'00-'12 County Trend Map (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 08:50:43 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  '00-'12 County Trend Map (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: '00-'12 County Trend Map  (Read 8751 times)
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,677
« on: June 05, 2015, 07:53:56 PM »

Wow.  So it's basically Appalachia, the majority white parts of the South, and weirdly, the outer suburbs of the Northeast going massively R while majority-minority areas go massively D and the rest of the country goes mildly D in almost uniform fashion.  Fascinating.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,677
« Reply #1 on: June 05, 2015, 09:15:20 PM »

^ Yep, here's the state version of this map:



With the exception of the western AZ/UT/WY cluster, all the Republican states are contiguous and sprawl out from Appalachia.

Looks like Romney really did help in the NE suburbs and Florida, but it just wasn't enough.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,677
« Reply #2 on: June 05, 2015, 11:42:12 PM »

AZ sort of baffled me. This map skips over 2008, so its not like it was home state effected by McCain or anything.

That surprised me, too. FL is also baffling.

Romney NE suburban strength, but only relative to long term decline in Republican vote in the region.  It carried over to Florida retirees even more so, but was somewhat offset by Hispanic growth.

Note that this strongly suggests Republican problems in CO, NH and about half of VA are actually understated by 2008 and 2012 due to Romney and McCain being non-Southern suburbanites.  Conversely, Republicans should be pretty enthused about Ohio going the way of Missouri the next time they nominate a populist.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,677
« Reply #3 on: June 06, 2015, 12:01:32 AM »

And holy hell, Tennessee! A sea of blue!

Gore exaggerated the trend somewhat, but the '04-'12 version of this map was pretty severe as well.

You can pretty much see the outline of the old TN-04 with those dark navy counties.

04-12 seems to confirm a Romney suburban bounce in parts of the NE.  Of course it's overshadowed in NYC by 9/11 being compared against Sandy.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,677
« Reply #4 on: June 06, 2015, 03:14:47 AM »

Sort of expected. Romney played better than the typical Republican in NE suburbs and even the cities themselves.

It's easier for Northeasterners to get behind someone who's perceived as a fiscal conservative and (perceptively speaking) a social moderate than for a typical Republican candidate.

I'd like to see what Hillary vs. pre-Akin/Duggar Huckabee would look like.  Probably insane polarization like this?




Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,677
« Reply #5 on: June 06, 2015, 05:15:44 PM »

What's going on in Idaho and Montana?

Lol @ the ability to count on one hand how many counties are trending Republican in California.

Gore made gun control a central part of his campaign.  Obama didn't touch it until 2013.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.