Ohio: Mixed results for Hillary Clinton in match-ups against Republicans, PPP (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 08:39:52 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Ohio: Mixed results for Hillary Clinton in match-ups against Republicans, PPP (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Ohio: Mixed results for Hillary Clinton in match-ups against Republicans, PPP  (Read 6107 times)
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,678
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17
« on: June 10, 2015, 01:10:35 PM »
Mixed results, Kasich seems to be favoured in Ohio. But, winning Colorado is part of the overall strategy, as well.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,678
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17
« Reply #1 on: June 10, 2015, 03:06:22 PM »
Quote from: Ebsy on June 10, 2015, 02:20:07 PM
Not good numbers for Hillary at all. Abysmal numbers for any other Democrat though, so not really a sound argument against nominating her. And, PPP favorability numbers are always junk.

OMalley doesnt have that 3rd constituency, in itself to win COLO, the Latino vote, Dems alternate path to presidency, along with NM and NV.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,678
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17
« Reply #2 on: June 10, 2015, 05:25:11 PM »
Clinton can certainly win CO, NV, NM and Pa; without Ohio.

Clinton will have to work for it.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,678
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17
« Reply #3 on: June 11, 2015, 12:06:25 PM »
Quote from: xingkerui on June 11, 2015, 10:44:57 AM
Definitely a bad poll for Clinton, but this is far from spelling doom for her.

She's been ahead a long time in Ohio. Ted Strickland is tied with Portman. Kaine is most likely the VP.

She will run slightly ahead all the GOP in Ohio.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,678
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17
« Reply #4 on: June 11, 2015, 05:38:19 PM »
The Dems need Kaine in order to have any chance of getting Strickland and Clinton elected.

Hope he is selected. Dems arent gonna necessarily win majority of house, but make enroads in it. So 2010 wont matter as much. Endorse Kaine.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,678
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17
« Reply #5 on: June 11, 2015, 06:24:55 PM »
« Edited: June 11, 2015, 06:28:09 PM by OC »
No, Bill Clinton after the election was critical of how he ran his campaign.

It may be Tom Perez, he wont cause stir, due to his newness, like Castro does.

But, finalist as inside blogs put it along with Tom Perez, Julian Castro and Mark Warner will be the Veep pick.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,678
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17
« Reply #6 on: June 11, 2015, 07:03:02 PM »
I think it is down to Warner or Castro, who can attrackY2K voters.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,678
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17
« Reply #7 on: June 13, 2015, 10:56:26 PM »
Ohio or CO are the swing of this election.

OMalley has to concerned with these poll numbers. Especially, since polls has indicated Clinton is weak in Co, then if he is this far down in Ohio, her best state, he cant win CO, either.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 13 queries.