Democratic Super Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 09:04:07 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Democratic Super Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23 24 ... 30
Author Topic: Democratic Super Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET)  (Read 43462 times)
/
darthebearnc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,367
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #450 on: March 01, 2016, 10:20:18 PM »

Yeah, I think Sanders is ahead in MN.
Logged
The Free North
CTRattlesnake
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,568
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #451 on: March 01, 2016, 10:21:32 PM »


And in CO as well.
Logged
cowboys5xsbs
Rookie
**
Posts: 76
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #452 on: March 01, 2016, 10:21:45 PM »

It's so confusing every website even the AP is saying hillary but the counties make no sense in MN
Logged
Illiniwek
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,910
Vatican City State



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #453 on: March 01, 2016, 10:22:07 PM »

How is this glitch universal? Its just stupid...
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #454 on: March 01, 2016, 10:22:28 PM »

It looks like Sanders is crushing Clinton in MN, and he's in good shape in CO. I know that winning CO, MN, and OK doesn't make up for losing the others, but if he wins them by a lot (looks like he'll in OK by 10.5 or so), he survives, provided Texas tightens at least a little.
Logged
Zanas
Zanas46
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,947
France


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #455 on: March 01, 2016, 10:25:28 PM »

To be honest, I gave up on Bernie's eventual nomination, and just root for him to bring the Dems to their left, to bring Clinton to be at least vaguely left-wing, and for him to be able to influence the platform at the convention.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,175


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #456 on: March 01, 2016, 10:26:05 PM »

We need to dispel with this fiction that the media doesn't know what they're doing by not calling MA. They know exactly what they're doing. Things look good for Clinton, and I think she'll most likely win but the map isn't like anything I've ever seen, so I can see why they're being careful here.

And they're doing something a little more scientific than "George, have you seen this map before? Who won that time?"

Well yeah, but my point is the demographics of this race aren't like any previous race, which makes it hard to call when it's relatively close.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #457 on: March 01, 2016, 10:26:52 PM »

CNN updated, Sanders crushing in Minnesota.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #458 on: March 01, 2016, 10:28:06 PM »

Clinton leading in Denver Sad
Sanders can't catch a break in cities.
Logged
The Free North
CTRattlesnake
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,568
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #459 on: March 01, 2016, 10:29:15 PM »

Shame Bernie wont pull it out in MA

5 states would look decent for him.
Logged
YPestis25
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,376


Political Matrix
E: -4.65, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #460 on: March 01, 2016, 10:30:00 PM »

Shame Bernie wont pull it out in MA

5 states would look decent for him.

Yeah. At least it's not an embarrassing night for him though.
Logged
/
darthebearnc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,367
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #461 on: March 01, 2016, 10:30:12 PM »

NYT - Sanders leading in Colorado 52-46 and Minnesota 59-41.

It's a shame he won't carry MA, but good news otherwise.
Logged
defe07
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 961


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #462 on: March 01, 2016, 10:30:19 PM »

Bernie is expected to win some "bernie friendly" states coming up. But the ones voting in a few weeks seem to be hard. I think if he can win 2 and make the other 2 competitive, ir would be a good night for him! Smiley
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #463 on: March 01, 2016, 10:30:47 PM »

Fox News projects Clinton wins Massachusetts.
Logged
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,956
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #464 on: March 01, 2016, 10:31:42 PM »

Sanders up big in MN, Sanders up decent in Colo. We could take both.

I just feel if Sanders had dumped SC earlier & focused on Mass (The Boston area), we could have had 5 wins.

The media projected only VT win for Sanders & if that was the case, Clinton would have had a 400-450 delegate lead, killing Sanders.

Sanders' worst states, the South (apart from 1-2 more coming) are almost over. I think this is the BEST Possible result for him apart from Mass
Logged
YPestis25
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,376


Political Matrix
E: -4.65, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #465 on: March 01, 2016, 10:32:18 PM »

Fox News projects Clinton wins Massachusetts.

Dang. Congrats Clinton supporters. It was a hard fought race there.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,525
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #466 on: March 01, 2016, 10:32:33 PM »

I feel like Massachusetts is going to be a lot like Iowa. Boston is almost done and still a lot of Sanders area out there. I'm predicting a very narrow Clinton win.
Logged
Illiniwek
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,910
Vatican City State



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #467 on: March 01, 2016, 10:32:53 PM »

Fox News projects Clinton wins Massachusetts.

Dang. Congrats Clinton supporters. It was a hard fought race there.

You can put it on the board....yes!
Logged
The Free North
CTRattlesnake
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,568
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #468 on: March 01, 2016, 10:34:10 PM »

Sanders up big in MN, Sanders up decent in Colo. We could take both.

I just feel if Sanders had dumped SC earlier & focused on Mass (The Boston area), we could have had 5 wins.

The media projected only VT win for Sanders & if that was the case, Clinton would have had a 400-450 delegate lead, killing Sanders.

Sanders' worst states, the South (apart from 1-2 more coming) are almost over. I think this is the BEST Possible result for him apart from Mass

Thats the only silver lining for Sanders.

The Southern states are basically done and he has shown he can in the Caucuses and do well pretty much everywhere outside of the Confederacy.

Logged
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,956
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #469 on: March 01, 2016, 10:35:20 PM »

Clinton's Mass lead down to 26K from 29K, still won't make a huge difference. Solid lead none-the-less

Clinton leads Boston around 18K & Newton 16K, this area gave her the state. Smart strategy.

Congrats Clinton supporters on Mass
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #470 on: March 01, 2016, 10:35:44 PM »

Holding my breath for Colorado...


I feel like Massachusetts is going to be a lot like Iowa. Boston is almost done and still a lot of Sanders area out there. I'm predicting a very narrow Clinton win.

It might end up being within 2 points, but probably not closer than that.
Logged
/
darthebearnc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,367
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #471 on: March 01, 2016, 10:36:16 PM »

Alright, well we lost MA, but I trust there's still good news upcoming in CO and MN.

Especially happy about CO, which is a closed caucus.
Logged
Sorenroy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,701
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -5.91

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #472 on: March 01, 2016, 10:37:06 PM »

I feel like Massachusetts is going to be a lot like Iowa. Boston is almost done and still a lot of Sanders area out there. I'm predicting a very narrow Clinton win.

68% reporting statewide, 95% reporting in Boston. All the other major cities in MA that the NYT has indicated on their maps have fully reported except for Worcester, which has no results in. Sanders (probably) wont overtake Clinton, but it will (hopefully) tighten up from the 3.4% lead she has there now.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #473 on: March 01, 2016, 10:38:35 PM »

OK, this is bad. Hillary seems to coming back in the Denver area... Sad
Logged
Joe Biden is your president. Deal with it.
diskymike44
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,831


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #474 on: March 01, 2016, 10:39:28 PM »

Lol there's 2 guys going at it on CNN now.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23 24 ... 30  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.059 seconds with 13 queries.