NC: PPP: Hagan +3 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 07:16:20 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  2014 Senatorial Election Polls
  NC: PPP: Hagan +3 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NC: PPP: Hagan +3  (Read 6274 times)
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,594
United States


« on: October 20, 2014, 11:00:45 AM »

As if we needed it, more confirmation that Hagan is leading and Gravis is trash.
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,594
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 20, 2014, 11:44:43 AM »

The North Carolina firewall is holding!!

Firewall? From what? Losing the Senate 52-48 or 53-47 vs. 54-46?

The fact that this NC race is this close with PPP, who has favored the Ds this cycle, should not be encouraging to any red avatar.

Looks like this race has gone from strong lean D to slight lean D. Tillis could win.

Proof, please.

Iowa - PPP D+1, Other polling R+1 to R+4
LA - PPP D+8, Other polling D+3 to R+4
KS - PPP I+3, Other polling (outside of obvious Rasmussen outlier) Tie to R+5

This particular poll seems more in line with the state of the race, however.
The Iowa poll was for a partisan group, so you can't really count that as the same their non-partisan polls.  

The only poll that has Roberts at +5 was Fox news, which is (needless to say) probably biased itself.  Every other recent poll has had this at roughly a tie, which is probably where the race is right now.

Citing individual cases of PPP being a few points more Democratic than other polls is not enough to statistically determine a bias.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 14 queries.