|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChrisDR68
PoshPaws68
Jr. Member
Posts: 395
|
|
« Reply #17 on: May 08, 2015, 08:18:07 AM » |
|
I think I would have felt less depressed, in a weird way, after the 79, 83, 87 and 92 results than I do now.
History repeating itself yet again. The polls were wrong and the Shy Tory Voter phenomenon is very much alive and well. The Tory vote underestimated for the 6th general election in a row. It feels quite like 1992 again except for what happened in Scotland and the brutal crushing of the Lib Dems.
|
|
|
|
ChrisDR68
PoshPaws68
Jr. Member
Posts: 395
|
|
« Reply #18 on: May 08, 2015, 09:06:06 AM » |
|
Is this the most dissapointing/crushing election night in the history of the Labour Party?
Can't be far from it. Of course, 1970 and 1992 are also good candidates (strange how often the pollsters strongly overestimate Labour's chances). 1983 was terrible of course, but so expected that it can't have felt anywhere near this bad.
No, 1992 (in my memory at least). Really this election result was very predictable, we just allowed ourselves to be kidded by the polls that perhaps Miliband and Balls weren't as unpopular as we all knew they really were, and that losing Scotland didn't matter because the SNP are left-wing anyway. All a big house of cards and the cold light of day reveals these beliefs to be the fallacy we secretly knew all along. But a new leader, a miserable Tory government run by the 60 or so far right in their ranks, and a big win in 5 years beckons
I think it will be incredibly difficult for Labour to win remembering their wipeout in Scotland. Not impossible but incredibly difficult. It's doubtful that any of the possible new Labour leaders will have anything like the broad appeal that Tony Blair had. He was very, very unusual in that regard.
|
|
|
|
ChrisDR68
PoshPaws68
Jr. Member
Posts: 395
|
|
« Reply #19 on: May 08, 2015, 11:05:04 AM » |
|
Popular vote totals:
Conservative......... 11,334,920 (36.9%) Labour..................... 9,344,328 (30.4%) UKIP........................ 3,881,129 (12.6%) Liberal Democrats.... 2,415,888 (7.9%) SNP.......................... 1,454,436 (4.7%) Greens..................... 1,154,562 (3.8%) Others..................... 1,106,417 (3.7%) -------------------------------------------------- Totals.................... 30,691,680 (100.0%)
Change from 2010:
Conservative.............. +631,266 Labour........................ +737,811 UKIP........................ +2,961,658 Liberal Democrats.... -4,420,360 SNP............................ +963,050 Greens....................... +889,319 Others........................ +758,668
|
|
|
|
ChrisDR68
PoshPaws68
Jr. Member
Posts: 395
|
|
« Reply #20 on: May 08, 2015, 12:39:07 PM » |
|
Most the voters that gave the Lib Dems 63 and 57 seats respectively in 2005 and 2010 were Labour supporters protesting Blair and the Iraq War and fashioned the Libs as a viable center-left alternative. They were certainly not happy to have in effect voted to put up a Conservative government.
If that was true the Labour popular vote would be something like 3 million up on 2010 and they would have won this election in a landslide. Most lost Lib Dem voters seem instead to have gone to UKIP which would indicate they are general protest voters and not Labour voters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChrisDR68
PoshPaws68
Jr. Member
Posts: 395
|
|
« Reply #24 on: May 09, 2015, 08:31:15 AM » |
|
The results was largely a wash from 2010 except the Lib Dems collapsed and the Tories benefited the most, hence their narrow majority. Labour lost seats because they lost more seats to the SNP than they gained from the Lib Dems. The funny thing about this general election is that the Conservative and Labour popular vote barely changed. The reason why the Tories failed to win a majority in 2010 was because of the large number of Liberal Democrat seats. If the Lib Dems had had a similar number of seats in 1992 John Major would have failed to win a majority in that election too. My feeling is that a majority of the protest vote that the Lib Dems hoovered up in 2005 and 2010 switched en masse to UKIP (and to a lesser degree to the SNP and Greens). That meant the Tory vote which stayed steady was enough to take all those Lib Dem seats in the south. The fortunes of the Lib Dems is largely dependent on the gap between themselves and the Conservatives: 1992 - a gap of 24% - Lib Dems win 20 seats 2005 - a gap of 10% - Lib Dems win 62 seats 2010 - a gap of 13% - Lib Dems win 57 seats 2015 - a gap of 28% - Lib Dems win 8 seats The difficulty for the Lib Dems is that they are competing with the SNP, UKIP and the Greens for largely the same protest votes. In 2005 these parties polled in insignificant numbers. In 2015 this changed radically meaning the road back to recovery for them will be very long, very hard and very slow.
|
|
|
|