Rasmussen: Romney ahead by double-digits nationally
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 07:44:33 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  Rasmussen: Romney ahead by double-digits nationally
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Rasmussen: Romney ahead by double-digits nationally  (Read 1088 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 23, 2015, 11:59:17 AM »

24% Romney
13% Bush
12% Carson
11% Walker
  7% Paul
  7% Christie
  5% Rubio
  5% Perry
  4% Others
12% Undecided

The survey of 787 Likely Republican Voters was conducted on January 18-19, 2015 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3.5 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/romney_leads_the_gop_pack_for_now
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2015, 12:01:41 PM »

They included Perry and Rubio but not Cruz or Huckabee?
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2015, 12:30:17 PM »

They included Perry and Rubio but not Cruz or Huckabee?

Ras has a knack for omitting random people in their polls.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2015, 12:34:15 PM »

Disappointed to see the only good candidate so low and Bush and Romney in first. What a disaster of a party.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 26, 2015, 09:34:56 PM »

They also polled the Democratic side, but looks like they may have just tested Clinton vs. Warren:

link

Clinton 62%
Warren 22%
Logged
BlueSwan
blueswan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,365
Denmark


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -7.30

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 29, 2015, 02:41:36 AM »

Another good poll for Walker. If Romney and Bush destroy each other, he could end up the consensus candidate.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 29, 2015, 09:14:11 AM »

OK, out of pure curiosity, I did something kind of silly: I went through all of the national and statewide polls from this month, and calculated the median value for each candidate, throwing together national polls and state polls in IA, NH, SC, PA, and NJ*.  Even though all those states are different, I figured that throwing them in the same pot and taking the median along with the national numbers would give a decent idea of where things are nationally.  I find:

Romney 20%
Bush 13%
Carson 8.5%
Huckabee 8%
Walker 8%
Christie 7%
Paul 7%
Cruz 6.5%
Rubio 3.5%
Perry 2.5%
[Omitting candidates like Jindal and Santorum who aren't included in most of the polls.]

I think the untold story of the polls this month is Walker.  A few months ago, he had the lowest name recognition of anyone in the field (actually, he still might, if you don't count folks like Kasich and Pence, who usually aren't included in these polls), and was regularly getting #s in the 2-4% range.  Now he typically hits high single digits, if not double digits, and usually outperforms folks like Christie, Paul, and Cruz.

* [I used 9 polls total.  Four national polls plus one poll each from the five states I mentioned.  Several of these are from pretty bad pollsters, but I'm counting on the fact that by taking the median, you're not too corrupted by outliers.]
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 29, 2015, 10:47:45 AM »

OK, out of pure curiosity, I did something kind of silly: I went through all of the national and statewide polls from this month, and calculated the median value for each candidate, throwing together national polls and state polls in IA, NH, SC, PA, and NJ*.  Even though all those states are different, I figured that throwing them in the same pot and taking the median along with the national numbers would give a decent idea of where things are nationally.  I find:

Romney 20%
Bush 13%
Carson 8.5%
Huckabee 8%
Walker 8%
Christie 7%
Paul 7%
Cruz 6.5%
Rubio 3.5%
Perry 2.5%
[Omitting candidates like Jindal and Santorum who aren't included in most of the polls.]

I think the untold story of the polls this month is Walker.  A few months ago, he had the lowest name recognition of anyone in the field (actually, he still might, if you don't count folks like Kasich and Pence, who usually aren't included in these polls), and was regularly getting #s in the 2-4% range.  Now he typically hits high single digits, if not double digits, and usually outperforms folks like Christie, Paul, and Cruz.

* [I used 9 polls total.  Four national polls plus one poll each from the five states I mentioned.  Several of these are from pretty bad pollsters, but I'm counting on the fact that by taking the median, you're not too corrupted by outliers.]

IMO, it's only a matter of time before Walker becomes a top tier contender. There's no reason for anyone in the GOP (except the tiny dying moderate wing) to dislike him. The same can't be said for any other candidate, except maybe Pence. But he's just Walker-lite.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.215 seconds with 14 queries.