National Turnout Change by County
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 09:43:34 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  National Turnout Change by County
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: National Turnout Change by County  (Read 622 times)
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 10, 2015, 06:14:26 PM »

I've done a few maps like this in the past, but I'm making it into something of a series. Gold counties cast more votes than they did in the previous year while purple counties cast fewer. 

I'm missing a map for 1996 - 2000 but will work on making it soon.

1984 - 1988



1988 - 1992



1992 - 1996



2000 - 2004



2004 - 2008



2008 - 2012


Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 10, 2015, 07:14:05 PM »

Fascinating stuff. Some of it is population growth/decline, some of it could be very strategic turnout machines. Looks like Al Gore being on the ballot really helped Clinton carry Tennessee and Georgia. And that Native American turnout surge in South Dakota, I'm guessing, has to be related to the hotly contested Senate race in 2004. Daschle was probably counting on Native Americans to carry him across the finish line.
Logged
bobloblaw
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,018
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2015, 03:15:19 PM »

Fascinating stuff. Some of it is population growth/decline, some of it could be very strategic turnout machines. Looks like Al Gore being on the ballot really helped Clinton carry Tennessee and Georgia. And that Native American turnout surge in South Dakota, I'm guessing, has to be related to the hotly contested Senate race in 2004. Daschle was probably counting on Native Americans to carry him across the finish line.


2004-2008 you can see the black vote
Logged
bobloblaw
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,018
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 28, 2015, 03:16:29 PM »

Fascinating stuff. Some of it is population growth/decline, some of it could be very strategic turnout machines. Looks like Al Gore being on the ballot really helped Clinton carry Tennessee and Georgia. And that Native American turnout surge in South Dakota, I'm guessing, has to be related to the hotly contested Senate race in 2004. Daschle was probably counting on Native Americans to carry him across the finish line.


2004-2008 you can see the black vote

You can see why in 2012 Obama won VA and barely lost NC. Turnout didnt fall very much. Look at IL, big turnout drop.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.219 seconds with 12 queries.