I apologize. No, seriously. I forgot that you're just editing the original post every time from now on. Sorry.
But still, this is a common WV pollster with a decent track record.
I was going to wait until Wednesday to show any new polls. But I could edit the Clinton-Trump map to remove the numbers of electoral votes and add in a shade for West Virginia to prove someone wrong about my bias.
It might be tempting when a state not recently polled appears. I would do that for Georgia.
This is off-topic, but you can't be surprised that people call you a hack when you're convinced that Roy Blunt is toast in 2016 but Michael Bennet is going to win easily because it's a presidential year, even though his approval ratings are about the same as Blunt's.
Roy Blunt looks like toast with an approval rating in the 30s even if he is in Missouri. The most recent poll showed Bennett with an approval rating in the high 40s, which is usually good enough for getting re-elected.
Not if you're Pat Toomey, right? Also,
Michael Bennet is polling worse than Mark Udall did at this stage of the 2014 election cycle.
