Democracy Corps/WVWVAF: Hillary up 6 vs. Romney, up 12 vs. Bush
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 02:14:20 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Democracy Corps/WVWVAF: Hillary up 6 vs. Romney, up 12 vs. Bush
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Democracy Corps/WVWVAF: Hillary up 6 vs. Romney, up 12 vs. Bush  (Read 1692 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 16, 2015, 02:32:14 PM »

Democracy Corps (D) for Women’s Voices Women Vote Action Fund (D, I guess):

49% Clinton
43% Romney

Clinton leads Dems 92-3 and Indies 43-40. Romney leads among Reps 90-4.

52% Clinton
40% Bush

Clinton leads Dems 95-4 and Indies 46-38. Bush leads among Reps 87-3.

Obama approval:

48-48 (up from 44-50 in their November poll)

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.wvwvaf.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/2016VoterSurvey-GQRR-DCorps-WVWVAF-201501SLIDES.pdf
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 16, 2015, 02:45:50 PM »

927 of the 950 likely voters polled said they voted in the 2012 election (the other 23 registered to vote since then).

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

...

Looks like Hillary is not doing all too hot against Mitty, relative to Obama.
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 16, 2015, 03:00:58 PM »

927 of the 950 likely voters polled said they voted in the 2012 election (the other 23 registered to vote since then).

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

...

Looks like Hillary is not doing all too hot against Mitty, relative to Obama.
Well, her margin is 1 point worse, which is certainly within the MoE.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,664
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 16, 2015, 03:56:33 PM »

I dont think we are gonna win WVa, we should spend our money in CO and OH. But, WVA is a microcosum of EAST OHIO, she definately plays well there, in OHIO.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 16, 2015, 04:26:13 PM »

I dont think we are gonna win WVa, we should spend our money in CO and OH. But, WVA is a microcosum of EAST OHIO, she definately plays well there, in OHIO.

wut
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 16, 2015, 04:33:52 PM »

Strong enough -- but this sounds like a biased pollster.  
Logged
SWE
SomebodyWhoExists
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,309
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 16, 2015, 05:19:28 PM »

I dont think we are gonna win WVa, we should spend our money in CO and OH. But, WVA is a microcosum of EAST OHIO, she definately plays well there, in OHIO.
agreed
Logged
Senator Cris
Cris
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,613
Italy


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 16, 2015, 05:23:30 PM »

I dont think we are gonna win WVa, we should spend our money in CO and OH. But, WVA is a microcosum of EAST OHIO, she definately plays well there, in OHIO.
It's a national survey.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,664
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 17, 2015, 07:39:47 AM »

Let it put it this way, Clinton may very well put the WVA governor race in play, should Manchin run, but OHIO and CO, are winnable and the bellweathers, WVA will be ignored, at the presidential level.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 17, 2015, 07:53:07 AM »

Let it put it this way, Clinton may very well put the WVA governor race in play, should Manchin run, but OHIO and CO, are winnable and the bellweathers, WVA will be ignored, at the presidential level.

Do you understand what this thread is about?
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 17, 2015, 10:07:02 AM »

Let it put it this way, Clinton may very well put the WVA governor race in play, should Manchin run, but OHIO and CO, are winnable and the bellweathers, WVA will be ignored, at the presidential level.
I know it looks like this is a poll of West Virginia because 'WV' is in the thread title twice, but its really not. 
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: January 17, 2015, 11:27:36 AM »

Republicans would have to win Indies by a pretty substantial margin to offset the partisan gap. Romney won them by 5 in 2012.
Logged
Württemberger
Rookie
**
Posts: 41
Germany
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: January 18, 2015, 03:28:42 PM »

She only leads Romney by 6 points? That's not a good sign for her.
Logged
Flake
Flo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: January 18, 2015, 03:40:14 PM »

She only leads Romney by 6 points? That's not a good sign for her.

Considering both have run national campaigns and are known to every active voter, I think it's a great sign.
Logged
Württemberger
Rookie
**
Posts: 41
Germany
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: January 18, 2015, 03:45:14 PM »

She only leads Romney by 6 points? That's not a good sign for her.

Considering both have run national campaigns and are known to every active voter, I think it's a great sign.

In that regard, yes. But considering the fact that Romney lost the election by 4 points to Obama and she is much more popular than he is, it says much about her "expand the map" strategy.
Logged
Nichlemn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,920


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: January 18, 2015, 06:33:50 PM »

Let it put it this way, Clinton may very well put the WVA governor race in play, should Manchin run, but OHIO and CO, are winnable and the bellweathers, WVA will be ignored, at the presidential level.
I know it looks like this is a poll of West Virginia because 'WV' is in the thread title twice, but its really not. 

I thought this too initially. It's a pretty bad name for the group nonetheless. Were "Women's Voices Fund" and "Women Vote Action Fund" both taken?
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: January 19, 2015, 12:55:46 AM »
« Edited: January 23, 2015, 12:01:38 AM by pbrower2a »

She only leads Romney by 6 points? That's not a good sign for her.

Romney already has name recognition, and he won 47% of the vote in 2012. He will need more than 47% of the vote, and unlike the case with Jeb Bush, 47% could be his ceiling.

A 12-point gap against somewhat-less-well-known Jeb Bush in contrast suggests a floor of 44% for him. A floor of 44% certainly beats a ceiling of 47%.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 12 queries.