Cohabitation ban (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 08:18:19 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Cohabitation ban (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Do you support North Carolinan's cohabitation ban?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
#3
Hell no
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 30

Author Topic: Cohabitation ban  (Read 1777 times)
muon2
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,802


« on: May 09, 2005, 09:32:24 PM »

This could provide an interesting test if it makes its way to the SCOTUS. The court has relied on its twin pillars of Belle Terre (1974) and East Cleveland (1977) to define the outer boundaries of relationships in a household that government may permit by zoning. In Oxford House (1995) they nibbled at the ultimate question of whether any family relations may be used in conjunction with the Fair Housing Act, but refused to take it on directly.

The definitions under the FHA are critical to municipal understanding of what zoning rules may pertain to household composition. Even though this is not a zoning law, I'm sure it will have ramifications if it goes far.

In our city we avoid the question of relationships in households entirely. We strictly use floor area and room configurations to determine who (and how many) may occupy a structure.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 14 queries.