Did Lyndon Johnson Underperform in 1964? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 01:06:01 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Did Lyndon Johnson Underperform in 1964? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Did Lyndon Johnson Underperform in 1964?  (Read 5018 times)
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,214
United States


« on: December 30, 2015, 12:12:35 PM »

Georgia and Arizona should've been won.

I mean Georgia never voted GOP even once, they were straightly Democratic even right after the Civil War.


Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,214
United States


« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2016, 05:50:49 PM »


Bradley effect/Shy Tory effect??

A sizeable amount of people tend to report to pollsters the more popular answer when polled which might of made LBJ looked better in the polls than in reality despite polling upwards of 70% at one point.

Goldwater actually polled far better in the Plains and the West then he actually preformed in the general election. Time magazine even predicted that Goldwater would win Wyoming, which he actually lost by about twelve points.

Georgia and Arizona should've been won.

I mean Georgia never voted GOP even once, they were straightly Democratic even right after the Civil War.

And the issue that made GA always vote Democratic made them flip sides in 1964.

Only by 9 points, a little more work in Atlanta and the "Black Belt" could easily have at least garnered a plurality.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 12 queries.