Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
February 21, 2019, 09:40:36 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: New features added! Click here for more information. Click here to configure new features.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  Election Archive
| | |-+  All Archived Boards
| | | |-+  2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
| | | | |-+  2014 Senatorial Election Polls
| | | | | |-+  GA-Rasmussen: Perdue+5
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: GA-Rasmussen: Perdue+5  (Read 2001 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 47,961
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -6.09

P P
View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 18, 2014, 10:14:38 am »

46-41 Perdue/Nunn

Link later.
Logged
Dave Leip
leip
Administrator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,280
United States


P P
View Profile WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 18, 2014, 02:37:18 pm »

New Poll: Georgia Senator by Rasmussen on 2014-09-16

Summary: D: 41%, R: 46%, I: 4%, U: 9%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Griff
Adam Griffin
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14,740
Greece


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 23, 2014, 02:37:58 am »

Weirdly enough, both of Rasmussen's most recent polls for Sen and Gov look accurate.
Logged

This thread went completely off the rails. Exactly as Griffin would have wanted.
Del Tachi
Republican95
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5,649
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 23, 2014, 12:00:22 pm »

Weirdly enough, both of Rasmussen's most recent polls for Sen and Gov look accurate.

Eh, probably means that both GA-SEN and GA-GOV are at least Likely R by this point.  Sorry Buddy. 
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 28,732
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 23, 2014, 03:05:53 pm »

Excellent News!
Logged
Castro
Castro2020
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10,775
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 23, 2014, 05:10:38 pm »

Weirdly enough, both of Rasmussen's most recent polls for Sen and Gov look accurate.

Eh, probably means that both GA-SEN and GA-GOV are at least Likely R by this point.  Sorry Buddy. 

I'll give you Lean R for GA-SEN but Likely R for GA-GOV? Absolutely not
Logged
2,868,691
Harry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22,746
South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islan


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 23, 2014, 05:19:00 pm »

She's within 5 now? #Comeback
Logged

Dixie Reborn
BeyondTruthAndIdeals
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 821
Canada


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 23, 2014, 05:24:50 pm »

She's within 5 now? #Comeback

Terri Lynn Land is within five in Michigan, but no one says that's a comeback.
Logged

GaussLaw
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1,292
View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 23, 2014, 08:20:04 pm »

She's within 5 now? #Comeback

Terri Lynn Land is within five in Michigan, but no one says that's a comeback.

Indeed.  A 2 point Ras lead for Peters is "Safe D" according to DrScholl.  I think Lean/Likely D is still fair, but Safe D is ridiculous when you have multiple polls within the MoE on that race.

Anyways, this is Lean/Likely R.  It's analogous to Michigan for the GOP.
Logged


Uhhhh, I don't wanna decide. When we're left, I'm right, and vice-versa. Physics. Bible.

PM:
E: 1.52
S: 4.67
Bevinevitable
IceSpear
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30,562
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.65, S: -5.70

P P

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 23, 2014, 08:37:28 pm »

She's within 5 now? #Comeback

Terri Lynn Land is within five in Michigan, but no one says that's a comeback.

Indeed.  A 2 point Ras lead for Peters is "Safe D" according to DrScholl.  I think Lean/Likely D is still fair, but Safe D is ridiculous when you have multiple polls within the MoE on that race.

Anyways, this is Lean/Likely R.  It's analogous to Michigan for the GOP.

The fact that it's essential for Nunn to hit 50% while Land could squeak by with a plurality actually makes me think Michigan is slightly more likely to flip than Georgia. I don't see either happening, of course.
Logged

Invisible Obama
DrScholl
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8,816
United States



View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 23, 2014, 09:43:06 pm »

She's within 5 now? #Comeback

Terri Lynn Land is within five in Michigan, but no one says that's a comeback.

Indeed.  A 2 point Ras lead for Peters is "Safe D" according to DrScholl.  I think Lean/Likely D is still fair, but Safe D is ridiculous when you have multiple polls within the MoE on that race.

Anyways, this is Lean/Likely R.  It's analogous to Michigan for the GOP.

Land is a horrible candidate and that really makes a big difference. Sure, you could claim that Land is really leading and Peters lead is only due to error, but that's not exactly how polling works. Fact of it is, Michigan was a climb to begin with, but with Land being a horrible candidate, it is quite Safe for Democrats.
Logged

LOCK TRUMP UP!
GaussLaw
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1,292
View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 23, 2014, 09:53:04 pm »

She's within 5 now? #Comeback

Terri Lynn Land is within five in Michigan, but no one says that's a comeback.

Indeed.  A 2 point Ras lead for Peters is "Safe D" according to DrScholl.  I think Lean/Likely D is still fair, but Safe D is ridiculous when you have multiple polls within the MoE on that race.

Anyways, this is Lean/Likely R.  It's analogous to Michigan for the GOP.

Land is a horrible candidate and that really makes a big difference. Sure, you could claim that Land is really leading and Peters lead is only due to error, but that's not exactly how polling works. Fact of it is, Michigan was a climb to begin with, but with Land being a horrible candidate, it is quite Safe for Democrats.

Sigh......all I was saying is that Michigan is as safe for Democrats only as much as Georgia is safe for Republicans, which is lean/likely D/R, respectively.  Since when did I say that Peter would lose?
Logged


Uhhhh, I don't wanna decide. When we're left, I'm right, and vice-versa. Physics. Bible.

PM:
E: 1.52
S: 4.67
Invisible Obama
DrScholl
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8,816
United States



View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: September 23, 2014, 09:55:12 pm »

She's within 5 now? #Comeback

Terri Lynn Land is within five in Michigan, but no one says that's a comeback.

Indeed.  A 2 point Ras lead for Peters is "Safe D" according to DrScholl.  I think Lean/Likely D is still fair, but Safe D is ridiculous when you have multiple polls within the MoE on that race.

Anyways, this is Lean/Likely R.  It's analogous to Michigan for the GOP.

Land is a horrible candidate and that really makes a big difference. Sure, you could claim that Land is really leading and Peters lead is only due to error, but that's not exactly how polling works. Fact of it is, Michigan was a climb to begin with, but with Land being a horrible candidate, it is quite Safe for Democrats.

Sigh......all I was saying is that Michigan is as safe for Democrats only as much as Georgia is safe for Republicans, which is lean/likely D/R, respectively.  Since when did I say that Peter would lose?

You mentioned the margin of error and all I was saying is that you can't really contribute error to Peters lead.
Logged

LOCK TRUMP UP!
Gustaf
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29,228


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

P P

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: September 25, 2014, 04:54:26 am »

She's within 5 now? #Comeback

Terri Lynn Land is within five in Michigan, but no one says that's a comeback.

Indeed.  A 2 point Ras lead for Peters is "Safe D" according to DrScholl.  I think Lean/Likely D is still fair, but Safe D is ridiculous when you have multiple polls within the MoE on that race.

Anyways, this is Lean/Likely R.  It's analogous to Michigan for the GOP.

Land is a horrible candidate and that really makes a big difference. Sure, you could claim that Land is really leading and Peters lead is only due to error, but that's not exactly how polling works. Fact of it is, Michigan was a climb to begin with, but with Land being a horrible candidate, it is quite Safe for Democrats.

Sigh......all I was saying is that Michigan is as safe for Democrats only as much as Georgia is safe for Republicans, which is lean/likely D/R, respectively.  Since when did I say that Peter would lose?

You mentioned the margin of error and all I was saying is that you can't really contribute error to Peters lead.

Are you sure you know what a margin of error is in this context?
Logged

This place really has become a cesspool of degenerate whores...

Economic score: +0.9
Social score: -2.61

In MN for fantasy stuff, member of the most recently dissolved centrist party.
Invisible Obama
DrScholl
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8,816
United States



View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: September 25, 2014, 09:16:59 am »

She's within 5 now? #Comeback

Terri Lynn Land is within five in Michigan, but no one says that's a comeback.

Indeed.  A 2 point Ras lead for Peters is "Safe D" according to DrScholl.  I think Lean/Likely D is still fair, but Safe D is ridiculous when you have multiple polls within the MoE on that race.

Anyways, this is Lean/Likely R.  It's analogous to Michigan for the GOP.

Land is a horrible candidate and that really makes a big difference. Sure, you could claim that Land is really leading and Peters lead is only due to error, but that's not exactly how polling works. Fact of it is, Michigan was a climb to begin with, but with Land being a horrible candidate, it is quite Safe for Democrats.

Sigh......all I was saying is that Michigan is as safe for Democrats only as much as Georgia is safe for Republicans, which is lean/likely D/R, respectively.  Since when did I say that Peter would lose?

You mentioned the margin of error and all I was saying is that you can't really contribute error to Peters lead.

Are you sure you know what a margin of error is in this context?

I am well aware of what margin of error means, thank you very much. I simply don't think a race being "within the margin of error" means that it will necessarily go either way.
« Last Edit: September 25, 2014, 09:35:32 am by Invisible Obama »Logged

LOCK TRUMP UP!
Gustaf
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29,228


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

P P

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: September 28, 2014, 05:39:22 pm »

She's within 5 now? #Comeback

Terri Lynn Land is within five in Michigan, but no one says that's a comeback.

Indeed.  A 2 point Ras lead for Peters is "Safe D" according to DrScholl.  I think Lean/Likely D is still fair, but Safe D is ridiculous when you have multiple polls within the MoE on that race.

Anyways, this is Lean/Likely R.  It's analogous to Michigan for the GOP.

Land is a horrible candidate and that really makes a big difference. Sure, you could claim that Land is really leading and Peters lead is only due to error, but that's not exactly how polling works. Fact of it is, Michigan was a climb to begin with, but with Land being a horrible candidate, it is quite Safe for Democrats.

Sigh......all I was saying is that Michigan is as safe for Democrats only as much as Georgia is safe for Republicans, which is lean/likely D/R, respectively.  Since when did I say that Peter would lose?

You mentioned the margin of error and all I was saying is that you can't really contribute error to Peters lead.

Are you sure you know what a margin of error is in this context?

I am well aware of what margin of error means, thank you very much. I simply don't think a race being "within the margin of error" means that it will necessarily go either way.

I'm still not convinced.
Logged

This place really has become a cesspool of degenerate whores...

Economic score: +0.9
Social score: -2.61

In MN for fantasy stuff, member of the most recently dissolved centrist party.
Invisible Obama
DrScholl
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8,816
United States



View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: September 28, 2014, 05:53:11 pm »

She's within 5 now? #Comeback

Terri Lynn Land is within five in Michigan, but no one says that's a comeback.

Indeed.  A 2 point Ras lead for Peters is "Safe D" according to DrScholl.  I think Lean/Likely D is still fair, but Safe D is ridiculous when you have multiple polls within the MoE on that race.

Anyways, this is Lean/Likely R.  It's analogous to Michigan for the GOP.

Land is a horrible candidate and that really makes a big difference. Sure, you could claim that Land is really leading and Peters lead is only due to error, but that's not exactly how polling works. Fact of it is, Michigan was a climb to begin with, but with Land being a horrible candidate, it is quite Safe for Democrats.

Sigh......all I was saying is that Michigan is as safe for Democrats only as much as Georgia is safe for Republicans, which is lean/likely D/R, respectively.  Since when did I say that Peter would lose?

You mentioned the margin of error and all I was saying is that you can't really contribute error to Peters lead.

Are you sure you know what a margin of error is in this context?

I am well aware of what margin of error means, thank you very much. I simply don't think a race being "within the margin of error" means that it will necessarily go either way.

I'm still not convinced.

Well, I certainly won't lose any sleep over whether or not you are convinced. I don't really care if you are, because it's not that serious to me.
Logged

LOCK TRUMP UP!
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines