Quinnipiac national: Romney leads Clinton by 1, but she leads all other Repubs

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Gosh how electable, trailing against the one Republican almost as well known as her. And leading by a whole point against Christie, who is openly corrupt.  We'd better nominate her instead of a real Democrat because she's a real winner.

[IceSpear]

Gosh how electable, trailing against the one Republican almost as well known as her. And leading by a whole point against Christie, who is openly corrupt.  We'd better nominate her instead of a real Democrat because she's a real winner.

Any other Democrat would be DoA in a 74% white and R+1 electorate (unless the Republican was a basket case), so the fact that she's leading most of them actually proves the electability point.

[BlueSwan]

As a Hillary supporter, I gotta admit that this is a bad poll for her. And it's coming after a slew of disappointing polls. Just goes to show that absolutely nothing has been decided. In this political climate any presidential election is gonna be somewhat close, unless either side nominates a joke candidate, which is unlikely.

[KCDem]

Gosh how electable, trailing against the one Republican almost as well known as her. And leading by a whole point against Christie, who is openly corrupt.  We'd better nominate her instead of a real Democrat because she's a real winner.

Quit your true leftist trolling. Your opinions are irrelevant in a party primary. Get lost.

[Holmes]

Or it just shows that this is a junk poll!

This is the first one of a long series of "junk polls" until November 2016?

Yup! All polls 2 years out are junk!

If you want to know where the electorate is at now, it's not junk.

[Devils30]

It's also at 14% age 18-29, 2012 was 19% and even 2004 was 17%. Not a chance 14% is the number, not a chance. 65 and older is also 22% and was 16% in 2012. Clearly this poll is weighted toward the last midterm if you look at the age, racial demographics. Hillary up 5 on Jeb, Paul with midterm voters isn't terrible.

[Rockefeller GOP]

Gosh how electable, trailing against the one Republican almost as well known as her. And leading by a whole point against Christie, who is openly corrupt.  We'd better nominate her instead of a real Democrat because she's a real winner.

Christie is openly corrupt?  News to me.

Rachel Maddow, is that you??

[KCDem]

Or it just shows that this is a junk poll!

This is the first one of a long series of "junk polls" until November 2016?

Yup! All polls 2 years out are junk!

If you want to know where the electorate is at now, it's not junk.

The electorate of this poll isn't the electorate that will vote in November, 2016. #fact

[DS0816]

Demographic breakdown:
White 74%    LOLOLOLOL
Black 12%
Hispanic 7%

Party ID: R + 1 LOLOLOLOLOL

And Hillary still leads the troll candidates! Glorious news!

It's more than likely that after the catastrophic loss of the Democrats recently, fewer people are now self-ID-ing as "Democrats" and more people say "Indy".

This is backed up with the fact that the party image of the Dem. Party is now a record low (some polls even have the GOP rated slightly more favorable now).

Or it just shows that this is a junk poll! Especially with the ridiculously high white response %

^ THIS ! ^

[Lincoln Republican]

So Hillary isn't the unstoppable juggernaut Dems once thought, especially against Mitt.

Fortunately for her, Mitt will not be running.

But it might be entertaining seeing two 70 year olds battling it out.

[IceSpear]

Looks like those who called this a junk poll/outlier were correct.

[Senator Cris]

Looks like those who called this a junk poll/outlier were correct.

I think you are right, but not only for the Quinnipiac poll. The majority of polls are RV polls.

[Senate Minority Leader Lord Voldemort]

I didn't realize this thread was resurrected, and fell out of my chair when I saw a couple posts from KCDem.