2014 Ballot Measure Endorsements

[Oldiesfreak1854]

http://ballotpedia.org/2014_ballot_measures

SB 4 (AL): Yes
Ballot Measure 1 (AK): No
Alaska Marijuana Legalization Measure (AK): No
Alaska Minimum Wage Increase Measure (AK): No
HJR 1009 (AR): Yes
Proposition 41 (CA): Yes
California Rainy Day Budget Stabilization Fund Act (CA): Yes
Amendment 67 (CO): Yes
Amendment 2 (FL): No
SB 886 (HI): Yes
HB 256 (LA): Yes
HB 533 (LA): Yes
SB 128 (LA): Yes
SB 56 (LA): Yes
Transportation Fund Amendment (MD): Yes
Public At 80 (MI): Yes
Michigan Wolf Hunting Referendum (MI): No
Michigan Natural Resources Commission Referendum(MI): No
Missouri Right to Bear Arms Amendment (MO): Yes
New Mexico Dates for School Elections Amendment (NM): No
New York Independent Redistricting Amendment (NY): Yes
New York Electronic Bills Amendment (NY): Yes
New York Bonds for School Technology Act (NY): Yes
Measure 1 (ND): Yes
SJR 1 (OR): Yes
SJR 34 (OR): Yes
South Dakota Insurance Provider Measure (SD): Yes
Amendment 1 (TN): Yes
Initiative 594 (WA): Yes
Initiative 591 (WA): No
Question 1 (WI): Yes

[Gass3268]

SB 4 (AL): No
Ballot Measure 1 (AK): Yes
Alaska Marijuana Legalization Measure (AK): Yes
Alaska Minimum Wage Increase Measure (AK): yEs
HJR 1009 (AR): Yes
Proposition 41 (CA): Yes
California Rainy Day Budget Stabilization Fund Act (CA): No
Amendment 67 (CO): No
Amendment 2 (FL): Yes
SB 886 (HI): Yes
HB 256 (LA): Yes
HB 533 (LA): Yes
SB 128 (LA): Yes
SB 56 (LA): Yes
Transportation Fund Amendment (MD): Yes
Public At 80 (MI): Yes
Michigan Wolf Hunting Referendum (MI): Yes
Michigan Natural Resources Commission Referendum(MI): Yes
Missouri Right to Bear Arms Amendment (MO): No
New Mexico Dates for School Elections Amendment (NM): Yes
New York Independent Redistricting Amendment (NY): Yes
New York Electronic Bills Amendment (NY): Yes
New York Bonds for School Technology Act (NY): Yes
Measure 1 (ND): Yes
SJR 1 (OR): Yes
SJR 34 (OR): Yes
South Dakota Insurance Provider Measure (SD): Yes
Amendment 1 (TN): No
Initiative 594 (WA): Yes
Initiative 591 (WA): No
Question 1 (WI): No

[SPC]

Prop 41 Nay
Prop 42 Aye

[🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸]

SB 4 Foreign Law Recognition Ban (AL): No
Ballot Measure 1 Oil Tax Break Repeal (AK): Yes
Alaska Marijuana Legalization Measure (AK): Yes
Alaska Minimum Wage Increase Measure (AK): No
Bristol Bay Mining Ban (AK): Yes
SCR 1016 State Sovereignty Amdnt (AZ): Yes
SJR 7 Agency Rule Approval (AR): Yes
HJR 1009 - term limit extension (AR): Yes
Proposition 41 Veteran Housing Bond (CA): Yes
Proposition 42 Local Agency Public Records (CA): No
California Rainy Day Budget Stabilization Fund Act (CA): Yes
Insurance Rate Justification Requirement (CA): No
Amendment 67 Personhood Criminal Law (CO): No
Early Voting Amendment (CT): Yes
Amendment 1 Land Trust Acquisition (FL): No
Amendment 2 Medical MJ (FL): Yes
Judicial Vacancies Amendment (FL): No
SB 1084 Private Early Childhood Ed Funding (HI): Yes
SB 886 Raise Judge Retirement Age (HI): Yes
HJR 2 Legislative Delegation of Rulemaking Amendment (ID): Yes
Right to Vote Amendment (IL): Yes
Crime Victims Bill of Rights (IL): Yes
Artificial Reef Development Fund (LA): Yes
SB 56 Disabled Homeowners (LA): Yes
Transportation Fund Amendment (MD): Yes
Public Act 80 Use Tax Revenues (MI): Yes
Michigan Wolf Hunting Veto Referendum (MI): No (overturn law, symbolic vote)
Michigan Natural Resources Commission Veto Referendum(MI): Yes (keep law)
Right to Hunt and Fish Amendment (MS): No
Right to Farm and Ranch Amendment (MO): No
Evidence in Sexual Crimes Against Minors Amendment (MO): Yes
Missouri Right to Bear Arms Amendment (MO): No
Late Voter Registration Revision (MT): No
Question 3 Business Margin Tax (NV): No
New Mexico Dates for School Elections Amendment (NM): Yes
New York Independent Redistricting Amendment (NY): No
New York Electronic Bills Amendment (NY): Yes
New York Bonds for School Technology Act (NY): No
Criminal Defendant May Waive Jury Trial (NC): Yes
Measure 1 (June 10) Initiative Filing Deadline (ND): No
Measure 1 Nov 4 Right to Life (ND): Yes
Measure 3 Commission of Higher Ed (ND): No
Measure 4 Initiative Fiscal Impact (ND): Yes
SJR 1 Post-Secondary Ed (OR): Yes
SJR 34 Hiring of Judges by Nat Guard and Universities (OR): Yes
Alternative Drivers Licenses Veto Referendum (OR): Yes (keep law)
Constitutional Convention (RI): No
Increased Minimum Wage (SD): Yes
South Dakota Insurance Provider Measure (SD): No
Amendment 1 Legislative Powers on Abortion (TN): Yes
Judicial Selection Amendment (TN): Yes
Initiative 594 Gun Background Checks (WA): Yes
Initiative 591 Gun Rights (WA): No
Youth Org Property Tax Exemption (WV): Yes
Question 1 Transportation Fund (WI): Yes
UW Out-of-state Trustees (WY): Yes

[badgate]

LRCA - Transportation Funding Amendment (Diverts oil and gasoline tax revenues from state's "Rainy Day Fund" into transportation funding)

Undecided (Lean No)

[nolesfan2011]

Alaska minimum wage increase, bristol bay mining ban and marijuana legalization all yes
Arkansas term limits extension no
California veteran housing bond issue yes California rainy day fund % increase and insurance company justification yes
Colorado personhood no
Connecticut early voting extension yes
Florida conservation, governor appointing for judicial vacancies and medical marijuana yes
Georgia income tax cap no
Hawaii mandatory judge retirement at 80 yes
Illinois crime victims rights and right to vote yes
Kansas gaming yes
Maine bear hunting restrictions yes
Maryland transportation spending yes
Michigan hunting amendments no
Mississippi right to hunt and fish yes
Missouri keep and bear arms amendment no
Nebraska horse race gambling yes
North Dakota personhood no, North Dakota direct vote on budget issues yes
Rhode island constitutional convention no
South Dakota minimum wage yes
Washington (state) Gun background checks yes, preventing state from outdoing federal gun laws, yes
Wyoming non residents on university board no

[LeBron]

SB 4 Foreign Law Recognition Ban (AL): No
SB 7 Board of Education Expenditure Increase (AL): Yes
SB 467 Franklin County Public Utilities Amendment (AL): Yes

Ballot Measure 1 Oil Tax Break Repeal (AK): Yes
Alaska Marijuana Legalization Measure (AK): No!
Alaska Minimum Wage Increase Measure (AK): Yes!
Bristol Bay Mining Ban (AK): Yes

SCR 1016 State Sovereignty Amendment (AZ): No
HCR 2005 Providing Healthcare Treatment to Terminally Ill without FDA Approval (AZ): Yes

SJR 7 Agency Rule Approval (AR): Yes
HJR 1009 - term limit extension (AR): Yes!
SJR 16 Arkansas Ballot Measure Signature Requirements (AR): Yes

Proposition 41 Veteran Housing Bond (CA): Yes
Proposition 42 Local Agency Public Records (CA): Yes
California Rainy Day Budget Stabilization Fund Act (CA): Yes
Water Bond (CA): Yes
Insurance Rate Justification Requirement (CA): Yes
Increase in Cap on Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Initiative (CA): Yes
Referendum to Overturn Indian Gaming Compacts (CA): Yes (keep law)

Amendment 67 Definition of Person and Child (CO): No!

Early Voting Amendment (CT): Yes!

Amendment 1 Water and Land Conservation (FL): Yes
Amendment 2 Legalizing Medical Marijuana (FL): No
Judicial Vacancies Amendment (FL): No

SR 415 Income Tax Rate Cap Amendment (GA): No
HB 788 Private College Buildings Tax Exemption (GA): Yes

SB 1084 Private Early Childhood Education Public Funding (HI): Yes!
SB 886 Raise Judge Retirement Age (HI): No!
HB 420 Disclosure of Judicial Nominees' Names (HI): Yes
SB 2876 Bonds for Dam and Reservoir Assistance (HI): Yes

HJR 2 Legislative Delegation of Rulemaking Amendment (ID): Yes

Right to Vote Amendment (IL): Yes!
Crime Victims Bill of Rights (IL): Yes

SCR 1618 Charitable Gaming Measure (KS): Yes


HB 256 Redemption of Blighted Property Amendment (LA): Yes
HB 532 Hospital Stabilization Fund Amendment (LA): Yes
HB 533 Creation of Medical Assistance Trust Fund (LA): Yes
SB 128 Artificial Reef Development Fund (LA): Yes
HB 131 Tax Rebate Debate Amendment (LA): Yes
SB 56 Disabled Homeowners (LA): Yes
SB 96 Declare Disabled Veterans w/Homestead Exemptions "Totally disabled or unemployable" (LA): No
HB 426 Wildlife and Fisheries Commission Membership Amendment (LA): No

Bear Hunting Ban Initiative (ME): Yes

Transportation Fund Amendment (MD): Yes

Public Act 80 Reduce State Use Tax (MI): No
Michigan Wolf Hunting Veto Referendum (MI): No (overturn law)
Michigan Natural Resources Commission Veto Referendum(MI): No (overturn law)

Right to Hunt and Fish Amendment (MS): No!

Right to Farm and Ranch Amendment (MO): No
Evidence in Sexual Crimes Against Minors Amendment (MO): Yes!
Missouri Right to Bear Arms Amendment (MO): No!

State Auditor Renaming Amendment (MT): No
Late Voter Registration Revision (MT): No

Horse Race Gambling Legalization and Regulation Amendment (NE): Yes

SJR 14 Creation of a State Intermediate Appellate Court (NV): Yes
SJ 15 Mining Tax Cap Amendment (NV): No
Question 3 Margin Tax for Public Schools (NV): Yes!

New Mexico Dates for School Elections Amendment (NM): Yes
State School Board of Regents Allocation of a Student Representative Amendment (NM): Yes
Candidacy Declarations in Judicial Retention Elections Amendment (NM): Yes
Urban County Charter Amendment (NM): Yes
Land Grant Fund Investments Amendment (NM): Yes

New York Independent Redistricting Amendment (NY): Yes!
New York Electronic Bills Amendment (NY): Yes
New York Bonds for School Technology Act (NY): Yes

Criminal Defendant May Waive Jury Trial and be tried by a Superior Court Judge instead (NC): Yes

Measure 1 Initiative Filing Deadline (ND): Yes
Measure 1 "Life Begins at Conception" Amendment (ND): No!
Measure 2 Property Transfer Tax Ban Amendment (ND): No!
Measure 3 Abolish 8-member Board of Higher Education for 3-member Appointed Commission (ND): No
Measure 4 Referral and Initiative Reform Amendment (ND): Yes

Issue 1 (May 6th) Bonds to Fund Public Infrastructure Amendment (OH): Yes!
Medicaid Expansion Initiative (Withdrawn in Dec. 2013)
Clean Energy Initiative of $13B in bonds for 10 years to invest in infrastructure, research and development into solar, wind and other forms of energy (Rejected by Atty. General DeWine in May 2014 for lack of 1,000 valid signatures)
(Potential (Approved, needs 385,247 sigs by July 2 to make it on Nov 4 ballot) Voter Bill of Rights Amendment expanding early voting on nights and weekends (OH): Yes!

(Potential (Approved, has 100K sigs so far) "Right-to-Work" Amendment - not forcing workers to join unions (OH): No!

(Potential (Approved & "starting over" in hopes of getting same 650K to recommit to revised language) Same-Sex Marriage Amendment - Legalizes SSM with exemption to religious houses of worship or clergy (OH): Yes!!!!!

(Potential (Approved even though the language is too vague on who gets access to marijuana & claim to have gotten the necessary signatures after bombarding precincts on primary day) Medical Marijuana Initiative - Legalizes medical marijuana and allows farmers to produce hemp (which also would have been grounds to be thrown out by the Ballot Board for addressing more than one subject in the amendment) (OH): No!!!

(Potential (Approved, but are disorganized and have about only 20K sigs) Personhood Initiative - would effectively ban abortion (OH): No!

Service in Government and Military Amendment (OK): No

SJR 1 Post-Secondary Education (OR): Yes!
SJR 34 Hiring of Judges by Nat Guard and Universities (OR): No
Alternative Drivers Licenses Veto Referendum (OR): Yes! (keep law)

Constitutional Convention (RI): No

Increased Minimum Wage Measure (SD): Yes!
Insurance Provider Measure (SD): Yes!

Legislative Powers on Abortion Amendment (TN): No!
Judicial Selection Amendment (TN): Yes
Income Tax Prohibition Amendment (TN): No!

Transportation Funding Amendment (TX): Yes

Initiative 594 Gun Background Checks (WA): Yes!
Initiative 591 Gun Rights (WA): No!

Nonprofit Youth Organization Property Tax Exemption (WV): Yes

Question 1 Transportation Fund (WI): No

Permission of University of Wyoming Out-of-state Trustees (WY): No

[free my dawg]

SB 4 Foreign Law Recognition Ban (AL): No
Ballot Measure 1 Oil Tax Break Repeal (AK): Yes
Alaska Marijuana Legalization Measure (AK): Yes, emphatically
Alaska Minimum Wage Increase Measure (AK): Yes, enthusiastically
Bristol Bay Mining Ban (AK): Yes
SCR 1016 State Sovereignty Amdnt (AZ): No/color]
SJR 7 Agency Rule Approval (AR): No
HJR 1009 - term limit extension (AR): Yes
Proposition 41 Veteran Housing Bond (CA): Yes
Proposition 42 Local Agency Public Records (CA): Yes
California Rainy Day Budget Stabilization Fund Act (CA): Yes
Insurance Rate Justification Requirement (CA): Yes
Amendment 67 Personhood Criminal Law (CO): No
Early Voting Amendment (CT): Yes
Amendment 1 Land Trust Acquisition (FL): Yes
Amendment 2 Medical MJ (FL): Yes, not a sociopath
Judicial Vacancies Amendment (FL): No
SB 1084 Private Early Childhood Ed Funding (HI): No
SB 886 Raise Judge Retirement Age (HI): Yes
HJR 2 Legislative Delegation of Rulemaking Amendment (ID): Yes
Right to Vote Amendment (IL): Yes
Crime Victims Bill of Rights (IL): Yes
Charitable Gambling Amendment (KS): Yes
Artificial Reef Development Fund (LA): Yes
SB 56 Disabled Homeowners (LA): Yes
Transportation Fund Amendment (MD): Yes
Bear Hunting Ban (ME): Yes
Public Act 80 Use Tax Revenues (MI): Yes
Michigan Wolf Hunting Veto Referendum (MI): No, overturn firmly
Michigan Natural Resources Commission Veto Referendum(MI): Yes, keep it
Right to Hunt and Fish Amendment (MS): Yes
Right to Farm and Ranch Amendment (MO): No, because f**k Monsanto
Evidence in Sexual Crimes Against Minors Amendment (MO): Yes, of course
Missouri Right to Bear Arms Amendment (MO): No, this goes too far even for me
Late Voter Registration Revision (MT): No
Horse Race Wagering Amendment (NE): Yes
Question 3 Business Margin Tax (NV): Yes
New Mexico Dates for School Elections Amendment (NM): Yes
New York Independent Redistricting Amendment (NY): Yes
New York Electronic Bills Amendment (NY): Yes
New York Bonds for School Technology Act (NY): Yes
Criminal Defendant May Waive Jury Trial (NC): Yes
Measure 1 (June 10) Initiative Filing Deadline (ND): No
Measure 1 Nov 4 Right to Life (ND): No
Measure 3 Commission of Higher Ed (ND): No
Measure 4 Initiative Fiscal Impact (ND): Yes
SJR 1 Post-Secondary Ed (OR): Yes, with extreme enthusiasm
SJR 34 Hiring of Judges by Nat Guard and Universities (OR): Yes
Alternative Drivers Licenses Veto Referendum (OR): Yes, keep law
Constitutional Convention (RI): No
Increased Minimum Wage (SD): Yes
South Dakota Insurance Provider Measure (SD): Yes
Amendment 1 Legislative Powers on Abortion (TN): No
Judicial Selection Amendment (TN): Yes
Initiative 594 Gun Background Checks (WA): Yes
Initiative 591 Gun Rights (WA): No
Youth Org Property Tax Exemption (WV): Yes
Question 1 Transportation Fund (WI): Yes
UW Out-of-state Trustees (WY): No

[Oldiesfreak1854]

http://ballotpedia.org/2014_ballot_measures

Time for an update, now that the ballots are all set.

Amendment 1 (AL): Yes
Ballot Measure 2 (AK): No
Ballot Measure 3 (AK): No
Proposition 304 (AZ): No
Issue 3 (AR): Yes
Issue 5 (AR): No
Amendment 67 (CO): Yes
Amendment 2 (FL): No
Minimum Wage Increase Question (IL): No
Birth Control in Prescription Drug Coverage Question (IL): No
Millionaire Tax Increase for Education Question (IL): No
Question 2 (MA): Yes
Proposal 1 (MI): No (repeal)
Proposal 2 (MI): No (repeal)
Initiative 425 (NE): No
Proposal 1 (NY): Yes
Proposal 2 (NY): Yes
Proposal 3 (NY): Yes
Criminal May Waive Jury Trial Amendment (NC): No
Measure 1 (ND): Yes
Measure 6 (ND): Yes
Measure 89 (OR): Yes
Measure 90 (OR): No
Measure 91 (OR): No
Initiated Measre 17 (SD): Yes
Amendment 1 (TN): Yes
Amendment 2 (TN): No
Amendment B (UT): No
Initiative 594 (WA): Yes
Initiative 591 (WA): No
Initiative 1351 (WA): No

[SNJ1985]

Amendment 1 (Alabama): YES
Amendment 3 (Alabama): YES
Amendment 67 (Colorado): YES
Amendment 2 (Florida): YES
Amendment A (Georgia): YES
Question 3 (Massachusetts): YES
Amendment 1 (North Dakota): YES
Amendment 1 (Tennessee): YES
Proposition 1 (Texas): YES

[Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon]

I've gone line by line for states where I have a lot of varying opinions measure to measure:

Amendment 1 (Alabama) - No (this seems to leave the door open to nullification of federal law)
Amendment 2 (Alabama) - Yes
Amendment 3 (Alabama) - No
Amendment 4 (Alabama) - No
Amendment 5 (Alabama) - Yes
Alaska - yes to all
Arizona - yes to all except Prop. 304
Arkansas - yes to all
California - yes to all
Colorado - yes to all except Amendment 67
Connecticut - yes to all
Florida - yes to all
Georgia - yes to all except Amendment A
Hawaii - yes to all
Idaho - yes to all
Right to Vote (Illinois) - No (this doesn't seem to exclude convicted felons who haven't yet repaid their debt to society)
Crime Victim (Illinois) - Yes
Minimum Wage (Illinois) - Yes
Birth Control (Illinois) - No (Best solution is to make it over the counter)
Millionaire Tax (Illinois) - Yes
Kansas - yes to all
Louisiana - yes to all (Wow, that's a long list of measures for just one state)
Maine - yes to all
Maryland - yes to all
Massachusetts - yes to all except Question 3
Michigan - no to all
Mississippi - yes to all
Missouri - yes to all except Amendment 3
Montana - yes to all except LR 136
Nebraska - yes to all
Nevada - yes to all
New Jersey - yes to all
New Mexico - yes to all
New York - yes to all
North Carolina - yes to all
North Dakota - yes to all except Amendment 1
Oregon - yes to all except Measure 88
Rhode Island - no to all
South Carolina - yes to all
South Dakota - yes to all
Tennessee - yes to all except Amendment 3
Texas - yes to all
Utah - yes to all except Amendment B
Washington - yes to all
West Virginia - yes to all
Wisconsin - yes to all
Wyoming - yes to all

[Mr. Illini]

Ballot Measure 2 (AK): YES
Ballot Measure 3 (AK): YES
Ballot Measure 4 (AK): YES
Proposition 303 (AZ): YES
Proposition 304 (AZ): YES
Issue 3 (AR): YES
Issue 4 (AR): YES
Issue 5 (AR): YES
Prop 47 (CA): YES
Amendment 67 (CO): YES
Prop 105 (CO): NO
Question 1 (CT): YES
Amendment 2 (FL): YES
Amendment A (GA): NO
Right to Vote Amd (IL): YES
Crimes Victims Bill of Rights: YES
Minimum Wage Increase Question (IL): YES
Birth Control in Prescription Drug Coverage Question (IL): YES
Millionaire Tax Increase for Education Question (IL): YES
Amendment 1 (LA): YES
Question 1 (MA): NO
Question 2 (MA): YES
HCR 30 (MS): NO
Amendment 3 (MO): YES
LR-136 (MT): NO
Initiative 425 (NE): YES
Question 3 (NV): YES
Prop 1 (NY): NO
Prop 2 (NY): YES
Criminal May Waive Jury Trial Amendment (NC): NO
Measure 1 (ND): YES
Measure 5 (ND): YES
Measure 6 (ND): YES
Measure 86 (OR): YES
Measure 88 (OR): YES
Measure 89 (OR): YES
Measure 90 (OR): YES
Measure 91 (OR): YES
Initiated Measre 18 (SD): YES
Amendment 1 (TN): YES
Amendment 3 (TN): NO
Initiative 594 (WA): YES
Initiative 591 (WA): YES
Initiative 1351 (WA): YES

[xavier110]

Absolute no to the NY election one. That's the only one I'll follow.

[JerryArkansas]

Yes to all of Arkansas's and yes to New York Proposition 1.

[Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon]

Ballot Measure 2 (AK): YES
Ballot Measure 3 (AK): YES
Ballot Measure 4 (AK): YES
Proposition 303 (AZ): YES
Proposition 304 (AZ): YES
Issue 3 (AR): YES
Issue 4 (AR): YES
Issue 5 (AR): YES
Prop 47 (CA): YES
Amendment 67 (CO): YES
Prop 105 (CO): NO
Question 1 (CT): YES
Amendment 2 (FL): YES
Amendment A (GA): NO
Right to Vote Amd (IL): YES
Crimes Victims Bill of Rights: YES
Minimum Wage Increase Question (IL): YES
Birth Control in Prescription Drug Coverage Question (IL): YES
Millionaire Tax Increase for Education Question (IL): YES
Amendment 1 (LA): YES
Question 1 (MA): NO
Question 2 (MA): YES
HCR 30 (MS): NO
Amendment 3 (MO): YES
LR-136 (MT): NO
Initiative 425 (NE): YES
Question 3 (NV): YES
Prop 1 (NY): NO
Prop 2 (NY): YES
Criminal May Waive Jury Trial Amendment (NC): NO
Measure 1 (ND): YES
Measure 5 (ND): YES
Measure 6 (ND): YES
Measure 86 (OR): YES
Measure 88 (OR): YES
Measure 89 (OR): YES
Measure 90 (OR): YES
Measure 91 (OR): YES
Initiated Measre 18 (SD): YES
Amendment 1 (TN): YES
Amendment 3 (TN): NO
Initiative 594 (WA): YES
Initiative 591 (WA): YES
Initiative 1351 (WA): YES

Uh, Personhood would ban birth control, so you can't really be for personhood and also for requiring health insurance to provide birth control. For amendment 67, yes means a vote FOR the personhood amendment, and for Illinois, yes means a vote FOR requiring health insurance companies to provide birth control.

[Mr. Illini]

Uh, Personhood would ban birth control, so you can't really be for personhood and also for requiring health insurance to provide birth control. For amendment 67, yes means a vote FOR the personhood amendment, and for Illinois, yes means a vote FOR requiring health insurance companies to provide birth control.

"Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado constitution protecting pregnant women and unborn children by defining "person" and "child" in the Colorado criminal code and the Colorado wrongful death act to include unborn human beings?"

Pretty sure 67 is limited to the issue of abortion, not birth control...

[Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon]

Uh, Personhood would ban birth control, so you can't really be for personhood and also for requiring health insurance to provide birth control. For amendment 67, yes means a vote FOR the personhood amendment, and for Illinois, yes means a vote FOR requiring health insurance companies to provide birth control.

"Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado constitution protecting pregnant women and unborn children by defining "person" and "child" in the Colorado criminal code and the Colorado wrongful death act to include unborn human beings?"

Pretty sure 67 is limited to the issue of abortion, not birth control...

Since it is including everything from the moment of conception, it does ban some (albeit not all) forms of birth control - forms of birth control that the Illinois law would require health insurance to provide.

The other reason personhood is so bad is that it is a complete ban on abortion - no exceptions for rape, incest, or life of the mother - a complete ban under all circumstances.

[bedstuy]

Uh, Personhood would ban birth control, so you can't really be for personhood and also for requiring health insurance to provide birth control. For amendment 67, yes means a vote FOR the personhood amendment, and for Illinois, yes means a vote FOR requiring health insurance companies to provide birth control.

"Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado constitution protecting pregnant women and unborn children by defining "person" and "child" in the Colorado criminal code and the Colorado wrongful death act to include unborn human beings?"

Pretty sure 67 is limited to the issue of abortion, not birth control...

Since it is including everything from the moment of conception, it does ban some (albeit not all) forms of birth control - forms of birth control that the Illinois law would require health insurance to provide.

The other reason personhood is so bad is that it is a complete ban on abortion - no exceptions for rape, incest, or life of the mother - a complete ban under all circumstances.

Would it also ban any drug that could interfere with implantation like aspirin and ibuprofen? 

[Mr. Illini]

Uh, Personhood would ban birth control, so you can't really be for personhood and also for requiring health insurance to provide birth control. For amendment 67, yes means a vote FOR the personhood amendment, and for Illinois, yes means a vote FOR requiring health insurance companies to provide birth control.

"Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado constitution protecting pregnant women and unborn children by defining "person" and "child" in the Colorado criminal code and the Colorado wrongful death act to include unborn human beings?"

Pretty sure 67 is limited to the issue of abortion, not birth control...

Since it is including everything from the moment of conception, it does ban some (albeit not all) forms of birth control - forms of birth control that the Illinois law would require health insurance to provide.

The other reason personhood is so bad is that it is a complete ban on abortion - no exceptions for rape, incest, or life of the mother - a complete ban under all circumstances.

Conception doesn't occur if birth control is used, so there therefore can be no termination.

[Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon]

Uh, Personhood would ban birth control, so you can't really be for personhood and also for requiring health insurance to provide birth control. For amendment 67, yes means a vote FOR the personhood amendment, and for Illinois, yes means a vote FOR requiring health insurance companies to provide birth control.

"Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado constitution protecting pregnant women and unborn children by defining "person" and "child" in the Colorado criminal code and the Colorado wrongful death act to include unborn human beings?"

Pretty sure 67 is limited to the issue of abortion, not birth control...

Since it is including everything from the moment of conception, it does ban some (albeit not all) forms of birth control - forms of birth control that the Illinois law would require health insurance to provide.

The other reason personhood is so bad is that it is a complete ban on abortion - no exceptions for rape, incest, or life of the mother - a complete ban under all circumstances.

Conception doesn't occur if birth control is used, so there therefore can be no termination.

Uh, Personhood would ban birth control, so you can't really be for personhood and also for requiring health insurance to provide birth control. For amendment 67, yes means a vote FOR the personhood amendment, and for Illinois, yes means a vote FOR requiring health insurance companies to provide birth control.

"Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado constitution protecting pregnant women and unborn children by defining "person" and "child" in the Colorado criminal code and the Colorado wrongful death act to include unborn human beings?"

Pretty sure 67 is limited to the issue of abortion, not birth control...

Since it is including everything from the moment of conception, it does ban some (albeit not all) forms of birth control - forms of birth control that the Illinois law would require health insurance to provide.

The other reason personhood is so bad is that it is a complete ban on abortion - no exceptions for rape, incest, or life of the mother - a complete ban under all circumstances.

Would it also ban any drug that could interfere with implantation like aspirin and ibuprofen? 

To clear this all up, I offer this from rationalwiki.org:

"Ramifications of fetal personhood

Personhood laws are thinly veiled attempts to circumvent Roe v. Wade, by making the fetal life as important (or in some ways, more important) than the wishes, health, or in some cases life of the woman who is carrying the fetus.
[edit]Serious
The single most important goal for any personhood law is to restrict, if not make totally illegal, the right to access abortions. If the zygote is a legal person, then Roe v. Wade was found on false grounds and no longer applies. Also, the idea of "viability" as a test no longer applies. A zygote or fetus must therefore be protected from being killed, just like any other person is.
Following that, most forms of hormonal birth control can potentially be attacked. Birth control works in two ways. First, it regulates the body so an egg is normally not released. No egg, no baby. However, sometimes an egg is released, but the hormones make the uterus a hostile environment for the zygote, causing it to pass out of the body with the woman's next cycle. If you assume a "person" begins at conception, birth control would necessarily be harmful to that person. Murder, if you will. The Virgina and Oklahoma State Legislators which are pushing personhood bills, were asked by those in opposition to put a basic rider protecting a woman's right to access hormonal birth control. In both cases, they gave a resounding "no", despite claims that they are not trying to make birth control illegal.
Another serious issue that is being brought up by ob-gyn's in the states trying to pass personhood laws, is the effect this will have on risky pregnancies, specifically ectopic pregnancy, because there is not sufficient legal markers/legal language to define a pregnancy as a "healthy one", nor define the rights of the fetus if it cannot survive[4].
Modern fertility treatments, specifically "in vitro" treatments would also become problematic. Currently, when a couple uses in vitro they will have several eggs harvested and fertilized at one time, "just in case" (usually between 5-10, with an implant of 2-4 of them[5]). The potential problem here, is that this practice creates thousands of zygotes, frozen in labs. Disposal of the fertilized egg can already be an ethical issue for the lab or parents, but this law would increase the complications. Potentially, all fertilized eggs must have a chance at life, so the couple would either have to only fertilize one egg at a time, or have twins, triplets and novemtuplets.
Less likely, but still possible ramifications can include drastic laws against smoking, drinking or drug use while pregnant. While most women who want to be pregnant limit or remove those from their lives during pregnancy, some women do not, and some women cannot. Especially if they do not want the child in the first place. Though likely a violation of their civil rights, women are already charged for child abuse if they use while pregnant; personhood laws only make that situation worse. One can imagine a woman addicted to drugs who is living on the streets. She cannot have an abortion, but any child she has will face extreme health problems if it survives to term. And our answer will be to put her in jail.
Any miscarriage can potentially be considered manslaughter or a murder, depending on what the woman did or did not do during her pregnancy.
[edit]Funny, in a sad kinda way
These are side effects of this law that are unlikely, but slightly amusing to think about in a sad, "what the hell is wrong with this picture" sort of way.
Mandatory checks to ensure a woman is not pregnant before she enters a bar, flies across country, deep sea dives or performs other activities that slightly increase her risk to miscarry.
Limits to a woman's right to use aspirin, which is known to increase the risk of miscarriage or lack of implantation in at-risk women. Got a headache? Too bad—you might be pregnant.
Limiting a woman's access to medical care. Things like synthetic thyroid, heart medication, acne drugs, and insulin can all have serious effects on a fetus and cause miscarriage. It is after all, a person.
Women can take out life insurance every single month, and collect the fees when, as usual, the baby doesn't implant though no fault of their own.
The division that produces identical twins occurs after fertilization - hence the term monozygotic. This would result in generating two "full persons" from just one. So, which is the original? Or has the original been killed and replaced by two new ones? Is there any legal precedent that would solve this absolute mess?
Pregnant women would be carrying full persons, so would be allowed in the carpool lane.
On the bright side, a fertilized zygote will always be accompanied by an adult should it be accidentally taken to an R-Rated movie.
The fetus can sue his siblings for a part of the estate.
Women will save blood from each period for official examination by authorities to determine whether or not it was an early miscarriage.
If authorities determine a period is a miscarriage, authorities will conduct an investigation to determine the cause [see above].
If an early miscarriage was caused by the actions of the mother, authorities will determine whether it was accidental or premeditated and charge the mother with manslaughter or homicide as the case may be.
Women/couples with a history of miscarriage might be banned from attempting to reproduce at all, since the risk of the loss of a human life would be so great. In fact, since 31% of pregnancies are lost before 20 weeks gestation[6], all attempts at reproduction might be considered reckless endangerment since they clearly "[create] a substantial risk of death or serious physical injury to another person".[7]"

[bedstuy]

Uh, Personhood would ban birth control, so you can't really be for personhood and also for requiring health insurance to provide birth control. For amendment 67, yes means a vote FOR the personhood amendment, and for Illinois, yes means a vote FOR requiring health insurance companies to provide birth control.

"Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado constitution protecting pregnant women and unborn children by defining "person" and "child" in the Colorado criminal code and the Colorado wrongful death act to include unborn human beings?"

Pretty sure 67 is limited to the issue of abortion, not birth control...

Since it is including everything from the moment of conception, it does ban some (albeit not all) forms of birth control - forms of birth control that the Illinois law would require health insurance to provide.

The other reason personhood is so bad is that it is a complete ban on abortion - no exceptions for rape, incest, or life of the mother - a complete ban under all circumstances.

Conception doesn't occur if birth control is used, so there therefore can be no termination.

Are you aware of the debate about emergency contraception?  Republicans believe that anything that interferes with the implantation is tantamount to abortion for some crazy reason. 

[New_Conservative]

Question 1 (MA) Yes
Question 2 (MA) No
Question 3 (MA) No
Question 4 (MA) No

[Oldiesfreak1854]

Amendment 67 (CO): YES
Measure 1 (ND): YES
Initiated Measre 18 (SD): YES
Amendment 1 (TN): YES

Are you pro-life?  Your sig shows you supporting a bunch of pro-choice Democrats.

[Bojack Horseman]

SB 4 (AL): No
Ballot Measure 1 (AK): No
Alaska Marijuana Legalization Measure (AK): Yes
Alaska Minimum Wage Increase Measure (AK): yes
HJR 1009 (AR): No
Proposition 41 (CA): Yes
California Rainy Day Budget Stabilization Fund Act (CA): Yes
Amendment 67 (CO): Hell no
Amendment 2 (FL): Yes
SB 886 (HI): No
HB 256 (LA): Yes
HB 533 (LA): Yes
SB 128 (LA): Yes
SB 56 (LA): Yes
Transportation Fund Amendment (MD): Yes
Public Act 80 (MI): No

Michigan Wolf Hunting Referendum (MI): No
Michigan Natural Resources Commission Referendum(MI): No
Missouri Right to Bear Arms Amendment (MO): No
New Mexico Dates for School Elections Amendment (NM): Yes
New York Independent Redistricting Amendment (NY): No
New York Electronic Bills Amendment (NY): Yes
New York Bonds for School Technology Act (NY): Yes
Measure 1 (ND): Hell no
SJR 1 (OR): Yes
SJR 34 (OR): Yes
South Dakota Insurance Provider Measure (SD): Yes
Amendment 1 (TN): No
Initiative 594 (WA): Yes
Initiative 591 (WA): No
Question 1 (WI): Yes

[Senate Minority Leader Lord Voldemort]

Don't know anything about other states' ballot measures, but California's are as follows:

Prop 1 (Water Infrastructure Bond)- Yes
Prop 2(Rainy Day Fund)- Yes
Prop 45 (Insurance Commissioner Approved Rate Changes)- Yes
Prop 46 (Doctors Drug Testing)- No
Prop 47 (Non-violent Drug Offenders Penalties Changes)- Yes
Prop 48 (Indian Gaming)- Yes