CO: Quinnipiac University: Beauprez+4
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 08:38:06 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  CO: Quinnipiac University: Beauprez+4
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: CO: Quinnipiac University: Beauprez+4  (Read 3006 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 15, 2014, 07:04:43 AM »

New Poll: Colorado Governor by Quinnipiac University on 2014-10-13

Summary: D: 42%, R: 46%, I: 6%, U: 6%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2014, 09:56:20 AM »

Considering their last poll had him up double digits, not really as bad as it looks.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,875


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 15, 2014, 10:22:39 AM »

Yup, huge momentum for Hickenlooper.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,681
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 15, 2014, 10:46:46 AM »

I'm beginning to think that Hickenloopeer will be fine. Udall just ran a really bad campaign, I think.
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,918
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 15, 2014, 10:50:07 AM »

Explain why this is good Hick news? Beauprez still has a lead
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,324
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 15, 2014, 10:55:57 AM »

Explain why this is good Hick news? Beauprez still has a lead

Because the last Q poll had him down 10.
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 15, 2014, 11:01:29 AM »

Explain why this is good Hick news? Beauprez still has a lead

Because the last Q poll had him down 10.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regression_toward_the_mean

Unless you actually think Quinnipiac has a 12 point House effect this cycle...
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,681
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 15, 2014, 11:08:33 AM »

That seems about right.
Explain why this is good Hick news? Beauprez still has a lead

Because the last Q poll had him down 10.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regression_toward_the_mean

Unless you actually think Quinnipiac has a 12 point House effect this cycle...
Logged
backtored
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 498
Vatican City State


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 15, 2014, 11:13:40 AM »

I'd rather have Hick's seat than Udall's.  But my hunch is that if Gardner wins, and he probably will, then Beauprez wins, too. I think that we are all still waiting to see what happens with all e-mail balloting. Best case for Hick is a 1-3 point squeaker win. But most likely the race is just tied and will come down to turnout. Gardner's coattails will help the GOP.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,324
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 15, 2014, 11:29:05 AM »

Explain why this is good Hick news? Beauprez still has a lead

Because the last Q poll had him down 10.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regression_toward_the_mean

Unless you actually think Quinnipiac has a 12 point House effect this cycle...

I did think that the Beauprez +10 was an outlier, but I'm just saying that's why this poll is beeing construed as good news for Democrats.
Logged
Anti Democrat Democrat Club
SawxDem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,093
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 15, 2014, 11:30:14 AM »

I'd rather have Hick's seat than Udall's.  But my hunch is that if Gardner wins, and he probably will, then Beauprez wins, too. I think that we are all still waiting to see what happens with all e-mail balloting. Best case for Hick is a 1-3 point squeaker win. But most likely the race is just tied and will come down to turnout. Gardner's coattails will help the GOP.

Except Gardner is a much stronger candidate running against someone who is weaker than Hick.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 15, 2014, 11:30:35 AM »

I'm amazed Bob Beauprez, who lost by such a significant amount in 2006, is on the verge of taking the Colorado Governorship.
Logged
backtored
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 498
Vatican City State


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 15, 2014, 01:17:27 PM »

I'd rather have Hick's seat than Udall's.  But my hunch is that if Gardner wins, and he probably will, then Beauprez wins, too. I think that we are all still waiting to see what happens with all e-mail balloting. Best case for Hick is a 1-3 point squeaker win. But most likely the race is just tied and will come down to turnout. Gardner's coattails will help the GOP.

Except Gardner is a much stronger candidate running against someone who is weaker than Hick.

I don't agree with that at all. What makes you say that?
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,918
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 15, 2014, 01:34:13 PM »

I'd rather have Hick's seat than Udall's.  But my hunch is that if Gardner wins, and he probably will, then Beauprez wins, too. I think that we are all still waiting to see what happens with all e-mail balloting. Best case for Hick is a 1-3 point squeaker win. But most likely the race is just tied and will come down to turnout. Gardner's coattails will help the GOP.

Except Gardner is a much stronger candidate running against someone who is weaker than Hick.


I don't agree with that at all. What makes you say that?

Let me let you in on a secret. Sawx is a bit of a hack
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,875


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 15, 2014, 01:35:26 PM »

It not hackish to say that Gardner is a stronger candidate than Beauprez and Udall has run a weaker campaign than Hickenlooper. Shut up.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 15, 2014, 01:40:48 PM »

It not hackish to say that Gardner is a stronger candidate than Beauprez and Udall has run a weaker campaign than Hickenlooper. Shut up.

It's not only not hackish, it's actually the way things are.
Logged
Anti Democrat Democrat Club
SawxDem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,093
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 15, 2014, 01:57:15 PM »
« Edited: October 15, 2014, 02:11:07 PM by Northeast Assemblyman Sawx for Governor »

I'd rather have Hick's seat than Udall's.  But my hunch is that if Gardner wins, and he probably will, then Beauprez wins, too. I think that we are all still waiting to see what happens with all e-mail balloting. Best case for Hick is a 1-3 point squeaker win. But most likely the race is just tied and will come down to turnout. Gardner's coattails will help the GOP.

Except Gardner is a much stronger candidate running against someone who is weaker than Hick.


I don't agree with that at all. What makes you say that?

Let me let you in on a secret. Sawx is a bit of a hack

Never mind that I've said that Gardner would win if he could cover up his more socially conservative views (which he does have, for the record) from the moment he entered the race. Never mind that Beauprez said the exact same comments as Mitt Romney did in his infamous 47% video, got embarrassed by Bill Ritter eight years ago, and that he essentially said that he didn't believe Obama was born here. Never mind that Gardner has proven himself to actually have the discipline to portray himself as socially moderate, probably would have won by more than 11 in his old district had the Constitution Party not run another candidate, and never mind that he can actually shut the f**k up unlike Beauprez, I'm a hack because THE POLLS SAID SO. Even though Quinnipiac has a shoddy track record in Colorado, and polls usually come around to the Democrats again.

You know what? People like you are why this section of the board is an utter sh*tshow that's only saving grace is that it's not The Great Atlas Hillaryjerk (better known as the 2016 board). You have the hacks (from both sides, might I add) on both sides, but as far as elections goes, you're so divorced from reality that you make Oldiesfreak look like a moderate hero. Maybe if you think everyone who disagrees with you is a hack, you should take some time to stop masturbating to Paul Ryan's workout pictures and take a good look at yourself.

Logged
backtored
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 498
Vatican City State


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 15, 2014, 02:54:51 PM »
« Edited: October 15, 2014, 02:58:42 PM by backtored »

It not hackish to say that Gardner is a stronger candidate than Beauprez and Udall has run a weaker campaign than Hickenlooper. Shut up.

It's not only not hackish, it's actually the way things are.

 I actually think that Beauprez is a great candidate who has run a tremendous campaign. The fact that you're surprised about the tightness of the gubernatorial race is what I find truly surprising--because knowing how vulnerable Hick has been and how solid Beauprez is, I'm not at all surprised.
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,803
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 15, 2014, 04:23:56 PM »

I'd rather have Hick's seat than Udall's.  But my hunch is that if Gardner wins, and he probably will, then Beauprez wins, too. I think that we are all still waiting to see what happens with all e-mail balloting. Best case for Hick is a 1-3 point squeaker win. But most likely the race is just tied and will come down to turnout. Gardner's coattails will help the GOP.

Except Gardner is a much stronger candidate running against someone who is weaker than Hick.


I don't agree with that at all. What makes you say that?

Let me let you in on a secret. Sawx is a bit of a hack

OK, FreedomHack.
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,918
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 15, 2014, 04:48:54 PM »

I'd rather have Hick's seat than Udall's.  But my hunch is that if Gardner wins, and he probably will, then Beauprez wins, too. I think that we are all still waiting to see what happens with all e-mail balloting. Best case for Hick is a 1-3 point squeaker win. But most likely the race is just tied and will come down to turnout. Gardner's coattails will help the GOP.

Except Gardner is a much stronger candidate running against someone who is weaker than Hick.


I don't agree with that at all. What makes you say that?

Let me let you in on a secret. Sawx is a bit of a hack

OK, FreedomHack.

I'll admit, that was pretty good
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 15, 2014, 08:56:21 PM »

It not hackish to say that Gardner is a stronger candidate than Beauprez and Udall has run a weaker campaign than Hickenlooper. Shut up.

It's not only not hackish, it's actually the way things are.

Doesn't pretty much everyone agree with those two observations regardless of political views?
Logged
backtored
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 498
Vatican City State


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: October 15, 2014, 08:59:14 PM »

It not hackish to say that Gardner is a stronger candidate than Beauprez and Udall has run a weaker campaign than Hickenlooper. Shut up.

It's not only not hackish, it's actually the way things are.

Doesn't pretty much everyone agree with those two observations regardless of political views?

No.
Logged
KCDem
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,928


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: October 15, 2014, 08:59:28 PM »

It not hackish to say that Gardner is a stronger candidate than Beauprez and Udall has run a weaker campaign than Hickenlooper. Shut up.

It's not only not hackish, it's actually the way things are.

Doesn't pretty much everyone agree with those two observations regardless of political views?

Except the clueless "independent" from Connecticut...
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,918
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: October 15, 2014, 09:08:36 PM »

It not hackish to say that Gardner is a stronger candidate than Beauprez and Udall has run a weaker campaign than Hickenlooper. Shut up.

It's not only not hackish, it's actually the way things are.

Doesn't pretty much everyone agree with those two observations regardless of political views?

Except the clueless "independent" from Connecticut...

Will somebody just put a binky in this guy's mouth already
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: October 15, 2014, 09:10:03 PM »

It not hackish to say that Gardner is a stronger candidate than Beauprez and Udall has run a weaker campaign than Hickenlooper. Shut up.

It's not only not hackish, it's actually the way things are.

Doesn't pretty much everyone agree with those two observations regardless of political views?

No.

What do you disagree with?
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.059 seconds with 14 queries.