Morning Consult nat. poll: Clinton trails Carson by 2, but leads all other ‘pubs
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 08:49:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Morning Consult nat. poll: Clinton trails Carson by 2, but leads all other ‘pubs
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Morning Consult nat. poll: Clinton trails Carson by 2, but leads all other ‘pubs  (Read 1564 times)
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 29, 2015, 10:24:48 PM »

Morning Consult national poll, conducted Sept. 24-27:

pdf link

Clinton 43%
Bush 40%

Clinton 44%
Paul 38%

Carson 44%
Clinton 42%

Clinton 45%
Rubio 38%

Clinton 45%
Trump 42%

Clinton 44%
Fiorina 38%
Logged
Skye
yeah_93
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,581
Venezuela


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 29, 2015, 10:28:49 PM »

I call bull on that 7-point lead against Rubio.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 29, 2015, 10:46:42 PM »

Carson's strength needs to stop right now. It's highly embarrassing for this country.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 29, 2015, 11:07:58 PM »

I call bull on that 7-point lead against Rubio.

and Carson leading ... anything.
Logged
100% pro-life no matter what
ExtremeRepublican
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,725


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 5.57


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 29, 2015, 11:19:15 PM »

I'm confused by how the state and national polls seem to be differing.  The state polls seem to collectively suggest that the GOP is up by about 5 points, but the national polls paint a much bleaker picture.  Opposite of 2012?
Logged
Bigby
Mod_Libertarian_GOPer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,164
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: 3.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 29, 2015, 11:21:27 PM »

Doesn't RCP disregard Morning Consult like they do Gravis?
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,763


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 29, 2015, 11:22:29 PM »
« Edited: September 29, 2015, 11:24:07 PM by The Mikado »

Doesn't RCP disregard Morning Consult like they do Gravis?

Yes, but IIRC the difference is that they disregard Gravis for its bad record and they disregard Morning Consult for its seeming lack of a record.

EDIT: Morning Consult was founded in 2013, so we don't have a good standard to judge their quality by.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 30, 2015, 10:02:23 AM »

Carson is the flavor of the month.
Logged
HillOfANight
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,459
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 30, 2015, 10:16:28 AM »

I'm confused by how the state and national polls seem to be differing.  The state polls seem to collectively suggest that the GOP is up by about 5 points, but the national polls paint a much bleaker picture.  Opposite of 2012?

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-07-22/the-polling-paradox-how-to-read-the-numbers
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,654
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 30, 2015, 10:18:02 AM »

Blue wall is of course NV, Nm, CO, Ia & Pa of course, but without a Bushie, Kasich or Rubio, the map is expanded.
Logged
HillOfANight
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,459
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 30, 2015, 12:49:00 PM »

Blue wall is of course NV, Nm, CO, Ia & Pa of course, but without a Bushie, Kasich or Rubio, the map is expanded.

IA seems questionable as part of the wall.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/nh/new_hampshire_bush_vs_clinton-4114.html
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/ia/iowa_bush_vs_clinton-3996.html

She's leading in NH, losing in IA. And in 2014, they let in nonmoderate Joni Ernst, while NH denied Scott Brown.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,654
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 30, 2015, 01:50:25 PM »

Iowa and Ohio are tipping point races and are winnable. Once she comes up with a running mate, her numbers will come up.

But, look at WI, it is like Iowa and Ohio, she is winning it convincingly.
Logged
JonathanSwift
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,122
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 06, 2015, 01:50:25 PM »

In this poll, Carson is ahead of Clinton by 1.88%, while Clinton beats Bush by 2.85%, Trump by 3.89%, Fiorina by 5.77%, Rubio by 6.29%, and Paul by 6.68%. Obama beat Romney by 3.86%. Thus, if we assume a uniform swing from 2012, we get these maps:

Carson vs. Clinton

299-239

Clinton vs. Bush

303-235

Clinton vs. Fiorina/Trump

332-206

Clinton vs. Paul/Rubio

347-191
Logged
ObamaThirdTerm
Rookie
**
Posts: 48


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 07, 2015, 03:37:58 AM »

So the least qualified Republican is ahead? Lord help us all.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.244 seconds with 13 queries.