Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 09, 2019, 12:10:47 am
News: 2020 U.S. Senate Predictions are now active.

  Atlas Forum
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  IA-Quinnipiac: R: Trump 31% Cruz 24% Rubio 17%; D: Sanders 49% Clinton 46%
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: IA-Quinnipiac: R: Trump 31% Cruz 24% Rubio 17%; D: Sanders 49% Clinton 46%  (Read 1488 times)
Senator Cris
Cris
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5,539
Italy



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 01, 2016, 08:15:08 am »

Trump 31%
Cruz 24%
Rubio 17%
Carson 8%
Bush/Paul 4%
Huckabee 3%
Fiorina/Kasich 2%
Christie/Santorum 1%
Gilmore 0%

Sanders 49%
Clinton 46%
O'Malley 3%

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/news-and-events/quinnipiac-university-poll/iowa/release-detail?ReleaseID=2320
Logged
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8,301


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 01, 2016, 08:20:08 am »

From last poll:

Rubio +4
Carson +1
Huckabee +1
Kasich +1
Fiorina +1
Santorum +1
Trump +0
Bush +0
Gilmore +0
Paul -1
Christie -2
Cruz -5

Clinton +1
Sanders 0
O'Malley -1
Logged
#TheShadowyAbyss
LibertarianRepublican
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10,554
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -1.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 01, 2016, 08:24:10 am »

Lol Quinnipiac.
Logged
Sorenroy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1,378
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -3.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 01, 2016, 08:27:19 am »

Change from last poll/Month:
Candidate — Percentage (Change Poll/Month)

Republicans:
Trump — 31 (0/+3)
Cruz — 24 (-5/-3)
Rubio — 17 (+4/+3)
Carson — 8 (+1/-2)
Paul — 4 (-1/0)
Bush — 4 (0/-1)
Fiorina — 2 (+1/-1)
Kasich — 2 (+1/+1)
Huckabee — 3 (+1/+2)
Christie — 1 (-2/-2)
Santorum — 1 (+1/+1)
Gilmore — 0 (0*/0*)

Democrats:
Sanders — 49 (0/+9)
Clinton — 46 (+1/-5)
O'Malley — 3 (-1/-3)
Logged
Mr. Morden
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 40,321
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 01, 2016, 08:30:43 am »

On the Dem. side, more evidence that Clinton has become the high income, high education level candidate:

college degree:
Clinton 50%
Sanders 43%

no college degree:
Sanders 54%
Clinton 43%

income <$50k:
Sanders 58%
Clinton 38%

income >$100k:
Clinton 53%
Sanders 41%

Also, we still have a massive gender gap, and massive age gap:

men:
Sanders 63%
Clinton 32%

women:
Clinton 56%
Sanders 39%

under age 45:
Sanders 74%
Clinton 23%

over age 65:
Clinton 71%
Sanders 24%

On the GOP side, who leads among…?

Tea Party: Cruz
white Evangelicals: Cruz
very conservative: Cruz
somewhat conservative: Trump
moderate: Trump
men: Trump
women: Cruz
college degree: Rubio
no college degree: Trump
income <$50k: Trump
income $50-100k: Cruz/Trump tie
income >$100k: Trump
first time caucus attendee: Trump
have attended caucus before: Cruz
most important issue = economy: Trump
most important issue = terrorism: Cruz/Trump tie
most important issue = immigration: Trump
most important issue = federal deficit: Cruz

2nd choice:
Cruz 19%
Rubio 17%
Carson 12%
Trump 9%
Bush 5%
Christie 5%
Fiorina 5%
Paul 5%
Huckabee 4%

Are there any candidates you would definitely *not* support? (multiple responses allowed)

Trump 35%
Bush 21%
Cruz 15%
Kasich 13%
Christie 12%
Paul 10%
Fiorina 9%
Gilmore 9%
Rubio 9%
Santorum 9%
Carson 7%
Huckabee 7%
Logged
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,692
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 01, 2016, 08:32:32 am »

Damn that age gap on the Democratic side...
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19,501
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 01, 2016, 08:33:21 am »

QU has been a little off the median this season so far, this is their first test.
Logged
Skye
yeah_93
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,404
Venezuela


Political Matrix
E: 3.29, S: -1.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 01, 2016, 08:42:54 am »

So... Rubiosurge is real?
Logged
HillOfANight
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1,459
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 01, 2016, 09:13:50 am »


Seems like they either polled 17 year olds or 80 year olds.
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8,188
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 01, 2016, 09:15:07 am »


Yep, I wouldn't even rule a Rubio win out anymore.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 50,969
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 01, 2016, 09:21:36 am »

Damn ... that age gap.

If only the olds are turning out today, Sanders is not only fu**ed: He's sooo fu**ed.

So, young and middle-aged people of Iowa: Go caucus.
Logged
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,646
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 01, 2016, 09:49:51 am »

It is proportioned to reflect the likely demographic. More new registrations should go to Sanders, a high turnout will almost certainly mean a Sanders victory, while a moderate to low turnout will be a Clinton victory.

With the cold & snow in Iowa, I think a young people surge in voting is more likely than an old people surge for Hillary.

*Fingers crossed*, waiting for the turnout
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length
Logout

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC