CO-PPP: Gardner+2 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 04:56:25 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  2014 Senatorial Election Polls
  CO-PPP: Gardner+2 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CO-PPP: Gardner+2  (Read 4396 times)
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


« on: September 25, 2014, 01:05:00 PM »
What's interesting is that Gardner is leading by 2 in a sample that's almost 70% pro-choice. Either Colorado really is Libertarian or Udall is running a sh**tty campaign.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


« Reply #1 on: September 25, 2014, 04:49:56 PM »
Quote from: Gass3268 on September 25, 2014, 04:49:04 PM

After looking through the crosstabs, I agree. It would not be shocked if Gardner won.

Like I said, if Udall runs a bad campaign, he loses.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


« Reply #2 on: September 25, 2014, 04:50:53 PM »
Quote from: Gass3268 on September 25, 2014, 04:49:04 PM

After looking through the crosstabs, I agree. It would not be shocked if Gardner won.

Like I said, if Udall runs a bad campaign, he loses. Or if Gardner runs a really good one. There was thinking about Gardner being on a short list for VP for the R ticket.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


« Reply #3 on: October 01, 2014, 10:32:07 AM »
Quote from: Tender Branson on October 01, 2014, 08:40:35 AM
Rasmussen will be out with a new CO poll later today ...
Are you certain?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 14 queries.