SC - Clemson: Clinton +50

[Holmes]

http://newsstand.clemson.edu/mediarelations/clinton-will-win-by-wide-margin-in-south-carolina-palmetto-poll-shows/

Clinton 64
Sanders 14

Feb 20 - 25, 650 polled, MoE +/- 3%.

It's a university poll. But consistent with Clinton being up 30-40% in other Southern states like Georgia and Texas. So.

[#TheShadowyAbyss]

University poll that has Sanders under 15%? REEEEEE, throw this in the trash.

[Crumpets]

I saw the title and thought that it meant Clinton was at 50% and I was like , but then I saw the poll, and now I'm like even though I agree it's probably trash.

[windjammer]

JUNK JUNK JUNK

[Holmes]

I wonder why University polls underestimate the losing candidate most of the time? Clinton is for sure probably at 64%, but Sanders at 14% is just such an embarrassing thing to publish.

[IceSpear]

This is gonna be a thrashing, but unfortunately it won't be anywhere near this big of one.

[A Perez]

University poll that has Sanders under 15%? REEEEEE, throw this in the trash.

No polling expert ever said that university polls are worse than Non-university polls.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

I wonder why University polls underestimate the losing candidate most of the time? Clinton is for sure probably at 64%, but Sanders at 14% is just such an embarrassing thing to publish.

Well this is a trash poll but since it overestimates Clinton you couldn't help but to publish it.

[Holmes]

I wonder why University polls underestimate the losing candidate most of the time? Clinton is for sure probably at 64%, but Sanders at 14% is just such an embarrassing thing to publish.

Well this is a trash poll but since it overestimates Clinton you couldn't help but to publish it.

I didn't publish this poll.

[Eraserhead]

Uh... did the survey include any white people?

[Fmr. Pres. Duke]

If this is anywhere close then Bernie is dead

[Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon]

Uh... did the survey include any white people?

[Xing]

If the current polls are accurate (which we'll find out soon enough), then Sanders is toast. He can't win the nomination if he's losing GA/SC by 50, and TX by more than 30. I can certainly live with Hillary as the nominee, but I'll want to take a break from this forum, considering how absolutely unbearable the Hillary hacks here will be, if the polls are right.

[Averroës Nix]

Notice:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

So the result isn't ridiculous. But, as it's not meant to include all likely voters, I'm not sure why the aggregators are even including this one.

[socaldem]

Notice:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

So the result isn't ridiculous. But, as it's not meant to include all likely voters, I'm not sure why the aggregators are even including this one.

So this poll excludes anyone under 22 years old? The youth are like 80%+ Sanders voters...

[The Other Castro]

Watch CNN point to this poll after SC saying "WOW Sanders outperformed the polls by 25 points!"

[Eraserhead]

Watch CNN point to this poll after SC saying "WOW Sanders outperformed the polls by 25 points!"

That'd be fantastic! Fingers crossed.

[IceSpear]

Watch CNN point to this poll after SC saying "WOW Sanders outperformed the polls by 25 points!"

LOL. I could see them doing that. Luckily it's only a single poll and doesn't seem to be getting too much attention. If multiple polls were showing similar numbers I'd start to be a bit nervous about that.

[Holmes]

Notice:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

So the result isn't ridiculous. But, as it's not meant to include all likely voters, I'm not sure why the aggregators are even including this one.

So this poll excludes anyone under 22 years old? The youth are like 80%+ Sanders voters...

They're excluded if they're indicated that they don't plan to vote in the primary. Otherwise they're included.

[President Johnson]

JUNK JUNK JUNK

[socaldem]

Notice:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

So the result isn't ridiculous. But, as it's not meant to include all likely voters, I'm not sure why the aggregators are even including this one.

So this poll excludes anyone under 22 years old? The youth are like 80%+ Sanders voters...

They're excluded if they're indicated that they don't plan to vote in the primary. Otherwise they're included.

The exvlusion wuoted above sers forth two parameters--intention to vote AND voting history. Young voters by virtue of a ge have no voting history.

[Holmes]

Notice:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

So the result isn't ridiculous. But, as it's not meant to include all likely voters, I'm not sure why the aggregators are even including this one.

So this poll excludes anyone under 22 years old? The youth are like 80%+ Sanders voters...

They're excluded if they're indicated that they don't plan to vote in the primary. Otherwise they're included.

The exvlusion wuoted above sers forth two parameters--intention to vote AND voting history. Young voters by virtue of a ge have no voting history.

I read it as the poll includes 1) people who say they're likely to vote in this election and 2) have voted in the last two out of three statewide primaries. But yeah, the wording is pretty vague and it won't matter in 7 hours anyway.

[IceSpear]

New SC gold standard? lol

[Holmes]

Heh.

[Mehmentum]

VINDICATED!