Where would you place ISIS on the political spectrum?

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

?

[SWE]

Fiscally conservative

[🦀🎂🦀🎂]

State's rights populism

[Grand Wizard Lizard of the Klan]

Small OT: I've seen few months ago in the Internet few not-trolling left-wing anti-imperialists supporting ISIS as posthumous child of Sadamist regime bravely fighting with puppets of imperialists.

[DavidB.]

Bullsh**t poll

[Sprouts Farmers Market ✘]

All liberal, all the time

[RR1997]

This thread is so Atlas

[Classic Conservative]

NOTA, Islamic Fundamentalism

[Clark Kent]

Far-left because it'll be funny

[Supersonic]

It's difficult as one could say IS in Syria is more economically conservative and IS in Iraq more socially conservative.

[PJ]

true centrists united against the far-left and far-right.

[Kingpoleon]

Anarcho-fascist. Closest to an anarcho-socialist(who are actually pretty good and close to me, apparently). I'd vote far-left, as it unites the common people into a military, not a militarized people into powerful terrorists.

[Torie]

"Moderate hero" is probably the best description really. Odd that BRTD didn't include that option.

[RINO Tom]

Voted far left to troll this retarded poll.

[Sumner 1868]

Fiscally conservative

But socially liberal.

[The Free North]

Well strictly speaking they seek a theocracy where (presumably) a religious figurehead presides over the state. That being said this would differ from Iranian theocracy because the ISIS cleric in charge of the state would probably also be heavily involved in military conquests and Jihad as well and use his victories on the battlefield to legitimize his regime.


So i'm going to go with 'rouge crusader state' as my final answer.

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

They have quite an advanced welfare state and allow women to commit jihad. Obviously center-left. Perhaps Christian Democratic, amirite?

[Goldwater]

Populist.

[Murica!]

Anarcho-fascist. Closest to an anarcho-socialist(who are actually pretty good and close to me, apparently). I'd vote far-left, as it unites the common people into a military, not a militarized people into powerful terrorists.

Your joking right?

[Kingpoleon]

Anarcho-fascist. Closest to an anarcho-socialist(who are actually pretty good and close to me, apparently). I'd vote far-left, as it unites the common people into a military, not a militarized people into powerful terrorists.

Your joking right?

I should probably specify common people into disorganized but powerful terrorists.

Hitler used an existing structure to unite the common people into militarized and strictly disciplined terrorists. A far-left equivalent would create a militarized, mob-like group of terrorists if you put any belief in the horse shoe theory.

[Murica!]

Anarcho-fascist. Closest to an anarcho-socialist(who are actually pretty good and close to me, apparently). I'd vote far-left, as it unites the common people into a military, not a militarized people into powerful terrorists.

Your joking right?

I should probably specify common people into disorganized but powerful terrorists.

Hitler used an existing structure to unite the common people into militarized and strictly disciplined terrorists. A far-left equivalent would create a militarized, mob-like group of terrorists if you put any belief in the horse shoe theory.

Oh jesus, your not joking. Okay, I understand that you haven't read anything from any Anarchist thinkers but you could at least read the Wikipedia article on Anarchism or something.

[ElectionsGuy]

If we're actually taking this seriously, they are reactionary, which by definition is far-right. I don't think this was meant to be serious though.