Sudan becoming "US ally" on war on terror (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 06:45:16 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Sudan becoming "US ally" on war on terror (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Sudan becoming "US ally" on war on terror  (Read 3681 times)
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,914


« on: May 01, 2005, 06:22:44 PM »

This is a quick reversal
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,914


« Reply #1 on: May 02, 2005, 06:27:59 PM »

We can choke off the entire eastern hemisphere from Middle East oil by blockading the straits of Hormuz and using our bases in Afghanistan, Uzbekistan and Krygizstan to prevent oil from moving across Central Asia by land. As for Venezuelan and North Sea oil, we could blockade the straits of Malacca and the Panama canal, hence cutting off Venezuela's supply to any Asian nation. That leaves only Russia, but Russia doesn't have enough oil to feed what China's energy demands would be anyway. These are the benefits of sea power Smiley
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,914


« Reply #2 on: May 03, 2005, 07:18:39 PM »

We can choke off the entire eastern hemisphere from Middle East oil by blockading the straits of Hormuz and using our bases in Afghanistan, Uzbekistan and Krygizstan to prevent oil from moving across Central Asia by land. As for Venezuelan and North Sea oil, we could blockade the straits of Malacca and the Panama canal, hence cutting off Venezuela's supply to any Asian nation. That leaves only Russia, but Russia doesn't have enough oil to feed what China's energy demands would be anyway. These are the benefits of sea power Smiley

The only time these things would happen would be if we were at war with China.  I doubt China will continue trading with the United States if we're attempting to starve her economy.  The US economy would collapse, something we could have achived by a direct embargo rather than indirect blockades of sattelite nations.

I'm just saying it would be easier at certain chokepoints than trying to cover a 1000-mile coastline, even with satellite technology.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.