ABC/WaPo national poll: Hillary ahead by 14% and more
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 03:56:27 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  ABC/WaPo national poll: Hillary ahead by 14% and more
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: ABC/WaPo national poll: Hillary ahead by 14% and more  (Read 4784 times)
Former Democrat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 250
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 02, 2015, 12:31:34 PM »

PRESIDENT – NATIONAL (ABC/WaPo)
Hillary Clinton (D) 54%
Jeb Bush (R) 40%

Hillary Clinton (D) 58%
Ted Cruz (R) 37%

Hillary Clinton (D) 55%
Scott Walker (R) 38%

Hillary Clinton (D) 55%
Marco Rubio (R) 38%

https://strehlspresidentialelection2016.wordpress.com/
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,357
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 02, 2015, 12:44:25 PM »

Stop linking to your blog or you will get banned.
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,577
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 02, 2015, 12:48:55 PM »

Stop linking to your blog or you will get banned.
1) you're not a mod, you can't claim full knowledge if will and won't merit a ban.
2) why does it even matter? It's not as if he's making up polls that don't exist.
Logged
Former Democrat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 250
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 02, 2015, 12:52:25 PM »

why ban me?Huh??
 the polls are real and I posting them first

an the april fooler who works today
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,357
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 02, 2015, 12:53:40 PM »
« Edited: April 02, 2015, 12:58:28 PM by Monarch »

http://www.washingtonpost.com/page/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2015/04/02/National-Politics/Polling/release_393.xml

Favorable Ratings
Hillary Clinton +3 (49/46)
Walker -7 (23/30)
Paul -13 (29/42)
Rubio -14 (24/38)
Jeb Bush -20 (33/53)
Cruz -20 (25/45)

Approval Ratings
Bill Clinton +50 (73/23)
Obama 0 (47/47)
George W. Bush -4 (47/51)
Democrats in Congress -19 (38/57)
Republicans in Congress -41 (27/68)

Hillary Clinton _____, yes or no?
Strong Leader +32 (64/32)
New Ideas +16 (55/39)
Shares Your Values +1 (48/47)
Trustworthy 0 (46/46)
Understands You -1 (47/48)

Do you want experience or a new direction in the next President?
Experience 55%
A new direction 37


Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,357
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 02, 2015, 12:54:53 PM »
« Edited: April 02, 2015, 12:56:25 PM by Monarch »

Stop linking to your blog or you will get banned.
1) you're not a mod, you can't claim full knowledge if will and won't merit a ban.
2) why does it even matter? It's not as if he's making up polls that don't exist.

I have been here long enough. Advertising a blog that provides no critical analysis and simply siphon ad dollars will get him banned.

why ban me?Huh??
 the polls are real and I posting them first

an the april fooler who works today

The polls are not your content and you are not providing any information on top of the primary source. In fact, as my post above shows, you provided less content than the link of the primary source. jao
Logged
Frozen Sky Ever Why
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,610
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 02, 2015, 03:17:10 PM »

These national polls are worthless. We need at least RV.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 02, 2015, 03:37:58 PM »

Well, so much for the Hillary is dooommmmedddddd narrative. People really need to learn not to overreact to single polls.

These national polls are worthless. We need at least RV.

This is among RVs, according to RCP anyway.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 02, 2015, 03:41:05 PM »

http://www.washingtonpost.com/page/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2015/04/02/National-Politics/Polling/release_393.xml

Favorable Ratings
Hillary Clinton +3 (49/46)
Walker -7 (23/30)
Paul -13 (29/42)
Rubio -14 (24/38)
Jeb Bush -20 (33/53)
Cruz -20 (25/45)

Approval Ratings
Bill Clinton +50 (73/23)
Obama 0 (47/47)
George W. Bush -4 (47/51)
Democrats in Congress -19 (38/57)
Republicans in Congress -41 (27/68)

Hillary Clinton _____, yes or no?
Strong Leader +32 (64/32)
New Ideas +16 (55/39)
Shares Your Values +1 (48/47)
Trustworthy 0 (46/46)
Understands You -1 (47/48)

Do you want experience or a new direction in the next President?
Experience 55%
A new direction 37

Let me put this through the media/beltway pundit filter...

"HILLARY UNDER 50! She's in hot water...can Dems find an alternative?"
"BREAKING: MASSIVE MAJORITY SAYS HILLARY DOESN'T UNDERSTAND THEM!"
"Will Obama's disastrously low approval rating be a drag on Dems?"
Logged
DemPGH
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,755
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 02, 2015, 04:16:05 PM »

Keep in mind too that she and Bill are not campaigning. She's just taking shots from the far right and from some media outlets. I think she's going to really energize our party.
Logged
Senate Minority Leader Lord Voldemort
Joshua
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,710
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: April 02, 2015, 04:36:24 PM »

Hillary Clinton (D) 58%
Ted Cruz (R) 37%

Logged
Obama-Biden Democrat
Zyzz
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 02, 2015, 04:37:37 PM »

What do you guys think an electoral map would look like with a 14- 20 point Hillary win ?

It would be very interesting to see what happens in AR , KY and WV with a national blowout like that.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,802


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: April 02, 2015, 04:51:53 PM »

Do you want experience or a new direction in the next President?
Experience 55%
A new direction 37

Very good news for Hillary, IMO. We've now had three inexperienced presidents in a row and I think people are starting to see the advantages of a steady hand.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: April 02, 2015, 05:03:07 PM »

What do you guys think an electoral map would look like with a 14- 20 point Hillary win ?

It would be very interesting to see what happens in AR , KY and WV with a national blowout like that.

It would never happen, since even if these numbers held until the election (don't hold your breath), the undecideds would break disproportionately Republican. But if it did, I'm guessing it would be Obama 2008 + AZ/MO/GA + branching into Appalachia.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,357
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: April 02, 2015, 05:09:46 PM »

What do you guys think an electoral map would look like with a 14- 20 point Hillary win ?

It would be very interesting to see what happens in AR , KY and WV with a national blowout like that.

It would never happen, since even if these numbers held until the election (don't hold your breath), the undecideds would break disproportionately Republican. But if it did, I'm guessing it would be Obama 2008 + AZ/MO/GA + branching into Appalachia.

I don't think there would be much electoral college gain. A lot of this PV increase could simply be her losing by smaller margins in Romney states--Gore 2000esque losses--while maintaining Obama's numbers in Dem stats.
Logged
Vega
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,253
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: April 02, 2015, 05:13:23 PM »

Do you want experience or a new direction in the next President?
Experience 55%
A new direction 37

Very good news for Hillary, IMO. We've now had three inexperienced presidents in a row and I think people are starting to see the advantages of a steady hand.

How was Bill Clinton inexperienced?
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: April 02, 2015, 05:14:04 PM »

The only states that a Clinton landslide that Romney won in 2012 are Missouri, Indiana, Georgia, North Carolina, and Arizona. I could possibly see her winning Kentucky, but really, Arkansas and West Virginia are totally lost causes.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,802


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: April 02, 2015, 05:24:26 PM »

Do you want experience or a new direction in the next President?
Experience 55%
A new direction 37

Very good news for Hillary, IMO. We've now had three inexperienced presidents in a row and I think people are starting to see the advantages of a steady hand.

How was Bill Clinton inexperienced?

He was inexperienced in the ways of Washington, which cost him, especially on health care. His predicament was even worse than usual because with Jimmy Carter having been the last Democratic administration, there was no deep well of experienced advisors to draw from either.
Logged
Flake
Flo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: April 02, 2015, 08:21:43 PM »

Do you want experience or a new direction in the next President?
Experience 55%
A new direction 37

Very good news for Hillary, IMO. We've now had three inexperienced presidents in a row and I think people are starting to see the advantages of a steady hand.

How was Bill Clinton inexperienced?

He was inexperienced in the ways of Washington, which cost him, especially on health care. His predicament was even worse than usual because with Jimmy Carter having been the last Democratic administration, there was no deep well of experienced advisors to draw from either.

I can't stress how lucky Clinton is that she has experience with D.C. because her husband was President and she was SOS under the current President. It's really a unique opportunity.
Logged
Oak Hills
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,223
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: April 03, 2015, 11:27:23 AM »

Hillary wins the South by 10 points? She wins 18-39 year olds by 40 points?? She wins Blacks by the same margin as Obama (though that is somewhat plausible)? She wins male voters by 10 points?? Bill Clinton has a 73-23 approval rating?? Clinton leads Rubio and Walker by almost 20 points despite leading them by single digits in almost every other poll? Also, where are the numbers for Hispanic voters?

--> JUNK POLL!

Yeah, the numbers in this poll are wildly implausible.  Sorry, guys.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,841
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: April 03, 2015, 02:05:38 PM »

This is the only election close to a 14% difference between a Republican and a Democrat in a binary election in a century.



The color scheme does not violate the Atlas color convention: this is 1956, and Ike won big (57-42).
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,875


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: April 03, 2015, 06:05:57 PM »

It's beginning to look like a landslide folks.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,841
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: April 03, 2015, 06:44:09 PM »

why ban me?Huh??
 the polls are real and I posting them first

an the april fooler who works today

At least my April Fool polls (as from "Loof-Lipra") and suggestion of the deceased Harold Stassen for President were intended as jokes.

The Star Trek references in one of them (basically Senator KIRK will need phasers to win in a year in which "Hillary Clingon") should have given it away.   
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: April 03, 2015, 06:52:11 PM »

Democrats getting comfortable about Hillary's good polling numbers would create a more likely chance of there being a major mess up that could cost her the race.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: April 03, 2015, 07:02:34 PM »

It's beginning to look like a landslide folks.

Will you now accept your accolades?
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.046 seconds with 13 queries.