Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 19, 2019, 02:05:46 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  Election Archive
| | |-+  All Archived Boards
| | | |-+  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls (Moderators: AndrewTX, Likely Voter)
| | | | |-+  WI - Marquette University: Clinton in close races (minus Trump), Sanders up big
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: WI - Marquette University: Clinton in close races (minus Trump), Sanders up big  (Read 1866 times)
Gass3268
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18,749
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 25, 2016, 01:42:59 pm »

Marquette University General Election Poll

Clinton 47%
Trump 37%

Clinton 43%
Cruz 43%

Clinton 44%
Rubio 43%

Sanders 54%
Trump 34%

Sanders 53%
Cruz 35%

Sanders 53%
Rubio 35%

Full pdf to be released soon.
Logged
Wiz in Wis
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2,508


View Profile WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2016, 01:51:37 pm »

At what point do we start dismissing the Clinton/Rubio and Clinton/Cruz numbers as useless?
Logged
IceSpear
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30,708
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.65, S: -5.70

P P

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 25, 2016, 01:57:14 pm »

At what point do we start dismissing the Clinton/Rubio and Clinton/Cruz numbers as useless?

2 days ago
Logged
Gass3268
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18,749
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 25, 2016, 02:08:17 pm »

Trump is probably not winning Wisconsin

Quote
MULawPoll ‏@MULawPoll  15s16 seconds ago
Overall, net favorability ratings are Sanders +11, Kasich +6, Rubio -8, Cruz -18, Clinton -18, Trump -43. #mulawpoll
Logged
olowakandi
olawakandi
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 23,471
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 25, 2016, 02:29:21 pm »

Hes gonna lose it by 5 points
Logged
pbrower2a
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19,933
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 25, 2016, 03:09:45 pm »

At what point do we start dismissing the Clinton/Rubio and Clinton/Cruz numbers as useless?

When they concede or are mathematically eliminated.
Logged
Vosem
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9,912
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: -6.26

P P

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 25, 2016, 03:11:03 pm »

At what point do we start dismissing the Clinton/Rubio and Clinton/Cruz numbers as useless?

When they concede or are mathematically eliminated.

After the election, when one of them (probably Rubio) has beaten Clinton.
Logged
President Johnson
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8,127
Germany


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 25, 2016, 03:13:47 pm »

Come on Donald, you can win this one.
Logged
yeah_93
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2,863
Venezuela


Political Matrix
E: 3.29, S: -1.30

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 25, 2016, 03:22:23 pm »

At what point do we start dismissing the Clinton/Rubio and Clinton/Cruz numbers as useless?
Also, Sanders/everyone.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 28,712
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 25, 2016, 03:30:37 pm »

At what point do we start dismissing the Clinton/Rubio and Clinton/Cruz numbers as useless?

When they concede or are mathematically eliminated.

After the election, when one of them (probably Rubio) has beaten Clinton.

That is a low energy post if I ever saw one.
Logged
olowakandi
olawakandi
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 23,471
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 25, 2016, 04:29:12 pm »

Sanders isnt Joe Biden, either, as we saw in NV. He's not going do that much  better than Clinton would in GE. Biden will keep it close too. We can all put to rest that this election is gonna be won handily by Dems. They are keeping it close enough to win at end.
« Last Edit: February 25, 2016, 04:32:02 pm by Da-Jon »Logged
Devils30
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1,874
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 25, 2016, 04:32:03 pm »

If Sanders voters come to Hillary, she'll win this by an Obama 08 margin. Not buying the Trump in WI, MI thing at all yet. Maybe he gets a boost in southern Ohio and western PA.
Logged
riceowl
riceowl315
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,686


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 25, 2016, 04:45:47 pm »

Yeah...yeah.  All these general election polls.  There are so many undecideds that are people voting for the other candidates that are refusing to say they would vote for the same-party opposition.  There's no way there are actually 14% of the people in Wisconsin who don't know who they would vote for between Clinton and Cruz.
Logged
Devils30
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1,874
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 25, 2016, 06:31:09 pm »

I'm pretty sure these undecideds aren't exactly flocking to Trump. Hillary just must demonstrate competent leadership skills, nothing spectacular. The bar is much lower vs Trump.
Logged
Buh her emails!
diskymike44
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2,388


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 25, 2016, 08:46:13 pm »

If Sanders voters come to Hillary, she'll win this by an Obama 08 margin. Not buying the Trump in WI, MI thing at all yet. Maybe he gets a boost in southern Ohio and western PA.

She should get about 85% or 95% of the Sanders supporters. The other 5% will probably vote for Vermin Supreme.
Logged
Devils30
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1,874
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: February 25, 2016, 11:21:17 pm »

Wisconsin and Iowa seem like poor fits for Trump, Hillary should take both.
Logged
Ebsy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7,723
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: February 26, 2016, 03:01:43 am »

Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Michigan always pretend like they are going to be swing states, but in November go for the Democrats.
Logged
pbrower2a
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19,933
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: February 26, 2016, 11:25:33 am »

Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Michigan always pretend like they are going to be swing states, but in November go for the Democrats.

In 2000 and 2004 all three states were very close. Between unions and minorities, Michigan is probably gone for the  Reactionary Party.
« Last Edit: February 26, 2016, 04:18:19 pm by pbrower2a »Logged
ElectionsGuy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16,189
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.87, S: -6.96

P P
View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: February 26, 2016, 06:01:42 pm »

Trump is probably not winning Wisconsin

Quote
MULawPoll ‏@MULawPoll  15s16 seconds ago
Overall, net favorability ratings are Sanders +11, Kasich +6, Rubio -8, Cruz -18, Clinton -18, Trump -43. #mulawpoll

If Trump's the nominee, forget Lean D, Likely D will be an appropriate rating.
Logged
Devils30
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1,874
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: February 26, 2016, 06:14:48 pm »

People seem to think WI is more favorable to someone like Trump than it is. The polling/FB like maps pretty much show MN WI IA isn't his best place and don't expect the trends he might get in OH, western PA. 
Logged
YaBoyNY
NYMillennial
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1,496
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: February 26, 2016, 06:53:09 pm »

At what point do we start dismissing the Clinton/Rubio and Clinton/Cruz numbers as useless?

When they concede or are mathematically eliminated.

After the election, when one of them (probably Rubio) has beaten Clinton.

What's it like to have a mind so utterly divorced from reality, Vosem?

Logged
pbrower2a
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19,933
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: February 27, 2016, 09:57:26 am »

At what point do we start dismissing the Clinton/Rubio and Clinton/Cruz numbers as useless?
Also, Sanders/everyone.

At that I refer to the primaries, and not the general election.

At what point do we start dismissing the Clinton/Rubio and Clinton/Cruz numbers as useless?

When they concede or are mathematically eliminated.

After the election, when one of them (probably Rubio) has beaten Clinton.

You assume a collapse by the Democratic nominee and deny the possibility of a collapse by the Republican nominee. Either is similarly likely.

Just remember: wishful thinking and $2 will get you a $2 cup of coffee. $2 and more rational thought will get you the same $2 cup of coffee.

Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length
Logout

Terms of Service

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines