Smoking Gun: Email Suggests Hillary Broke Law

[henster]

http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/smoking-gun-email-suggests-hillary-committed-a-crime/

http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/08/politics/hillary-clinton-emails-2016/index.html

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/265210-email-clinton-asked-adviser-to-send-secure-fax-by-email

[Asian Nazi]

Sad to see how desperate the Sanders hacks on this forum are to blow another made-up "scandal" out of proportion.  Give it up, you clowns have no chance.

[This account no longer in use.]

Praise whichever deity you personally believe in.

[Ebsy]

How much do you bet that the document wasn't classified or was never sent unclassified, thus making this, again, much ado about nothing? Do you not think the FBI had seen this during their investigation and looked further to see what the document(talking points) was and if it indeed was classified?

[This account no longer in use.]

Personally, I'm much more offended that her email address is "hrod17".

[Phony Moderate]

How much do you bet that the document wasn't classified or was never sent unclassified, thus making this, again, much ado about nothing? Do you not think the FBI had seen this during their investigation and looked further to see what the document(talking points) was and if it indeed was classified?

The FBI hasn't always been known for honesty and/or competence.

[Ebsy]

How much do you bet that the document wasn't classified or was never sent unclassified, thus making this, again, much ado about nothing? Do you not think the FBI had seen this during their investigation and looked further to see what the document(talking points) was and if it indeed was classified?

The FBI hasn't always been known for honesty and/or competence.

If they aren't competent or honest, then why do those suffering from HDS seem to believe that the FBI is going to have her indicted? The dissonance from some people is astounding.

[henster]

At this point I think there's a 40% chance someone gets indicted not necessarily Clinton but probably an aide.

[Landslide Lyndon]

Seriously, are people still talking about the e-mail scandal?

[Eraserhead]

Seems like Clinton and Sanders both have about five new "scandals" each every day now. Whatever. This is probably nothing.

[Hillary pays minimum wage]

Seems like Clinton and Sanders both have about five new "scandals" each every day now. Whatever. This is probably nothing.

You'd be saying the same thing if Dick Cheney were involved instead of Hillary Clinton?

[Eraserhead]

Seems like Clinton and Sanders both have about five new "scandals" each every day now. Whatever. This is probably nothing.

You'd be saying the same thing if Dick Cheney were involved instead of Hillary Clinton?

No, you caught me. I'm a total Hillary hack!

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Seems like Clinton and Sanders both have about five new "scandals" each every day now. Whatever. This is probably nothing.

These "Scandals" are ammo for each hack to use against eachother. Unless it is all over social media and the news it isn't really a scandal.

[Hillary pays minimum wage]

Seems like Clinton and Sanders both have about five new "scandals" each every day now. Whatever. This is probably nothing.

You'd be saying the same thing if Dick Cheney were involved instead of Hillary Clinton?

No, you caught me. I'm a total Hillary hack!

That's what I'm saying.  Democrats only think of things from their own party's perspective when it comes to things like this. Be more open minded and tolerant of those who think different than you. What would your reaction be if it was Dick Cheney involved in this scandal?

[Adam Griffin]

This is not just "disturbing", but Deeply Disturbing™!

[Oakvale]

Sad to see how desperate the Sanders hacks on this forum are to blow another made-up "scandal" out of proportion.  Give it up, you clowns have no chance.

Anything to distract from the latest craven antics of the Sanders crime family. Sad!

[This account no longer in use.]

Sad to see how desperate the Sanders hacks on this forum are to blow another made-up "scandal" out of proportion.  Give it up, you clowns have no chance.

Anything to distract from the latest craven antics of the Sanders crime family. Sad!

Does Sanders even have a family? I have never heard anything about them, besides his wife.

[Labuan Bajo]

Seems like Clinton and Sanders both have about five new "scandals" each every day now. Whatever. This is probably nothing.

You'd be saying the same thing if Dick Cheney were involved instead of Hillary Clinton?

No, you caught me. I'm a total Hillary hack!

That's what I'm saying.  Democrats only think of things from their own party's perspective when it comes to things like this. Be more open minded and tolerant of those who think different than you. What would your reaction be if it was Dick Cheney involved in this scandal?

Not at all the same situation. Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders are running for President. Dick Cheney is the retired Vice President, and has been out of office and American political life for six years. The news coverage and reaction would obviously be different.

[SillyAmerican]

Sad to see how desperate the Sanders hacks on this forum are to blow another made-up "scandal" out of proportion.  Give it up, you clowns have no chance.

Yeah, it must be all those Sanders hacks over at CNN. Between the Sanders hacks and those involved in the right wing conspiracy, it's amazing she finds any time at all to help the American people realize their dream of a Hillary presidency!

http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/08/politics/hillary-clinton-personal-email-staffer-state-department/index.html

Drip, drip, drip...

[GOP732]

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/265402-report-fbi-expanding-clinton-investigation-to-look-into-public-corruption

I know this article has 3 unnamed sources, but there is clearly an active investigation and it's just no good for Clinton no matter how you slice it.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/01/11/fbis-clinton-probe-expands-to-public-corruption-track.html

There are 100-150 agents on this case.

[bobloblaw]

Sad to see how desperate the Sanders hacks on this forum are to blow another made-up "scandal" out of proportion.  Give it up, you clowns have no chance.

The FBI will determine that.

[This account no longer in use.]

Sad to see how desperate the Sanders hacks on this forum are to blow another made-up "scandal" out of proportion.  Give it up, you clowns have no chance.

The FBI will determine that.

Troll versus troll, eh? This will be rather interesting.

[SillyAmerican]

Three little things.

(1) There were messages on Mrs. Clinton's server that lawmakers are unable to read, because the content of those messages are too sensitive (which is to say, above top secret).

(2) Telling people who send you sensitive information to "remove the headers" is not a good idea.

(3) Saying that a message was not marked as classified is a bit odd, especially given the fact that the person saying this is the Secretary of State, who acts as a classifying authority (which is to say, she should be able to tell you the classification of a message, given its contents).

Smoking gun? We'll see what the FBI says...

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

The State Department wants to delay the release until after Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, South Carolina vote. There must be some bad stuff for Hillary there that they want to hide from the voters of the first 4 states.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/266904-state-dept-meets-opposition-in-delaying-clinton-email-release

[ProgressiveCanadian]

The State Department wants to delay the release until after Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, South Carolina vote. There must be some bad stuff for Hillary there that they want to hide from the voters of the first 4 states.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/266904-state-dept-meets-opposition-in-delaying-clinton-email-release

What the heck are they trying to hide?!