Nebraska results by Congressional district

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

How come they don't seem to report them on the NE elections webpage. I found the ME ones here:

http://www.maine.gov/sos/cec/elec/2004n/pr.htm

[A18]

I think Dave has them on the Atlas.

[Alcon]

I suppose since none of the Congressional Districts were close, they just decided to not post. It could be there, buried, and probably is.

In any case, the results are:

District 1
Bush 169,888 (62.90%)
Kerry 96,314 (35.66%)
Nader 2,025 (0.75%)
Badnarik 656 (0.24%)
Peroutka 405 (0.15%)
Cobb 453 (0.17%)
Write-In 318 (0.12%)
Calero 30 (0.01%)

District 2
Bush 153,041 (60.17%)
Kerry 97,858 (38.47%)
Nader 1,731 (0.68%)
Badnarik 813 (0.32%)
Write-In 328 (0.13%)
Peroutka 305 (0.12%)
Cobb 261 (0.10%)
Calero 23 (0.01%)

District 3
Bush 189,885 (74.86%)
Kerry 60,156 (23.71%)
Nader 1,942 (0.77%)
Peroutka 604 (0.24%)
Badnarik 572 (0.23%)
Cobb 264 (0.10%)
Write-In 212 (0.08%)
Calero 29 (0.01%)

I'm pretty sure that Calero was a write-in, possibly standing in for Van Auken, who is not American-born.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Alright. Instead of needing 59,301 Ohio voters to vote differently, Kerry could have won with a swing of only 46,368 voters (2,995 NM, 10751 NV, 5,030 IA, and 27,592 NE-2 voters).

[A18]

Alright. Instead of needing 59,301 Ohio voters to vote differently, Kerry could have won with a swing of only 46,368 voters (2,995 NM, 10751 NV, 5,030 IA, and 27,592 NE-2 voters).

That would be a pretty drastic swing going by precentage, though. But I guess technically, it's correct.

[Beet]

Alright. Instead of needing 59,301 Ohio voters to vote differently, Kerry could have won with a swing of only 46,368 voters (2,995 NM, 10751 NV, 5,030 IA, and 27,592 NE-2 voters).

That would be a pretty drastic swing going by precentage, though. But I guess technically, it's correct.

District 3-wow. Wow.

[Gabu]

Alright. Instead of needing 59,301 Ohio voters to vote differently, Kerry could have won with a swing of only 46,368 voters (2,995 NM, 10751 NV, 5,030 IA, and 27,592 NE-2 voters).

That would be a smaller number of voters, yes, but overall probably not nearly as likely as the Ohio voters switching, mostly due to NE-2 being required.

[minionofmidas]

Alright. Instead of needing 59,301 Ohio voters to vote differently, Kerry could have won with a swing of only 46,368 voters (2,995 NM, 10751 NV, 5,030 IA, and 27,592 NE-2 voters).

That would be a pretty drastic swing going by precentage, though. But I guess technically, it's correct.

District 3-wow. Wow.

Western Nebraska looks weird on the county map. Lots of tiny tiny tiny counties, and they're all deep deep deep blue.

[zorkpolitics]

Alright. Instead of needing 59,301 Ohio voters to vote differently, Kerry could have won with a swing of only 46,368 voters (2,995 NM, 10751 NV, 5,030 IA, and 27,592 NE-2 voters).

Sorry you are incorrect.
With the switch of 46,268 voters, Bush would still win.  The EV would be Kerry 269, Bush 268, Edwards 1 (the wacko from MN).  With no candidate getting a majority, the election would go to the House and Bush would win