authorizes genocide?

3aaa. The holy book is wrong, or not meant to be literal, or not meant to actually be the voice of God.

3aab. Anything God does is good, and it was always good, and God’s actions are not applicable to the same morality as humans, God doesn’t need to obey their own laws which never applied to themself to begin with.



4. Science can explain all things that were in the past or present attributed to God, or it’s very possible to imagine things not currently explained by science becoming explainable by science.

4a. Just because God isn’t needed for an explanation, doesn’t meant God doesn’t exist.

4aa. Then the existence of God is not relevant.

4aaa. God may not be the origin or ruler, but God still determines what happens after we die, and could theoretically make a change and intervene.

4b. Science is how God accomplishes what God wills.

4ba. Then there is no afterlife.

4baa. The afterlife exists,  and it exists scientifically, it’s just not scientifically explainable yet.



5. Omnipotence paradox: a specific example of this is “can God create a rock so heavy that he cannot lift it?”

5a. Omnipotence is only about things that conform to logic.

5aa. God is not omnipotent because God must conform to the rules of logic.

5aaa. God and logic are identical and unchanging. All of God can be explained as logical, not supernatural.

5aaaa. God is just identical to nature as explained by science.



6. The “no reason” argument: if God was complete and perfect and unchanging, God would not desire to create a universe nor be able to according to the logic of eternity.

6a. God created the universe for no reason, and always did and always will, all of time is unchanging eternity.

6aa. This is not logical.

6aaa. Neither God or the universe are logical.

6aaaa. Then there is no reason to logically debate God’s existence.



7. The “solutions” to the arguments against God’s existence contradict each other sometimes.

7a. Neither God or the universe are logical.

7aa. Then there is no reason to logically debate God’s existence.




What are other arguments/counterarguments/etc. you’ve learned about, or personally thought of?



Logged
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,116
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 05, 2023, 02:23:40 PM »

What you believe doesn't matter in the sense that it doesn't change what is.
If, for example, you believe in an afterlife, it won't matter.
If the afterlife exists, your belief won't change that fact.
The same goes for if no afterlife exists, your belief won't change the fact.
It also seems more important to question whether there is an afterlife than whether there is a Supreme Spirit.

The word "god" means different things to different people.
I don't like the word because it implies that the supreme being or spirit is male.
I also don't believe that the supreme being (if he/she/it exists) is personal.
The idea is that there is some intelligent super human being that creates/controls everything.
Also some people see god as three disparate personalities.
That is very different from a single entity which is the idea in most religions.

"1aa. Counter-counter: the problem of suffering, even without free will, there is still suffering inherent to the natural world (ex: disease, famine, earthquakes, floods, etc.)"
This makes sense to me.

As for evil, it seems wiser to ask "why not" than "why". Understanding why evil exists isn't going to change anything, asking "why not" makes more sense to me since it involves making things better.

Whether hell exists depends on your concept of the Supreme Spirit. If a Supreme Spirit exists, that doesn't mean that hell exists.
So, while it may be meaningful to ask oneself if hell exists, it seems irrelevant to whether a Creator exists.

"God is just identical to nature as explained by science."
This also makes sense to me.

If a personal Supreme Being does exist, wouldn't that Being be more concerned about what you do than what abstract and complicated philosophical or metaphysical thoughts are going through your mind?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.212 seconds with 12 queries.