Post random maps here
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 12:27:06 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Post random maps here
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 67 68 69 70 71 [72] 73 74 75 76 77 ... 238
Author Topic: Post random maps here  (Read 979605 times)
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1775 on: November 30, 2008, 12:30:51 AM »

Logged
Smid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,151
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1776 on: November 30, 2008, 09:25:30 AM »


Well... it's 1892, but I notice that some of the states have flipped to Weaver, however I also notice that North Dakota flipped from Weaver to the Dems... Louisiana flipped to the Republicans. I thought briefly that it might have been a "who came second" type of map, but California, Washington, Oregan, Nevada, Idaho didn't flip (nor did plenty of others, they're just the ones I care to mention). I'm a little unsure. I will certainly give this some thought.
Logged
Workers' Friend
Bob Dole
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,294
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: 9.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1777 on: November 30, 2008, 07:53:55 PM »



1996 with giving Dole all of Perot's and Nader's votes.
Logged
SilverPhantom2
Rookie
**
Posts: 21
Spain


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1778 on: December 01, 2008, 12:31:11 AM »

Test maps for my Timeline...

1840, Incumbent Whig William H. Harrison is renominated against Democrat Martin Van Buren.



1844, The Republican Coalition nominates Daniel Webster. The Democratic Coalition nominates Lewis Cass.



1848, Webster chooses not to run again. The Republican Coalition nominates Zachary Taylor. The Democratics nominate James Buchanan. The whole election hinges on CT... Buchanan wins by one.





Logged
SilverPhantom2
Rookie
**
Posts: 21
Spain


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1779 on: December 01, 2008, 12:38:23 AM »

And this is just because...

2008, GOP nominees are Romney/Brownback, Dem is Obama/Biden. Economic crisis and Romney has a solid defense...



GOP: 299
Dem: 239
Logged
This Guy
Newbie
*
Posts: 6
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1780 on: December 01, 2008, 07:19:28 PM »

Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1781 on: December 01, 2008, 10:18:55 PM »

And this is just because...

2008, GOP nominees are Romney/Brownback, Dem is Obama/Biden. Economic crisis and Romney has a solid defense...



GOP: 299
Dem: 239

Massachusetts? Please.
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1782 on: December 01, 2008, 11:00:33 PM »

Dukakis defeats Bush 280-258 (7.9% swing to Dukakis)

Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1783 on: December 01, 2008, 11:05:51 PM »

McCain defeats Obama 276-262 (9.54% swing to McCain)

Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1784 on: December 01, 2008, 11:17:30 PM »

Dole defeats Clinton 282-256 (9.2% swing to Dole)

Logged
SilverPhantom2
Rookie
**
Posts: 21
Spain


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1785 on: December 01, 2008, 11:45:41 PM »
« Edited: December 01, 2008, 11:47:33 PM by SilverPhantom2 »



The South, though firey and led by the warmongering South Carolina, still casts their vote for the compromise Party: John Bell. In the north, similar leanings towards compromise instead of a complete ban on slavery leads to the election of Stephen Douglas.

The Republican Party takes only New England and the Southern Democrats pull only the Deep South. My guess is that this would spell doom for the Southern Democrats, but the Republican Party might become some very small third party. The Constitutional Party and the Democrats might be the parties lasting into the 20th Century... assuming a compromise on slavery is reached.

Douglas (D) - 156
Bell (C) - 77
Lincoln (R) - 36
Breckenridge (S) - 34
Logged
SilverPhantom2
Rookie
**
Posts: 21
Spain


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1786 on: December 01, 2008, 11:51:51 PM »



Democratic Party compromises in 1860 with a Douglas/Breckenridge ticket (no split over Kansas in 1854). The south obviously goes Democratic. Douglas has an uphill battle, fighting for the northern states... but wins a decisive majority.

Douglas (D) - 159
Lincoln (R) - 144
Logged
Robespierre's Jaw
Senator Conor Flynn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,129
Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -8.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1787 on: December 02, 2008, 12:18:48 AM »

1992: Bush/Quayle defeats Clinton/Gore, due to receiving every Perot supporters vote.

Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1788 on: December 02, 2008, 01:19:24 AM »

Carter beats Reagan 283-255 (7.93% swing to Carter)

Logged
MK
Mike Keller
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,432
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1789 on: December 02, 2008, 09:23:56 AM »







1972 McGovern never has the mess with Eagalton and the AAA lable is never leaked out. He still loses pretty badly though. 
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1790 on: December 02, 2008, 10:44:47 AM »



Quit it.
Logged
SilverPhantom2
Rookie
**
Posts: 21
Spain


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1791 on: December 02, 2008, 03:30:01 PM »

Why? Historically, South Carolina was secessionist.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1792 on: December 02, 2008, 08:26:23 PM »

Why? Historically, South Carolina was secessionist.

So? Secessionist doesn't equal warmongering.
Logged
MK
Mike Keller
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,432
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1793 on: December 03, 2008, 10:04:57 AM »





1972- Nixon/ Agnew vs Muskie/ Reubi Askew
Logged
SilverPhantom2
Rookie
**
Posts: 21
Spain


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1794 on: December 03, 2008, 10:07:43 AM »

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I believe the proper expression is, "Them's fightin' words."
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1795 on: December 03, 2008, 01:44:14 PM »

Yep, and if more states held that sort of stance our Federal government wouldn't be out of control like it currently is.
Logged
RosettaStoned
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,154
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.45, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1796 on: December 03, 2008, 02:54:19 PM »

Logged
SilverPhantom2
Rookie
**
Posts: 21
Spain


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1797 on: December 03, 2008, 06:00:44 PM »

Yep, and if more states held that sort of stance our Federal government wouldn't be out of control like it currently is.

I'm an anarcho-capitalist, so you don't have to lecture me about the overbearing power of the federal government. Still, I'm also a realist, and the historical reality of 1860 South Carolina was that Abraham Lincoln wasn't even on the ballot, despite the fact that Stephen Douglas was absolutely right, winning only the northern states, the north politically dominated the government. Could a compromise be reached? I'm an absolute believer that it could've. Unfortunately, South Carolina didn't believe so and they followed the famous words uttered by Calhoun and Hayne. Whether or not you agree with them, it's warmongering. Plain and simple.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

1972 Demo-wank? XP

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Tilden v. Hayes comes out with a Dem victory? Does this involve anything with LA, FL, and SC having Conservative gov'ts and voting their conscience instead of with Rep. troops? Or something just entirely different?
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1798 on: December 08, 2008, 03:39:26 PM »



Hint: 2008 is involved
Logged
Robespierre's Jaw
Senator Conor Flynn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,129
Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -8.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1799 on: December 09, 2008, 06:22:29 PM »





1972- Nixon/ Agnew vs Muskie/ Reubi Askew

Hilarious.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 67 68 69 70 71 [72] 73 74 75 76 77 ... 238  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.065 seconds with 11 queries.