NH: YouGov: Shaheen leads by three in poll for UMass Amherst

[New_Conservative]

Republicans surely have not pulled out of New Hampshire, in the Providence media market I see more New Hampshire ads than Rhode Island or Massachusetts ads, and they are all for the Brown-Shaheen race.

[Recalcuate]

Brown's internals show him down 9 FWIW

So all that third-party money is flowing out of New Hampshire to other states, right? NH is getting abandoned by the Republicans like Michigan? Give me a break.

Why don't you take your 59-post experience and leave. You know nothing about politics. Go do your algebra homework.

Sorry, KC Dem, I've moved on to trigonometry. Pre-Calculus is next. Seriously?

We're supposed to believe a "tweet" from a Democrat about how a "Republican internal" has Brown is losing a the race by nine where every pollster that has queried the state in October has Brown down by six or less.

Meanwhile, millions are spent on ads. Come on guys, I've got a bridge to sell you, if you believe that. If this were true, the Republican money would have moved elsewhere, much like it did in Michigan.

Again, this is Shaheen's race to lose at this point. Brown has simply made it interesting.

[KCDem]

Brown's internals show him down 9 FWIW

So all that third-party money is flowing out of New Hampshire to other states, right? NH is getting abandoned by the Republicans like Michigan? Give me a break.

Why don't you take your 59-post experience and leave. You know nothing about politics. Go do your algebra homework.

Sorry, KC Dem, I've moved on to trigonometry. Pre-Calculus is next. Seriously?

We're supposed to believe a "tweet" from a Democrat about how a "Republican internal" has Brown is losing a the race by nine where every pollster that has queried the state in October has Brown down by six or less.

Meanwhile, millions are spent on ads. Come on guys, I've got a bridge to sell you, if you believe that. If this were true, the Republican money would have moved elsewhere, much like it did in Michigan.

Again, this is Shaheen's race to lose at this point. Brown has simply made it interesting.

The Republican money is still in NH because the air isn't saturated and the race is closer than Michigan. The Republicans are running out of ways to take the Senate so they are desperately trying to compete is races that favor the Democrats.

[New_Conservative]

Brown's internals show him down 9 FWIW

So all that third-party money is flowing out of New Hampshire to other states, right? NH is getting abandoned by the Republicans like Michigan? Give me a break.

Why don't you take your 59-post experience and leave. You know nothing about politics. Go do your algebra homework.

Sorry, KC Dem, I've moved on to trigonometry. Pre-Calculus is next. Seriously?

We're supposed to believe a "tweet" from a Democrat about how a "Republican internal" has Brown is losing a the race by nine where every pollster that has queried the state in October has Brown down by six or less.

Meanwhile, millions are spent on ads. Come on guys, I've got a bridge to sell you, if you believe that. If this were true, the Republican money would have moved elsewhere, much like it did in Michigan.

Again, this is Shaheen's race to lose at this point. Brown has simply made it interesting.

[Bacon King]

KCDem stop being a turd

[impactreps]

Brown's internals show him down 9 FWIW

So all that third-party money is flowing out of New Hampshire to other states, right? NH is getting abandoned by the Republicans like Michigan? Give me a break.

Why don't you take your 59-post experience and leave. You know nothing about politics. Go do your algebra homework.

Sorry, KC Dem, I've moved on to trigonometry. Pre-Calculus is next. Seriously?

We're supposed to believe a "tweet" from a Democrat about how a "Republican internal" has Brown is losing a the race by nine where every pollster that has queried the state in October has Brown down by six or less.

Meanwhile, millions are spent on ads. Come on guys, I've got a bridge to sell you, if you believe that. If this were true, the Republican money would have moved elsewhere, much like it did in Michigan.

Again, this is Shaheen's race to lose at this point. Brown has simply made it interesting.

The Republican money is still in NH because the air isn't saturated and the race is closer than Michigan. The Republicans are running out of ways to take the Senate so they are desperately trying to compete is races that favor the Democrats.

Is that why the election models all favor a GOP Senate by a margins from 62 to 93%. Look, this is going to be a coin-flip right until the last polls close. Unlike 2006 or 2010, the close races are not going to break in favor of one party. Democrats and Republicans will split the close states. The problem for Dems is that most of the close states are in purple or light blue states. Most of the red states are moving in the GOP's direction further and further away from 'toss-up' status. I would say Republicans are favored to win the Senate, but it's not a sure thing.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/10/20/republicans-chances-of-winning-the-senate-majority-keep-getting-better/

[KCDem]

KCDem stop being a turd

It's hard not to be when you're arguing with hairy sphincters.

[Recalcuate]

Brown's internals show him down 9 FWIW

So all that third-party money is flowing out of New Hampshire to other states, right? NH is getting abandoned by the Republicans like Michigan? Give me a break.

Why don't you take your 59-post experience and leave. You know nothing about politics. Go do your algebra homework.

Sorry, KC Dem, I've moved on to trigonometry. Pre-Calculus is next. Seriously?

We're supposed to believe a "tweet" from a Democrat about how a "Republican internal" has Brown is losing a the race by nine where every pollster that has queried the state in October has Brown down by six or less.

Meanwhile, millions are spent on ads. Come on guys, I've got a bridge to sell you, if you believe that. If this were true, the Republican money would have moved elsewhere, much like it did in Michigan.

Again, this is Shaheen's race to lose at this point. Brown has simply made it interesting.

The Republican money is still in NH because the air isn't saturated and the race is closer than Michigan. The Republicans are running out of ways to take the Senate so they are desperately trying to compete is races that favor the Democrats.

You'd make a great Baghdad Bob, you know that?

538 has the Republicans with a 63-37 chance of taking the Senate.
The New York Times has it at 66-34.
The Washington Post has it at like 93%.

The later two aren't exactly Republican-leaning publications.

It must be that algebra that you claim I am taking, BUT there seems like there's math and what you truly believe in your head.

IF Brown wins (and that's a huge IF), the Republicans will have 54 or 55 Senators in the next Congress. You can bank on that. This is not a must-have state for the Republicans right now.

And I'll say it again. These polls show tightening in the New Hampshire Senate race. It's still Shaheen's race to lose.

[Rockefeller GOP]

KCDem stop being a turd

[free my dawg]

.....

Guys, polls with a sample size of 300 and a margin of error of 7% are not good. I don't care who is leading. Stop embarrassing yourselves by whining about every perceived instance of hackery.

[Mr. Reactionary]

KCDem stop being a turd

KCDem, I don't see how you can attack someone for having fewer posts than you when a majority of your posts are "Junk Poll!" or "Dominating!".