Most pollsters don't have the balls to poll Iowa at all (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 07:34:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Process
  Polling (Moderator: muon2)
  Most pollsters don't have the balls to poll Iowa at all (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Most pollsters don't have the balls to poll Iowa at all  (Read 1735 times)
A Perez
Rookie
**
Posts: 231
« on: January 10, 2016, 08:13:03 AM »
« edited: January 10, 2016, 08:14:47 AM by A Perez »

Pollsters who poll national results are immune from evaluation, since there is no such thing as a national primary contest.
On the other hand, PPP, Quinnipiac, Selzer,  etc. Risk their reputation by daring to forecast states, such as Iowa.

Fox , Yougov, etc. are not confident enough in their ability to predict these difficult state contests.
That's why we have so few Iowa polls despite Iowa being as important or more important than national numbers.
Grow balls and give us more state polls, especially the early ones (Iowa, NH and SC).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 14 queries.