NH-PPP: Clinton leading by a lot
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 06:54:45 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  NH-PPP: Clinton leading by a lot
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: NH-PPP: Clinton leading by a lot  (Read 5455 times)
Skye
yeah_93
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,580
Venezuela


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: April 21, 2015, 06:00:13 PM »

It baffles me that you are trying to come up with results when the candidates haven't even been decided, and the national campaigns have not started yet.
Logged
Former Democrat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 250
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: April 21, 2015, 06:30:45 PM »

FL would be republican with Rubio
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: April 21, 2015, 06:38:15 PM »


Based off what? A single Mason Dixon poll? Their track record is awful.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,858
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: April 21, 2015, 11:00:00 PM »

PPP polls Iowa this weekend.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: April 22, 2015, 02:05:25 AM »


No, it does not.

NH is ca. D+2

Like all other recent state polls, this poll here indicates a national lead for Hillary of ca. 7-11 points, depending on which top candidate you are using.

The CNN poll had twice these margins, which makes it junky.
Logged
YaBoyNY
NYMillennial
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,469
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: April 22, 2015, 05:29:09 AM »

The clintons are not very popular in IA and CO neither
of course if Cruz or Carson or Huckabee is the nominee she would win them but with Bush Chrsitie Paul Fiorina or Rubio she`ll lose them

I'm really not sure where you're getting this idea from.

Are we just discounting the polls we want to discount because reasons?
Logged
Devils30
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,987
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: April 22, 2015, 01:54:11 PM »

Romney and McCain were both very good fits for NH. Both lost the state by more than their national number. It doesn't make sense for the GOP to run expensive ads in the Boston media market and I see NH-1 flipping back to the Democrats.
Logged
DS0816
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,137
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: April 22, 2015, 06:00:28 PM »

In the past: Every time a Republican won the presidency…New Hampshire carried.

In the present (and future)Sad Every time a Democrat has won the presidency…New Hampshire carried/carries.

If the Democrats win a third consecutive presidential election with 2016…New Hampshire will carry.

Logged
DS0816
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,137
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: April 22, 2015, 06:30:21 PM »

In the past: Every time a Republican won the presidency…New Hampshire carried.

Bush won without NH in 2004. I don't think NH is a pivotal state for the GOP.

I know.

I was going to add the state-breaks in patterns, for winning Republicans and winning Democrats, going back to a 1968 Richard Nixon but I figured … the hell with all that.

Certainly, you understand this!
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: April 22, 2015, 06:38:25 PM »

In the past: Every time a Republican won the presidency…New Hampshire carried.

Bush won without NH in 2004. I don't think NH is a pivotal state for the GOP.

If Clinton carries VA and NH how does GOP get to 270? (Assuming they pick up FL, OH, CO,  and IA)

You are left with....
 WI (unlikely w/o Walker and still difficult with him),
NV? (Looks more and more like NM which the GOP gave up on in 2012)
PA? (Much bigger and more expensive than NH and Hillary is better fit than Obama)

after that you get into fantasy land of turning MI, MN, OR, or NM into a tipping point. 
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 14 queries.