Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 20, 2019, 04:01:37 am
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

  Atlas Forum
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  NOTE: How to enter 2016 polls to the database (at the moment)
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Author Topic: NOTE: How to enter 2016 polls to the database (at the moment)  (Read 16155 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 50,712
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 11, 2015, 10:55:55 am »

As long as the GOP field is fluid:

Tender: Perhaps you should sticky a thread on the polling board, giving instructions about entering polls?  Otherwise, no one is going to remember the thing about averaging Bush/Rubio/Walker.

Also:

If someone wants to enter a new (or old) poll into the database, please do it the way DAVE did and average the GOP numbers from Bush/Walker/Rubio and use the average of Hillary against these 3 Republicans.

If a poll only shows Hillary vs. one or two top-Republicans, then just average these and enter it to the database.

I think averaging the top-3 GOPers is the best right now to show how the GOP matches against Hillary ...

Thx.
Logged
Landslide Andy
IceSpear
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31,731
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 11, 2015, 01:32:36 pm »

Will this formula stay the same even if one or more of those candidates implode?
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 50,712
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 12, 2015, 01:46:02 am »

Will this formula stay the same even if one or more of those candidates implode?

No, in this case we use the new TOP-3 on the RCP average:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_republican_presidential_nomination-3823.html
Logged
Dave Leip
leip
Administrator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,361
United States


P P P
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 12, 2015, 11:46:12 am »

Hi -
Is there a desire for individual polling databases in addition to the generic - i.e. Clinton-Walker, Clinton-Bush, etc.?  This is of course a lot more data entry…

Thanks,
Dave
Logged
King
intermoderate
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29,445
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 12, 2015, 11:49:03 am »

Hi -
Is there a desire for individual polling databases in addition to the generic - i.e. Clinton-Walker, Clinton-Bush, etc.?  This is of course a lot more data entry…

Thanks,
Dave

I think we should hold off until the GOP contenders becomes clearer (December?). It'd be a waste to do all that work on a Clinton-Walker map and then Walker completely busts and drops out in November, for example.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 50,712
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 12, 2015, 12:46:11 pm »

Hi -
Is there a desire for individual polling databases in addition to the generic - i.e. Clinton-Walker, Clinton-Bush, etc.?  This is of course a lot more data entry…

Thanks,
Dave

Nah, that would be too much.

Besides, pbrower already does that (even though he likes to exclude polls that show Republicans ahead):

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=169131.msg4597502#msg4597502

Maybe you can write him a PM and tell him to include every poll.
Logged
pbrower2a
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21,452
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 12, 2015, 01:14:16 pm »

I suggest that favorite sons (Snyder in Michigan, Kasich in Ohio, Santorum in Pennsylvania, Palin in Alaska) be recognized separately from the others if they are not understood to be national contenders.   
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 50,712
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 13, 2015, 09:05:23 am »

Since when do 2012 election results count as polls?

It's just to fill the unpolled states on the map.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 50,712
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 09, 2015, 12:09:59 am »


This ranking has now changed, btw.

The TOP-3 are now:

Bush
Walker
Carson

(but I guess it will soon be Bush, Walker, Trump ...)
Logged
Mr. Morden
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 40,227
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 09, 2015, 12:39:44 am »

If Dave is serious about this "top 3 from RCP" thing (is he? or was that a Tender proposal that Dave just ran with), then he should probably say that that's what we're doing on the main polling page.  I mean, this thread is all well and good for those of us on the forum, but the audience for Dave's site extends beyond this forum.  If I went here:

https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/PRESIDENT/2016/polls.php

and had never been to this forum before, I wouldn't really know what the data on the map is supposed to represent.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 50,712
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 09, 2015, 12:42:00 am »

If Dave is serious about this "top 3 from RCP" thing (is he? or was that a Tender proposal that Dave just ran with), then he should probably say that that's what we're doing on the main polling page.  I mean, this thread is all well and good for those of us on the forum, but the audience for Dave's site extends beyond this forum.  If I went here:

https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/PRESIDENT/2016/polls.php

and had never been to this forum before, I wouldn't really know what the data on the map is supposed to represent.


It's the other way round: Dave set up the 2016 database and entered a poll with the top-3 at that time and I just went with it and posted the criteria here.
Logged
Mr. Morden
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 40,227
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 09, 2015, 12:49:52 am »

If Dave is serious about this "top 3 from RCP" thing (is he? or was that a Tender proposal that Dave just ran with), then he should probably say that that's what we're doing on the main polling page.  I mean, this thread is all well and good for those of us on the forum, but the audience for Dave's site extends beyond this forum.  If I went here:

https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/PRESIDENT/2016/polls.php

and had never been to this forum before, I wouldn't really know what the data on the map is supposed to represent.


It's the other way round: Dave set up the 2016 database and entered a poll with the top-3 at that time and I just went with it and posted the criteria here.

OK.  Well, my underlying point stands.  In the unlikely event that Dave is reading this, my recommendation to him would be for him to explain his methodology on that polling page.  Because as it is now, it wouldn't really make sense to someone who hasn't read this thread.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 50,712
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 13, 2015, 12:55:55 pm »

If Dave is serious about this "top 3 from RCP" thing (is he? or was that a Tender proposal that Dave just ran with), then he should probably say that that's what we're doing on the main polling page.  I mean, this thread is all well and good for those of us on the forum, but the audience for Dave's site extends beyond this forum.  If I went here:

https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/PRESIDENT/2016/polls.php

and had never been to this forum before, I wouldn't really know what the data on the map is supposed to represent.


It's the other way round: Dave set up the 2016 database and entered a poll with the top-3 at that time and I just went with it and posted the criteria here.

OK.  Well, my underlying point stands.  In the unlikely event that Dave is reading this, my recommendation to him would be for him to explain his methodology on that polling page.  Because as it is now, it wouldn't really make sense to someone who hasn't read this thread.

I agree that Dave should probably post here at some point and explain what he prefers.

Anyway, the new TOP-3 according to RCP are now Bush, Trump and Walker.

This is what we will use in the database for the next polls.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 50,712
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 20, 2015, 02:50:04 pm »

According to RCP, the top-3 are now Trump/Bush/Carson. Shall we include those now?

As I am THE moderator and my word is the gold standard: Yes.

(If Carson is not polled, use the one polled who's next on the RCP average)
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 50,712
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: August 20, 2015, 02:55:14 pm »

According to RCP, the top-3 are now Trump/Bush/Carson. Shall we include those now?

As I am THE moderator and my word is the gold standard: Yes.

(If Carson is not polled, use the one polled who's next on the RCP average)

Okay thx. So always include Clinton vs. the TOP 3 in the RCP average?

At this point it is the best option I guess.

If we average all Republicans polled against Hillary, it could inflate her margin - simply because some Republicans have a low name recognition right now and trail by bigger margins than well-known GOPers.

For example it makes no sense to average a poll that includes Lindsey Graham and where he's down 20 points to Hillary.
Logged
Dave Leip
leip
Administrator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,361
United States


P P P
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: March 18, 2016, 09:55:23 am »
« Edited: March 29, 2016, 05:19:19 pm by Dave Leip »

Hi,
At this point, all polls should be Clinton-Trump until/unless something changes.

Thanks,
Dave

"typo" removed "not" Smiley
Logged
Sorenroy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1,367
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -3.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: March 21, 2016, 06:34:05 am »

At this point, all polls should not be Clinton-Trump until/unless something changes.

So, to those posting polls, doesn't the "should not be" mean it should still be the average of the top three candidates?
Logged
Dave Leip
leip
Administrator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,361
United States


P P P
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: March 29, 2016, 05:19:46 pm »

At this point, all polls should not be Clinton-Trump until/unless something changes.

So, to those posting polls, doesn't the "should not be" mean it should still be the average of the top three candidates?

Bad typo there.  I meant to say that we should be Trump-Clinton.
Thanks,
Dave
Logged
Skye
yeah_93
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,384
Venezuela


Political Matrix
E: 3.29, S: -1.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: March 29, 2016, 06:40:09 pm »

Hi,
At this point, all polls should be Clinton-Trump until/unless something changes.

Thanks,
Dave

"typo" removed "not" Smiley
I agree with this.
Logged
pbrower2a
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21,452
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: April 15, 2016, 12:15:00 pm »

I'm still showing maps of matchups -- and I add (I doubt that I will add anyone anymore) possible nominees as they appear relevant or drop them as they become irrelevant (as they drop out or get defeated, as most recently Marco Rubio did). 

 
Logged
cloudmage
Newbie
*
Posts: 1
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: May 08, 2016, 04:48:02 pm »
« Edited: May 08, 2016, 04:49:47 pm by cloudmage »

I created a chart on statpedia to show the results of all the General Election Polls over the last three months with the data taken from RealClear Politics. It shows up when you search for "poll".
Logged
/
darthebearnc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7,378
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: June 24, 2016, 06:57:40 pm »

Wouldn't it be interesting to have some sort of national poll tracker as well?

I know there are a lot out there already, but everything's better with AtlasTM.
Logged
Ebsy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7,820
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: June 24, 2016, 07:01:01 pm »

idk, I think there are enough national polling averages (RCP, NYT, 538, Huffpollster) that there isn't really a need for another one.
Logged
tmthforu94
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21,078
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.94, S: 1.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: July 22, 2016, 12:56:13 pm »

I see we're going with the 4-way Suffolk poll in Ohio (which favors Clinton) and the 2-way WMUR poll in New Hampshire (which also coincidently favors Clinton). We need some consistency when entering polls. Either we just enter 2-way numbers or just enter 3/4-way numbers.
Logged
mds32
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1,083
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: July 22, 2016, 01:15:12 pm »

I see we're going with the 4-way Suffolk poll in Ohio (which favors Clinton) and the 2-way WMUR poll in New Hampshire (which also coincidently favors Clinton). We need some consistency when entering polls. Either we just enter 2-way numbers or just enter 3/4-way numbers.

I agree. Especially after it was already put in as a TIE. I am calling you out  benconstine (D-VA).
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length
Logout

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC