MN-Mason Dixon: D: Clinton 59% Sanders 25%; R: Rubio 23% Cruz 21% Trump 18%

[Senator Cris]

Clinton 59%
Sanders 25%
O'Malley 1%

Rubio 23%
Cruz 21%
Trump 18%
Carson 11%
Bush 7%
Christie 5%

https://twitter.com/pollreport/status/691165967204757504
https://twitter.com/pollreport/status/691166795588202496

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Both sides look suspect.

[MaxQue]

Aren't Mason-Dixon really bad these days?

I remember in 2012 than polls of their polls proved to be very off the mark.

Yeah, 2nd worst pollster of 2012 according to Nate Silver ratings. They were always off, and not in any particular direction.

[Tender Branson]

MN could be one of these states that react allergically to fascists like TRUMP.

The Dem numbers on the other hand look strange.

[Mr. Morden]

Even if we had a poll from a "good" pollster, I doubt it would be terribly indicative of where things stand here.  The turnout in caucus states that are not Iowa tends to be pretty terrible, which leads to the polling being rather poor as a gauge of what's going to happen.  As I recall, in 2008, Obama massacred Clinton in most of the caucus states, even though the polling in most of them (including MN) had her competitive, if not ahead.

[Phony Moderate]

MN could be one of these states that react allergically to fascists like TRUMP.

The Dem numbers on the other hand look strange.

Or maybe it's just a low energy state.

[Eraserhead]

Ridiculous numbers for both sides.

[A Perez]

Aren't Mason-Dixon really bad these days?

I remember in 2012 than polls of their polls proved to be very off the mark.

Yeah, 2nd worst pollster of 2012 according to Nate Silver ratings. They were always off, and not in any particular direction.

Stop lying. Mason Dixon gets B+ in Silver's ratings  http://fivethirtyeight.com/interactives/pollster-ratings/

[Averroës Nix]

Here's what you might call a red flag:

[/]

[Why]

When was the last poll, not from Iowa, that did not have Trump leading?
When was the last poll to show Trump in third place?

Highly skeptical of this poll.

[Eraserhead]

Here's what you might call a red flag:

Looks like this is about as useful as a "poll" from Overtime Politics.

[IceSpear]

Junk poll!

[Holmes]

They Overtime'd it.

[Obama-Biden Democrat]

"Romney has pretty much nailed down Florida," said Brad Coker of Mason-Dixon Polling and Research, which conducted the poll for the Times and its media partners. "Unless something dramatically changes — an October surprise, a major gaffe — Romney's going to win Florida.''

http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/national/tampa-bay-timesbay-news-9-poll-i-4-voters-back-romney-51-45/1258459

Go home Mason Dixon, you are drunk.

[morgieb]

Hey, 9 months ago called. It wants its poll back.

[Badger]

"Romney has pretty much nailed down Florida," said Brad Coker of Mason-Dixon Polling and Research, which conducted the poll for the Times and its media partners. "Unless something dramatically changes — an October surprise, a major gaffe — Romney's going to win Florida.''

http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/national/tampa-bay-timesbay-news-9-poll-i-4-voters-back-romney-51-45/1258459

Go home Mason Dixon, you are drunk.

well, in fairness Obama's response to Hurricaine Sandy probably was just sort of the type of October surprise referred to. plus that was a rather sweeping statement to make based on a 6 point in a sigle region of the state (albeit a crucial swing region).

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Gee, they almost got the margin right. They were only 57 points off.

[Wells]

Gee, they almost got the margin right. They were only 57 points off.

Their Republican numbers were really close, though. It's almost like Michigan.