Economic Systems (different version) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 05:44:03 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Economic Systems (different version) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which system is best?
#1
Anarchy
 
#2
Laissez-faire
 
#3
Laissez-faire lite (1890s U.S.)
 
#4
Socialism lite (U.S.)
 
#5
Eurosocialism (Europe)
 
#6
Communism (USSR)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 40

Author Topic: Economic Systems (different version)  (Read 3596 times)
DanielX
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,126
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -4.70

« on: May 31, 2005, 02:44:24 PM »

1890 is good all you need is some restrictions on monopolies and trusts to keep companies from hurting consumers.

Pretty much. Probably the closest to ideal economic system would be the US approximately 1910.
Logged
DanielX
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,126
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -4.70

« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2005, 11:07:58 PM »

1890 is good all you need is some restrictions on monopolies and trusts to keep companies from hurting consumers.

Pretty much. Probably the closest to ideal economic system would be the US approximately 1910.

Are you, DanielX, a millionaire?

Not even close. I want to be one someday, though.
Logged
DanielX
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,126
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -4.70

« Reply #2 on: May 31, 2005, 11:23:59 PM »

1890 is good all you need is some restrictions on monopolies and trusts to keep companies from hurting consumers.

Pretty much. Probably the closest to ideal economic system would be the US approximately 1910.

Are you, DanielX, a millionaire?

Not even close. I want to be one someday, though.

Well, good luck with that.  Though the odds are against you, it is possible.  One thing to consider though - you will probably be an old man by the time you attain that goal.  Life after about 60 or 65 isn't actually worth much.

I would recommend enjoying the moment rather than striving for a wealthy decrepitude.

I intend to do both. Careful budgeting, and a career in computers, will both go a long way. Also, I intend to do some investing (probably fairly conservative, mutual funds, some gold in case the dollar, euro, and yen all tank at once, maybe some bank bonds).

Plus, you don't know what 65 will be like when I'm 65 (that's still 47 years away for me). And i come from a fairly long-lived family (all grandparents lived into their 80s, and didn't really start to go down the tubes until the wrong side of 75). And even without considering that, i could still choose who gets my money - or maybe buy myself a fountain of youth Wink.

Incidentally, there's living and there's living. I do intend to get married (which would mean more $$$), and possibly have children (which would mean a good deal less $$$ - each kid costs something like $200,000 to a family, on average).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 14 queries.