Japan General Discussion
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 10:57:20 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Japan General Discussion
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 ... 25
Author Topic: Japan General Discussion  (Read 61251 times)
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,416


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #325 on: December 15, 2015, 04:38:55 PM »
« edited: December 15, 2015, 04:44:32 PM by What wilt thou give me for my sucking? »

If these were the results then Abe for sure will have the mandate to change the Constitution.   How the referendum goes after that will depend on the nature of the Constitutional change and how Abe sells it.

This is sort of what I was getting at above. He might be able to sell the Japanese people on a straight repeal or rewording of Article 9, even though that's currently unpopular. But that isn't the full extent of what Jiminto has been proposing over the years.

Then again, if the Japanese people are honestly willing to vote themselves a two-thirds House of Representatives majority for Jiminto alone, who knows what else they're willing to vote themselves given the right spin?
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,512
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #326 on: December 16, 2015, 10:39:03 PM »

Fuji Daily came out with their own projections of a double election result.  It is also a large LDP-KP landslide although some of their numbers make no sense in their Lower House projections.

They have for Upper House

LDP            69
KP              10
DPJ            17
JIP               4
JCP            10
ORA             5
SDP             1
PLP              1
FPG             1
AEJ             1
NPR            1
Other          1

This seems possible if JIP LDP and JCP fail to form tactical alliances AND a swing toward LDP-KP from 2014.

They have for Lower House

             FPTP     PR          Total
LDP        235      72          307
KP             9       26           35
DPJ          29      35            64
JIP            5       13            18
ORA          3       10            13
JCP           4        22           26
SDP          0         2              2
PLP           1         0             1
Others      9         0              9

This seems to imply that LDP-KP vote share to be a bit higher than 50% on the PR which would even beat their 2013 performance which I guess in theory is possible.  What does not make sense is how JCP can win 4 FPTP seats.  That is only possible of JCP has some tactical alliances with DPJ-JIP.  But if that is the case then DPJ and JIP would not do so poorly on the FPTP section.  Also it is pretty much impossible for SDP to win 2 PR seats. 
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,512
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #327 on: December 17, 2015, 06:54:56 AM »
« Edited: December 17, 2015, 08:05:43 AM by jaichind »

PFG Upper House MP 江口克彦 (Eguchi Katsuhiko) has left PFG to be an independent indicating that he might join ORA.  Of course he being up for re-election in 2016 and having no prospect of being re-elected on the FPG slate is a key factor.  I guess he is hoping to get on the ORA PR list.   PFG now has only 4 MPs and below the threshold to form a caucus which in turn means it will lose government funding.  PFG is pretty much finished as is.  It could perhaps merge with AEJ or the new JIP splinter ARG or perhaps with ORA itself.

Also, Former PFG MP 松沢成文 (Shigefumi Matsuzawa) who quit PFG back in the summer when it was obvious he could not win the PFG leadership contest is looking to form yet another Right wing party.  It seems he might be perhaps trying to create this new party by merging ARG into it.  I guess it is also possible if 江口克彦 (Eguchi Katsuhiko) does not get a good deal from ORA he might join this outfit.
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,512
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #328 on: December 17, 2015, 07:44:23 AM »
« Edited: December 17, 2015, 09:44:57 PM by jaichind »

In addition to redistricting already made for Upper House there are now plans on the table for redistricting for Lower House.  The goal is to get the vote disparity between the largest and smallest district to below 2:1 as stipulated by the Supreme court.  The idea is to increase the number of seats in prefectures that gained population, especially Tokyo which will go from 25 to 28 while reducing the number of seats in areas the mostly rural prefectures.  Okinawa for some reason is going down from 4 to 3 even though they have been gaining population.  Overall the number of FPTP seats will go down from 295 to 289.  For PR section they are also reducing the over number of PR seats from 180 to 176 with Tokyo area gaining 1 and 5 other sections each losing 1.   Total seats going down from 475 seats to 465 seats.



So far this is the proposal.  The rumor is the Abe administration wants to push this through as to give it an excuse to have a double election in summer of 2016. He can say "Look, the supreme court indicated that we have to redistrict to be in compliance with the constitution so  now we did it lets have an election ASAP as to remove any double on the constitutionality of the elected MPs of the lower house."
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,512
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #329 on: December 17, 2015, 01:42:38 PM »

I wrote about this before but it is interesting to talk about the reason/nature of LDP domination of politics in Japan.  It is based on 3 facts which reinforce each other

1) LDP all things equal is the ruling party at the national level
2) LDP dominates local politics at the prefecture level
3) KP is locked into alliance with LDP at the national and local level in thick and thin

These facts are reinforced by the following set of facts

1) LDP has the ability to contain and manage conflicts of various factions all within the LDP ecosystem with a ruthless attention to make sure intra-factional conflict are managed in such a way that everyone that has real grassroots support and can win are still in LDP.  In   In other words the rule: "If you win you are LDP"
2) Prefecture governments cannot run budget deficits so prefecture governments must have relationships with the national governments for funding and subsidies to be able to provide pork to the voting population and various local vested interest.  So an up-an-coming local politician needs to have connections to the national government though some organizational means.
3) National elections are won in small district level where the personal vote are critical to winning. The personal vote is grown by politicians at the prefecture level which is really a farm league for national politics.
4) KP desires above all legitimacy in mainstream society and media.  This is critical especially after the 1995 Tokyo subway sarin attack by the  Aum Shinrikyo cult.  It was after 1995 when the KP which was formed as an anti-LDP force became pro-LDP so it can me seen as mainstream.

So the net affect of all this is:

A rising local politician with local grassroots support all things equal join a LDP faction at the prefecture level and becomes part of the LDP prefecture government.  The range of positions of these LDP factions are such so that it gives the local politician the ability to join the faction that more fits with his ideological and local profile.  He then rises up in the national level adding his personal vote to the LDP+KP vote base to win national elections and add to the LDP majority which in turn is a source of funding for the next generation of rising local politician.   

A key part of all this the state of local prefecture politics in Japan which I spend some time looking at. I will report my findings as I pointed out, LDP success in local politics along with KP support locally as well is a key if not THE key linchpin of LDP domination of Japanese politics.
 
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,512
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #330 on: December 18, 2015, 12:14:08 PM »
« Edited: December 18, 2015, 10:33:37 PM by jaichind »

週刊現代 (Shūkan Gendai) did a survey on the PR section of the lower House.  The results by block was

Hokkaido (北海道)                LDP 3 DPJ 2 KP 1 JCP 2 (+1) JIP 0 (-1)
Tohoku (東北)                     LDP 5 DPJ 3 (-1) KP 2 JCP 2 (+1) JIP 2
Kitakanto (北関東)               LDP 8 DPJ 4 KP 3 JCP 3(+1) JIP 2 (-1)
Minamikanto (南関東)          LDP 11 (+3) DPJ 5 (+1) KP 3 JCP 2 (-1) JIP 1 (-3)
Tokyo (東京)                       LDP 6 DPJ 3 KP 2 JCP 3 JIP 2 (-1) ORA 1 (+1)
Hokurikushinetsu(北陸信越) LDP 6 (+1) DPJ 2 (-1) KP 1 JCP 1 JIP 1
Tokai (東海)                         LDP 9 (+1) DPJ 4 (-1) KP 3 JIP 3 JCP 2
Kinki (近畿)                         ORA 10 (+10) LDP 9 KP 3 DPJ 2 (-2) JCP 2 (-2) JIP 2 (-6)
Chugoku (中国)                   LDP 5 KP 2 DPJ 1 (-1) JCP 1 ORA 1 (+1) JIP 1
Shikoku (四国)                    LDP 3 DPJ 1 KP 1 ORA 1 (+1) JIP 0 (-1)
Kyushu (九州)                     LDP 8 KP 4 DPJ 3 JCP 2 JIP 2 (-1) JCP 1 ORA 1 (+1) SDP 1

Which gives us

LDP     73 (+5)
DPJ     30  (-5)
KP       26
JCP     20
JIP      16 (-14)
ORA    14 (+14)
SDP      1

In this poll it seems that the the urban areas outside of Tokyo what remains of the YP vote base went over to LDP completely from JIP.  In the rural North it is the JCP that is gaining from DPJ, while in Osaka the JCP and DPJ loses ground to ORA as LDP-KP hold their own.  JIP and ORA are actually doing a bit better than I would expect.  These results would seem to imply that LDP-KP will be around 50%-51% of the vote on the PR section which would mean a mega landslide in FPTP unless DPJ-JIP-JCP form tactical alliances.

Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,416


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #331 on: December 18, 2015, 06:33:06 PM »

Honestly, a split within Jiminto might be an easier way to dislodge them than getting the existing opposition back to power at this point.
Logged
Famous Mortimer
WillipsBrighton
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,010
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #332 on: December 18, 2015, 08:42:28 PM »

Just now catching up on all of this.

So is it correct to say that what is left of the JIP is mostly the Unity Party and the Unity Party is mostly former members of Your Party who favored an alliance with the far right. Only now the far right has abandoned them to reform the ORA so now they might join an alliance with the DPJ.

Meanwhile, the original members of Your Party who favored the DPJ have mostly just disappeared? Or merged into the DPJ wholesale?

and the Your Party members who wanted to keep being the Your Party are now Assembly to Energize Japan or whatever?
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,512
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #333 on: December 18, 2015, 10:16:20 PM »
« Edited: December 19, 2015, 08:31:57 AM by jaichind »

Just now catching up on all of this.

So is it correct to say that what is left of the JIP is mostly the Unity Party and the Unity Party is mostly former members of Your Party who favored an alliance with the far right. Only now the far right has abandoned them to reform the ORA so now they might join an alliance with the DPJ.

Meanwhile, the original members of Your Party who favored the DPJ have mostly just disappeared? Or merged into the DPJ wholesale?

and the Your Party members who wanted to keep being the Your Party are now Assembly to Energize Japan or whatever?

Mostly correct.  But to be precise, there were 3 streams of Right splinters.  

SPJ is a LDP extreme right splinter
YP are anti-DPJ libertarians, anti-LDP libertarians, LDP rebels, and DPJ rebels.
JRP are a Osaka LDP Splinter faction plus some DPJ and LDP rebels

Then SPJ merged into JRP.
Then UP split from YP taking with them some anti-LDP libertarians, some LDP rebels, and some DPJ rebels with a couple of anti-DPJ libertarians.
Then UP merged with JRP to form JIP while PFG split out of JRP taking with some some of the LDP extreme right that was part of SPJ.
Then YP itself dissolved.  The anti-DPJ libertarians of YP became AEJ, the rest either joined JIP or PFG and others going back to DPJ.
Then JIP split with ORA taking with it the LDP extreme right, some LDP rebels, the Osaka LDP splinter, and what is left of the anti-DPJ libertarians in JIP.  Some LDP rebels from JIP also formed ARG.  This leaves JIP with mostly anti-LDP libertarians and DPJ rebels which makes it relatively easy to ally with DPJ as long as the DPJ left faction is not in charge.
 

Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,512
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #334 on: December 18, 2015, 10:22:13 PM »

In addition to PFG losing is 5th MP recently making it no longer a valid caucus which then cuts them off from funding, the AEJ also lost a 5th MP.  One 井上義行 (Inoue Yoshiyuki) recently also quit AEJ which reduces AEJ to 4 MPs.  Just like PFG this cuts AEJ off from government funding.  ARG which was just created by former JIP members as 5 members.  It is possible AEJ might need to do a deal with ARG or PFG to get back above 5 MPs or somehow attract various center-right independent MPs to join AEJ. PFG is in the same situation. 
Logged
Famous Mortimer
WillipsBrighton
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,010
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #335 on: December 18, 2015, 11:05:20 PM »

It's just funny how the Unity Party represented the farthest right faction of Your Party (the others being the ones that favored being an independent party, and the ones who favored merging with the DPJ) and now they're aligned with the DPJ, taking the opposite position of what they used to.

Also, what happened to the Your Party founder guy. Did he just retire?

and what does AEJ stand for?
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,416


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #336 on: December 18, 2015, 11:22:04 PM »


Assembly to Energize Japan.
Logged
Famous Mortimer
WillipsBrighton
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,010
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #337 on: December 18, 2015, 11:24:01 PM »

Oops. Knew that. Meant ARG.
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,512
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #338 on: December 19, 2015, 08:28:20 AM »

ARG stands for 改革結集の会 which translates into Association of Reform Grouping.  I am making this up for now since there is no official name for ARG.

As for YP founder Yoshimi Watanabe, he still dealing with the on again and off again investigations and prosecution for a funding scandal which led to him being forced out of YP leadership back in early 2014. His own nephew is a ex-YP Upper House MP who is an independent as he choose not to join AEJ.  With the recent chaos and proliferation of splinter parties and defections on the non-LDP right there has been talk of  Watanabe making a political comeback to organize a larger Rightest bloc.  But that will have to wait until Watanabe's legal troubles are over.

In other news, as soon as Hashimoto stepped down as mayor of Osaka and officially "leaves politics" he meets with PM Abe at a Tokyo hotel.  Also attending the meeting will be Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga and Osaka Gov and ORA leader Matsui.  It is clear they are working on ORA being part of the 2/3 majority in the Upper House after 2016 elections to push through constitutional changes as well as Hashimoto's return to politics mostly at the national level either in the LDP or an LDP ally.
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,512
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #339 on: December 19, 2015, 03:24:03 PM »
« Edited: January 06, 2016, 06:51:48 AM by jaichind »

Now that all prefecture elections of 2015 are over with (except Okinawa where there is an election in 2016) it is useful to look at the state of play at politics of the prefecture level.  This is one of the pillars of LDP domination of Japanese politics.  All prefecture elections are based on SNTV  in multi-member constituency, so other than a bias toward LDP seat count in rural Japan where the district sizes are often just 1- or 2- seats, the seat distributions are PR-like.  

So looking at the % of seats in each prefecture for each of the political blocs does give a sense the relative strength of the blocs in each prefecture.  On thing that makes this analysis hard is the large number of independents elected.  But it turned out almost all of these independents are either backed by LDP-KP or the anti-LDP-KP center-left opposition blocs or in the case of LDP, a member of a minority faction of the LDP in the prefecture.  Most of the time these independents also joins the caucus of the party they are aligned with or are from.  If they are front a minority faction they the caucus of the minority faction they are from.  I grouped these independents with the party they are aligned with.

Those that ran and won as LDP or LDP backed or some minority faction of LDP I count under LDP+.  Since in all prefectures LDP and KP are allied I also show the percentage of the prefecture assembly that LDP+KP has as well.  JCP is easy since they always run on the JCP ticket.  All DPJ, PLP, SDP, or some other local center-left opposition party, plus independents allied with any of these parties I count as DPJ+.  I also include various independents without LDP+ background and not aligned with the LDP+ power structure but without clear center-left background either as part of DPJ+ as must of the votes for these members are from the DPJ+ vote base anyway. I count JIP, ORA, and post-YP independents as JIP+.  

           LDP+        KP       LDP+KP      DPJ+     JIP+      JCP    
北海道50.50%   7.92%   58.42%   37.62%   0.00%   3.96% Hokkaido
青森   62.50%   6.25%   68.75%   25.00%   0.00%   6.25% Aomori
岩手   43.75%   2.08%   45.83%   47.92%   0.00%   6.25% Iwate
宮城   54.24%   6.78%   61.02%   20.34%   5.08%  13.56% Miyagi
秋田   62.79%   2.33%   65.12%   32.56%   0.00%   2.33% Akita
山形   68.18%   2.27%   70.45%   25.00%   0.00%   4.55% Yamagata
福島   51.72%   5.17%   56.90%   29.31%   5.17%   8.62% Fukushima
茨城   71.43%   6.35%   77.78%   17.46%   0.00%   4.76% Ibaraki
栃木   58.00%   6.00%   64.00%   24.00%  10.00%   2.00% Tochigi
群馬   66.00%   6.00%   72.00%   24.00%   0.00%   4.00% Gunma
埼玉   56.99%   9.68%   66.67%   27.96%   0.00%   5.38% Saitama
千葉   57.89%   8.42%   66.32%   26.32%   2.11%   5.26% Chiba
神奈川47.62%   9.52%   57.14%   31.43%   5.71%   5.71% Kanagawa
山梨   65.79%   2.63%   68.42%   28.95%   0.00%   2.63% Yamanashi
東京   46.46% 18.11%   64.57%   14.96%   7.09% 13.39% Tokyo
新潟   66.04%   3.77%   69.81%   28.30%   0.00%   1.89% Niigata
富山   75.00%   2.50%   77.50%   20.00%   0.00%   2.50% Toyama
石川   69.77%   4.65%   74.42%   23.26%   0.00%   2.33% Ishikawa
福井   72.97%   2.70%   75.68%   21.62%   0.00%   2.70% Fukui
長野   37.93% 17.24%   55.17%   29.31%   1.72%  13.79% Nagano
岐阜   69.57%   4.35%   73.91%   21.74%   2.17%   2.17% Gifu
静岡   59.42%   7.25%   66.67%   31.88%   0.00%   1.45% Shizuoka
愛知   56.86%   5.88%   62.75%   32.35%   2.94%   1.96% Aichi
三重   41.18%   3.92%   45.10%   49.02%   1.96%   3.92% Mie
滋賀   47.73%   4.55%   52.27%   40.91%   0.00%   6.82% Shiga
京都   46.67%   8.33%   55.00%   18.33%   3.33%  23.33% Kyoto
大阪   29.55% 17.05%   46.59%    1.14%   48.86%   3.41% Osaka
兵庫   52.33% 15.12%   67.44%   16.28%  10.47%   5.81% Hyōgo
奈良   50.00%   6.82%   56.82%   20.45% 11.36%  11.36% Nara
和歌山71.43%   7.14%   78.57%   11.90%   2.38%   7.14% Wakayama
鳥取   60.00%   8.57%   68.57%   25.71%   0.00%   5.71% Tottori
島根   64.86%   5.41%   70.27%   24.32%   0.00%   5.41% Shimane
岡山   65.45%   9.09%   74.55%   20.00%   0.00%   5.45% Okayama
広島   65.63%   9.38%   75.00%   23.44%   0.00%   1.56% Hiroshima
山口   68.09% 10.64%   78.72%   17.02%   0.00%   4.26% Yamaguchi
徳島   74.36%   5.13%   79.49%   12.82%   0.00%   7.69% Tokushima
香川   70.73%   4.88%   75.61%   19.51%   0.00%   4.88% Kagawa
愛媛   61.70%   6.38%   68.09%   17.02% 12.77%   2.13% Ehime
高知   54.05%   8.11%   62.16%   27.03%   0.00% 10.81% Kōchi
福岡   59.30% 12.79%   72.09%   25.58%   0.00%   2.33% Fukuoka
佐賀   71.05%   5.26%   76.32%   18.42%   0.00%   5.26% Saga
長崎   60.87%   6.52%   67.39%   28.26%   2.17%   2.17% Nagasaki
熊本   64.58%   6.25%   70.83%   27.08%   0.00%   2.08% Kumamoto
大分   55.81%   6.98%   62.79%   32.56%   2.33%   2.33% Ōita
宮崎   64.10%   7.69%   71.79%   23.08%   0.00%   5.13% Miyazaki
鹿児島72.55%   5.88%   78.43%   17.65%   1.96%   1.96% Kagoshima
沖縄   31.25% 10.42%   41.67%   43.75%   6.25%   8.33% Okinawa
Tot    57.30%   8.12%   65.41%   25.06%   3.95%   5.62%

The domination of the LDP is clear.  Due to threshold effects especially in rural districts the LDP vote share are usually around 5% less than their seat percentage.    The result is clear to seat.  LDP-KP has a majority in nearly every prefecture, sometimes by massive margins which is especially impressive given the psudo PR nature of seat allocation.   The only prefectures where LDP-KP does not have a majority are 岩手 (Iwate), 三重 (Mie), 沖縄 (Okinawa), and 大阪(Osaka).  In the first 3 DPJ+ has the upper hand but does not have a simple majority either. Only with JCP backing does DPJ+ have a majority in these 3 prefectures.  In Osaka ORA has a plurality over LDP-KP but does not have a majority either with DPJ and JCP who are both anti-ORA having the balance of power.

All things equal LDP-KP vote share in prefecture elections tends to be around 5%-8% higher than their vote share in national elections in each prefecture in question.

Logged
Famous Mortimer
WillipsBrighton
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,010
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #340 on: December 19, 2015, 05:26:42 PM »

ARG stands for 改革結集の会 which translates into Association of Reform Grouping.  I am making this up for now since there is no official name for ARG.

As for YP founder Yoshimi Watanabe, he still dealing with the on again and off again investigations and prosecution for a funding scandal which led to him being forced out of YP leadership back in early 2014. His own nephew is a ex-YP Upper House MP who is an independent as he choose not to join AEJ.  With the recent chaos and proliferation of splinter parties and defections on the non-LDP right there has been talk of  Watanabe making a political comeback to organize a larger Rightest bloc.  But that will have to wait until Watanabe's legal troubles are over.

In other news, as soon as Hashimoto stepped down as mayor of Osaka and officially "leaves politics" he meets with PM Abe at a Tokyo hotel.  Also attending the meeting will be Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga and Osaka Gov and ORA leader Matsui.  It is clear they are working on ORA being part of the 2/3 majority in the Upper House after 2016 elections to push through constitutional changes as well as Hashimoto's return to politics mostly at the national level either in the LDP or an LDP ally.

So Hashimoto is flip flopping too. Didn't he used to be opposed to working with the LDP? Wasn't that one of the issues that caused tension between him and Ishihara? Because Ishihara was pro-LDP since all his kids are in the LDP.
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,512
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #341 on: December 20, 2015, 07:33:56 AM »
« Edited: January 04, 2016, 10:47:29 PM by jaichind »

Looking at the prefecture numbers and comparing them to the vote share in national elections also gives us some color some of the local dynamics of prefecture politics.  All things equal the vote share of LDP-KP correlate heavily with seat share of LDP-KP at the prefecture level as is for the DPJ+ bloc.  There are some exceptions which is useful to document.

a) In 北海道 (Hokkaido) DPJ+ is a bit stronger than their national vote share would suggest.  This is because the pro-LDP NPD is fairly strong at the local level.
b) In the northern prefectures 宮城 (Miyagi), 山形(Yamagata), and 福島(Fukushima), DPJ+ is weaker than their national vote share would suggest.  This is because the local JCP is very strong which eats into DPJ+ votes at the local level.
c) In 茨城 (Ibaraki) LDP+ is a bit stronger and DPJ+ a bit weaker than their national votes would suggest.   This is because the large number of 1- seat districts and weakness of DPJ in rural areas.  Also there are two rival LDP factions which are fighting it out in Ibaraki.  The minority LDP faction which is based on LDP rebel MP 中村喜四郎  (Nakamura Kishirō)  are now in the the opposition space with the DPJ+.
d) In 栃木(Tochigi) both LDP+ and DPJ+ perform a bit weaker than their national votes would suggest.  This is the legacy of a still strong post-YP operation.
e) In 神奈川(Kanagawa) DPJ+ is  stronger and LDP+ weaker than their national vote share would suggest.  A set grouping called 県政会神奈川県議会議員団 (Kanagawa Prefecture Meeting Club) of LDP rebels and ex-YP members formed to opposed LDP and formed a de facto alliance with DPJ+ managed to eat into the LDP+ vote.
f) In 東京(Tokyo) DPJ+ is weaker than their national vote share would suggest.  This is because the lcoal JCP is very strong which eats into DPJ+ votes at the local level.
g) In 新潟 (Niigata) LDP+ is much stronger and DPJ+ much weaker than their national votes would suggest. This seems to be the effect of the Tanaka clan at the national level.  The daughter and son-in-law of old LDP PM Tanaka which are now in DPJ still has some influence over Nijgata are active in at the national level.  The old Tanaka machine at the local level stayed with LDP so the DPJ+ is much weaker at the local level than their national vote total.  As the Tanaka clan passes from the scene Nijgata will trend away from DPJ+ at the national level.
h) In 石川(Ishikawa). The DPJ+ weaker than their national votes would suggest.  This is because of the very weak DPJ+ operation in rural parts of the prefecture which allows the LDP+ to completely sweep the rural areas.
i) In 長野(Nagano).  The LDP+ is much stronger than their national votes would suggest in this very weak LDP prefecture.  This is because the JIP is much weaker here locally than the national JIP and most of the JIP votes goes to local LDP+.
j) In 岐阜(Gifu)  LDP+ is much stronger and DPJ+ much weaker than their national votes would suggest. This seems to be the effect of the Tanaka clan at the national level.  This seems to be the affect of the way the prefecture district are drawn.  Most districts in Gifu, even urban ones, are drawn to be 1- 2- 3- and once in a while 4- member districts.  This makes the result a lot less PR and more like FPTP which gives an artificial number of LDP+ winners relative to other prefectures.
k) In 三重   (Mie) LDP+ is much weaker and DPJ+ much stronger than their national votes would suggest even as this is one of the strongest DPJ+ prefectures out there.  This is because there is a powerful pro-DPJ local party which dates back to the 1990s.  This local party which is called 新政みえ (or New Politics Mie) is based on the RENGO labor union alliance and eats into the LDP+ vote base, especially that of KP.
l) In 滋賀(Shiga)  LDP+ is much weaker and DPJ+ is much stronger than their national vote share would suggest.  This because the pro-DPJ governor managed to create a pro-DPJ local party called チームしが (Team) which ate into the LDP vote share.
m) In the Kinki prefectures  of 大阪 (Osaka)  and 奈良 (Nara) JIP+ is stronger than their national vote share would suggest even as they are the strongest JIP/ORA prefectures.  in Osaka JIP+ eats into both the LDP+ and DPJ+ vote bases. while in Nara JIP+ mostly eats into the LDP+ vote base.
n) In 和歌山 (Wakayama) which is also part of Kinki LDP+ is stronger than their national vote would suggest mostly because JIP+ is much weaker at the local level than their national vote would suggest so the JIP+ vote base seems to vote for LDP+.
o) In 徳島 (Tokushima) and 佐賀 (Saga) LDP+ is much stronger and DPJ+ much weaker than their national votes would suggest.  This is because there are two rival LDP factions which are fighting it out in here.  The minority LDP factions 明政会 (Clean Politics Club) in Tokushima and 県農政協議会 (Agricultural Policy Council or just JA) in Saga has pretty much taken over the opposition space from DPJ+.  DPJ+ are weak in both prefectures already at the national level and this makes them even weaker at the local level.
p) In 香川 (Kagawa)  LDP+ is stronger and DPJ+ weaker than their national votes would suggest.  This seems to be because in rural Kagawa the DPJ+ has become non-existent where it is not even challenging LDP+ in 3- seat rural areas when it should be fairly easy for DPJ+ given their vote share to win 1 of these 3 seats.
q) In 佐賀(Saga) The LDP+ is stronger and DPJ+ weaker than their national votes would suggest.  This is because the pro-farm JA (県農政協議会) faction of LDP has occupied the opposition space squeezing out the DPJ+.  
r) In 熊本(Kumamoto) DPJ+ is somewhat stronger than their national votes would suggest.  This is because of various LDP rebels seems to have formed de facto alliances with DPJ+ to take on the LDP+ in rural areas.
s) In 沖縄 (Okinawa)  DPJ+ is a lot stronger than their national vote share would suggest even as this is one of the weakest prefectures for LDP.  This is because the pro-LDP pro-JCP OSMP is fairly strong at the local level.  The saving grace for LDP+ is that the JIP+ in Okinawa which became ORA are aligned with LDP+ to counter OSMP.
 
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,512
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #342 on: December 21, 2015, 06:52:10 AM »

FPG or Party of Future Generations (次世代の党)  has changed its name to 日本のこころを大切にする党 which roughly translates to Party to Cherish the Japanese Mind.



I am not sure when if ever they will come out with the English name of the party.  I  guess for now I have  to label them PCJM.  I really doubt this will turn the party around.  
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,263
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #343 on: December 21, 2015, 07:15:10 AM »

Why do the Japanese right give their parties such horrendously creepy names?
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,512
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #344 on: December 21, 2015, 02:54:54 PM »

Why do the Japanese right give their parties such horrendously creepy names?

Because they like to use terminology used by the government back in the 1930s and early 1940s. Te basic idea is this: The Japanese hawkish right reject the history of post-1945 Japan.  They feel that what happen to Japan in 1945 was unjust and that the Japanese government in the 1930s and 1940s were merely doing what was needed to survive and was no different from what European state were doing.   They cannot come out and say things without hurting their own political prospects as well as angering USA.  So they get around this by using terminology that were uniquely prominent in the 1930s and 1940s.  Words like Cherish, Japanese Mind, and Next generation were prominent in government lexicon in the pre-1945 era.  The Abe administration does this too.  In a lot of its policy documents it keeps on using the word 億 (ichi oku) which means 100 million in Kanji/Chinese.  Back in the 1930s 1940s the Japanese government kept on using ichi oku to refer to the common fate of the 100 million Japanese.  After the war this term pretty much disappeared.  Now it is back.  These words are a signal to the hawkish right electorate that the dream is alive, even if it is underground. 
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,263
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #345 on: December 21, 2015, 03:32:54 PM »

What are the demographics of this hawk revival electorate? Old? young? rich or poor? urban or rural? etc.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,416


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #346 on: December 21, 2015, 07:11:46 PM »
« Edited: December 21, 2015, 07:13:21 PM by What wilt thou give me for my sucking? »

Younger than you'd expect but not overwhelmingly so, more urban than you'd expect but not overwhelmingly so, not sure about class. A geriatric mikan farmer from Shikoku might have ultranationalist tendencies, but he is not the activist 'base' for such things.
Logged
Sol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,146
Bosnia and Herzegovina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #347 on: December 21, 2015, 07:47:00 PM »

Are there particular geographic areas that have large concentrations of such stinkbats?
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,512
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #348 on: December 21, 2015, 09:24:16 PM »

Are there particular geographic areas that have large concentrations of such stinkbats?

One clue would be to look at where the FPG and now PCJM PR votes came from in 2014.  They polled well in Tokyo (mostly due to Ishihara) and 岡山(Okayama) where PFG founder 平沼 赳夫( Hiranuma Takeo) is from.  Hiranuma is now back in LDP.  Another place where it did well is in rural 愛媛(Ehime) for some unknown reason.  Overall it does well in urban areas around Greater Tokyo but has circles of strength in the declining rural South.

Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,512
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #349 on: December 21, 2015, 09:29:01 PM »

So Hashimoto is flip flopping too. Didn't he used to be opposed to working with the LDP? Wasn't that one of the issues that caused tension between him and Ishihara? Because Ishihara was pro-LDP since all his kids are in the LDP.

Well, Hashimoto had sensed that DPJ back in 2013 was weak so he wanted to merge JRP with UP and move toward the center so he can capture the opposition space from DPJ and eventually displace LDP+KP as the ruling party.  Ishihara was opposed to this so they split.  Then while DPJ did not do well in 2014 elections they did emerge stronger than JIP, Hashimoto could see that his plans will not work out.  So he decided to capture the Far Right vote to be a critical swing bloc to help LDP+KP to get to 2/3 majority in Upper House to push up his price on the political market.  This did not jive with the JIP moderates who wanted to align with DPJ so ergo there had to be a split. 
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 ... 25  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.079 seconds with 12 queries.