MI-MRG: Clinton in close race with Bush, Fiorina, and Trump
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 10:53:06 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  MI-MRG: Clinton in close race with Bush, Fiorina, and Trump
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: MI-MRG: Clinton in close race with Bush, Fiorina, and Trump  (Read 1220 times)
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: September 24, 2015, 12:38:54 AM »
« edited: September 24, 2015, 12:41:32 AM by Fmr President & Senator Polnut »

Clinton wont win the Wolverine state by 10, she should win the dtate by four, just like Kerry did over a decade ago.

MI, WI & Pa usually polls with Natl average and Clinton is leading by four.

That's... not accurate. Kerry lost the national PV by 2.5 but won all of those states.

For example, WI has been an average of +3 more D than the nation as a whole since 1992. The same is true for MI and slightly for PA.

I did the work for you Tongue

Since 1992
WI - D+3 vs D national popular vote
MI - D+3 vs D national popular vote
PA - D+1.5 v D national popular vote

So if say a Hillary were to win by the same margin as Obama 51-47 in 2016...
You'd expect
WI - 54%
MI - 54%
PA - 52.5%
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,084
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: September 24, 2015, 02:11:21 AM »

Fun fact: almost exactly four years ago, MRG put Obama only 1 point ahead of Romney in Michigan.  Over a year later he went on to win it by nearly 10 points, of course.

And maybe that's what would have happened if the election had occurred in September 2011. Obama's approval on September 23, 2011 was 43/51 per RCP. On election day 2012, it was much better - 50/47.

Yeah but don't forget, Barack Obama was 50 years old in September 2011, whereas on election day he was 51.  However, Mitt Romney was 64 in September 2011, and then went on to be 65 on election day when Obama beat him.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.213 seconds with 13 queries.