PA-PPP: Clinton and Sanders weak, Biden stronger (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 06:55:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  PA-PPP: Clinton and Sanders weak, Biden stronger (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: PA-PPP: Clinton and Sanders weak, Biden stronger  (Read 5224 times)
YaBoyNY
NYMillennial
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,469
United States


« on: October 16, 2015, 02:05:13 PM »

Morning Call seems to be more accurate Clinton leads by 2 43-41 percent. As Fox and PPP are overpolling GOP and especially Carson.

>Result surprises me
>I don't like result

You back up that Morning pollster must be more accurate here with absolutely zero sound proof just because you dislike a result and it surprises you. Now, I don't agree that we're seeing people like Christie up by five (not reality), but that's not the point. You have zero support for your claims of overpolling & that randomly the Morning Call pollster was more accurate, and thus your claim is fabricated. With current nationwide numbers for Carson and Rubio and such, it's not really a surprise they are well within the margin of error and even rather close in a state like PA.
 

No, PPP is off because the QU poll has Trump at 39 percent approval and Clinton at 42 percent approval enough for Clinton to win 51/49.

lol

I'm not sure where you are reading up on politics but if you think Clinton having a nationwide approval rating of 38-42% means an extremely confident nationwide 51% win you are literally off rocker. Not quite how it works. You also continue to speak as if it's March 2015 and Trump is dominating in the polls, we've got a minute before Trump has his hands anywhere close to the nomination.

Aren't you the guy who thinks Jeb Bush is going to win the nomination and the election?

lol
Logged
YaBoyNY
NYMillennial
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,469
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 16, 2015, 03:56:50 PM »

Morning Call seems to be more accurate Clinton leads by 2 43-41 percent. As Fox and PPP are overpolling GOP and especially Carson.

>Result surprises me
>I don't like result

You back up that Morning pollster must be more accurate here with absolutely zero sound proof just because you dislike a result and it surprises you. Now, I don't agree that we're seeing people like Christie up by five (not reality), but that's not the point. You have zero support for your claims of overpolling & that randomly the Morning Call pollster was more accurate, and thus your claim is fabricated. With current nationwide numbers for Carson and Rubio and such, it's not really a surprise they are well within the margin of error and even rather close in a state like PA.
 

No, PPP is off because the QU poll has Trump at 39 percent approval and Clinton at 42 percent approval enough for Clinton to win 51/49.

lol

I'm not sure where you are reading up on politics but if you think Clinton having a nationwide approval rating of 38-42% means an extremely confident nationwide 51% win you are literally off rocker. Not quite how it works. You also continue to speak as if it's March 2015 and Trump is dominating in the polls, we've got a minute before Trump has his hands anywhere close to the nomination.

Aren't you the guy who thinks Jeb Bush is going to win the nomination and the election?

lol

Simply Amazing. Atlas Liberal #5 to fire an irrelevant attack that has no main connection to the argument made in defense of something you don't like to hear or feel threatened with. You guys must embarrass some of the competent and mature liberals around this community.

Anyways, no I'm not that guy. I'm just the guy who does happen to currently support Jeb Bush for the nomination, but is not certain on who will come out with it next year. I, and many mainstream political scientists and junkies, realize Jeb could realistically win a tight GE against Hillary Clinton in 2016. Polling nationwide supports this isn't unreasonable. Despite it being early on, Hillary Clinton is in the sh**tter with the eyes of the nation and is weak in normally solid D states. Which is no surprise, as she is a consistently pandering and lying broad who's electability is attained from her celebrity status not her ability to lead the country. So, my thoughts are everything but unreasonable but thank you though.

Do yourself a favor and elect a politician who actually believes what is coming out of their mouth, at least throw Bernie in the ring. Hillary will literally switch up & chalk together anything further and further left to hold progressive voters' eyeballs on her and you guys are too idiotic to see it. In that way, she behaves like Donald Trump does for the Republicans.

lol joke post lol
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.