Would the ERA have had an even tougher time today than it did in the 1970s?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 10:10:47 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Would the ERA have had an even tougher time today than it did in the 1970s?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: Yes or no
#1
Yes, it wouldn't have even been sent to the states
 
#2
Yes, it would have been ratified by fewer states
 
#3
No, it would've gotten closer to ratification but still fallen short
 
#4
No, it would've passed
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 39

Author Topic: Would the ERA have had an even tougher time today than it did in the 1970s?  (Read 2370 times)
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: May 31, 2015, 06:51:17 AM »

The ERA is much like the proposed Child Labor Amendment.  In theory, it would desirable, but in practice I fail to see where it is needed.  What exactly would passage of an ERA do that isn't already being done (or least is doable by Congress if it chooses to act)?  I can't think of anything.

Sex/gender discrimination is held to a lower standard of scrutiny than racial/ethnic discrimination, and the ERA would fix that.
And what specifically would that technical change in the standard of scrutiny applied actually affect? I can't think of any situation in which a law passed today that addressed racial discrimination would not also address gender discrimination.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.206 seconds with 14 queries.