Kelo V. City of New London (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 03:23:13 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Kelo V. City of New London (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who Would You Have Sided With?
#1
Majority
 
#2
Dissent
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 16

Author Topic: Kelo V. City of New London  (Read 4047 times)
Cassius
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,599


« on: June 18, 2014, 01:07:46 PM »

Dissent. Of course, I'm not expert in the law, especially not American constitutional law, but, from my point of view, 'economic development' is a very spurious justification for the seizure of private land via eminent domain. State security matters are, from my perspective, the only major reason for the use of eminent domain.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 15 queries.