Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 21, 2019, 01:24:23 am
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

  Atlas Forum
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderators: Socialist Mod Stands with ProudWhatsHisName, Apocrypha)
  Post random maps here
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 58 59 60 61 62 [63] 64 65 66 67 68 ... 239 Print
Author Topic: Post random maps here  (Read 835226 times)
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30,364
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1550 on: June 22, 2008, 01:16:54 pm »


Benconstine's wet dream?

No Tongue
Logged
auburntiger
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1,233
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.61, S: 0.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1551 on: June 22, 2008, 02:33:28 pm »



Ignore the fact it's all blue. Focus on the shades. DC doesn't count either.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 39,127
Bangladesh


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1552 on: June 22, 2008, 03:29:01 pm »


Benconstine's wet dream?

1932, 10% swing. Too easy.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30,364
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1553 on: June 22, 2008, 04:10:58 pm »


Benconstine's wet dream?

1932, 10% swing. Too easy.

That's how it looks, but not what I had in mind.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 39,127
Bangladesh


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1554 on: June 22, 2008, 04:15:02 pm »


Benconstine's wet dream?

1932, 10% swing. Too easy.

That's how it looks, but not what I had in mind.

%D, then.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30,364
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1555 on: June 22, 2008, 04:16:24 pm »


Benconstine's wet dream?

1932, 10% swing. Too easy.

That's how it looks, but not what I had in mind.

%D, then.

I was thinking a UNS to the Democrats, from 1928-1932.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 39,127
Bangladesh


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1556 on: June 22, 2008, 04:17:55 pm »

5%?
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30,364
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1557 on: June 22, 2008, 04:18:44 pm »

5%?

No, much larger.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 39,127
Bangladesh


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1558 on: June 22, 2008, 04:22:28 pm »

15.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30,364
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1559 on: June 22, 2008, 04:23:00 pm »

15.

Nope.
Logged
War on Want
Evilmexicandictator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7,648
Uzbekistan


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -8.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1560 on: June 22, 2008, 04:24:07 pm »

10%
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30,364
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1561 on: June 22, 2008, 08:22:05 pm »

10%

Yup.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 39,127
Bangladesh


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1562 on: June 22, 2008, 09:29:06 pm »

10%

Yup.

That's what I said.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31,876
Cuba


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1563 on: June 23, 2008, 02:25:31 pm »


Benconstine's wet dream?

1932, 10% swing. Too easy.

10%

Yup.


lolz
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30,364
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1564 on: June 23, 2008, 02:35:43 pm »

10%

Yup.

That's what I said.

Sorry Tongue
Logged
Smid
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6,155
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1565 on: June 24, 2008, 10:47:09 pm »



Ignore the fact it's all blue. Focus on the shades. DC doesn't count either.

Percent of times they've voted for the winning presidential candidate?
Logged
Bacon King
Atlas Politician
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1566 on: June 25, 2008, 12:57:37 am »

Logged
Erc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5,741
Slovenia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1567 on: June 25, 2008, 11:36:40 am »
« Edited: June 25, 2008, 11:38:25 am by Erc »



On the same theme as my last two maps (link)
Logged
auburntiger
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1,233
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.61, S: 0.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1568 on: June 26, 2008, 03:59:09 pm »



Ignore the fact it's all blue. Focus on the shades. DC doesn't count either.

Percent of times they've voted for the winning presidential candidate?

YEP, from 1960-present.
>30%= worst record for choosing the winner
>90% = best record
Logged
auburntiger
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1,233
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.61, S: 0.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1569 on: June 26, 2008, 04:00:22 pm »



red states = states that trended Dem from 2000-2004
blue states = states that trended GOP from 2000-2004
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 39,127
Bangladesh


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1570 on: June 26, 2008, 04:09:40 pm »



red states = states that trended Dem from 2000-2004
blue states = states that trended GOP from 2000-2004

Can't be. See Iowa and New Mexico.
Logged
War on Want
Evilmexicandictator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7,648
Uzbekistan


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -8.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1571 on: June 26, 2008, 04:11:04 pm »



red states = states that trended Dem from 2000-2004
blue states = states that trended GOP from 2000-2004

Can't be. See Iowa and New Mexico.
Nope they trended towards the Democrats.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31,876
Cuba


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1572 on: June 26, 2008, 04:17:51 pm »



red states = states that trended Dem from 2000-2004
blue states = states that trended GOP from 2000-2004

Can't be. See Iowa and New Mexico.
Nope they trended towards the Democrats.

This is the shaded map:



Trend defined here as "D-R Margin Change from Previous Election Relative to National Change".
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 39,127
Bangladesh


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1573 on: June 26, 2008, 04:47:35 pm »

I'm stupid, huh?
Logged
Erc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5,741
Slovenia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1574 on: June 26, 2008, 10:54:31 pm »

I'm stupid, huh?

New Mexico and Iowa both went from being Gore states to being Bush states, but solely due to the fact that Bush did better nationally...compared to the national average, they were better for the Democrats than in 2004.  [Gore performed worse than his national average in both states [well, certainly in New Mexico], but Kerry performed better...as Kerry performed worse overall, he still managed to lose both states].
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 58 59 60 61 62 [63] 64 65 66 67 68 ... 239 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length
Logout

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC