Mordecai
Jr. Member
Posts: 1,465
|
|
« Reply #25 on: February 09, 2014, 02:42:47 AM » |
|
There's nothing misogynistic about that at all.
Stating that a man's wife would be jealous of his mistress based on being attractive alone certainly could be.
I'm just putting perspective in reference to a previous post by Sanchez regarding the labeling of certain posters as "misogynists." I'm not usually one to be offended by such things but if you're looking for an example of something along those lines, that could be it.
What is misogynistic about it?
Stating that a man's wife would be jealous of his mistress based on being attractive alone certainly could be. I never said that. Apologies. I obviously screwed up the quote and meant for it to be mine from above but I'm sure you knew that...
It's clearly demeaning and portrays a woman as petty and irrational. Hillary wasn't "actually jealous" when Bill was accused of having affairs with women who weren't beautiful actresses? It doesn't express hatred toward Hurley or Hillary based upon them being women.
You probably start essays with "...as defined by Webster's means..." don't you?
u mad?
erm... no? You?
No.
|