MI-NBC News/Marist: Clinton+17, Trump+19
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 06:29:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  MI-NBC News/Marist: Clinton+17, Trump+19
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Author Topic: MI-NBC News/Marist: Clinton+17, Trump+19  (Read 6359 times)
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,956
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: March 08, 2016, 09:03:30 PM »

Well Sanders may lose this, but +17, Can we call this garbage?

MSM has been bad to Sanders!
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,511
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: March 08, 2016, 09:12:08 PM »

How in the hell could all these polls have been so wrong?  Did Clinton supporters in the state believe them, and got complacent as a result? 
Logged
Fubart Solman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,697
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: March 09, 2016, 02:05:45 AM »

How in the hell could all these polls have been so wrong?  Did Clinton supporters in the state believe them, and got complacent as a result? 

I saw something in the results thread that said it's illegal to call cell phones for polling in Michigan. Take that with a grain of salt. I didn't see a source attached to it at the time.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: March 09, 2016, 02:22:59 AM »

These numbers are of likely voters.

The registered voter numbers show a slightly closer race: 52-44.

That somehow reinforces the argument that Sanders does much better with high turnout.

See NH, MI etc.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: March 09, 2016, 11:34:12 AM »

These numbers are of likely voters.

The registered voter numbers show a slightly closer race: 52-44.

That somehow reinforces the argument that Sanders does much better with high turnout.

See NH, MI etc.

But even 52-44 was a huge miss.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.