NY-Siena: Sanders beats GOP by a bigger margin than Clinton (in her home state)

[Tender Branson]

Clinton or Sanders would both beat every Republican candidate in a head-to-head contest in the general election, the poll showed. Sanders would beat all Republicans by 19 to 37 percentage points. Clinton would beat all Republicans by 7 to 25 percentage points, with Kasich giving her the toughest run.

Registered Democrats outnumber Republicans by a 2 to 1 margin in New York. No Republican presidential candidate has won the general election in New York since Ronald Reagan in 1984, and it isn't likely to happen this year, the poll showed.

The Siena poll of 800 New York voters was conducted Feb. 28 to March 3, and released six weeks before New York holds its presidential primary election, on April 19. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.1 percent.

http://www.syracuse.com/state/index.ssf/2016/03/poll_trump_clinton_hold_commanding_leads_among_new_york_voters.html

[Cruzcrew]

What about the specific head to Head matchups

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Ouch, Hillary beating Kasich by only 7 points is a bad sign.

[ElectionAtlas]

New Poll: New York President by Siena Research Institute on 2016-03-03

Summary: D: 57%, R: 34%, U: 9%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

[Skye]

Clinton 56
Rubio 35

Clinton 58
Cruz 33

Clinton 57
Trump 34

Clinton 49
Kasich 42

Sanders 58
Rubio 32

Sanders 63
Cruz 26

Sanders 57
Trump 33

Sanders 54
Kasich 35

Clinton 42
Bloomberg 26
Trump 25

Sanders 42
Bloomberg 28
Trump 24

[pbrower2a]

New York, Siena:


Clinton 56 - Rubio 35
Clinton 58 - Cruz 33
Clinton 57 - Trump 34
Clinton 49 - Kasich 42

Sanders 58 - Rubio 32
Sanders 63 - Cruz 29
Sanders 57 - Trump 33
Sanders 54 - Kasich 35

https://www.siena.edu/assets/files/news/SNY0316N_Crosstabs.pdf

[Ebsy]

The only matchups that matter, Clinton-Trump and Sanders-Trump, are basically the same. New York is not going to be seriously threatened this cycle.

[The Free North]

Bloomberg would only get 5% they said....

[Wiz in Wis]

Ouch, Hillary beating Kasich by only 7 points is a bad sign.

Uh, no it's not.

Kasich won't be the nominee. Even if he was, his numbers would tumble. I'm constantly amazed by people who seem to be totally oblivious to the fact that candidates that are unknown/unattacked do better than candidates who have total name recognition.

[Maxwell]

Bloomberg would only get 5% they said....

He would - because he'd get approximately 0% in the South.

[President Johnson]

Just don't get it why Bernie is doing better than Hillary in almost every poll against the Republicans. The only Republican, I think, he would win against is Rafael. I simply can't imagine that Bernie wins against TRUMP, Kasich or even Marco.

[Wiz in Wis]

Just don't get it why Bernie is doing better than Hillary in almost every poll against the Republicans. The only Republican, I think, he would win against is Rafael. I simply can't imagine that Bernie wins against TRUMP, Kasich or even Marco.

Sanders hasn't been attacked by the GOP for 30 years. That will happen, he would fall in the polls.

[Fargobison]

I wish this would put an end to me having to listen to Trump fanboys telling me he can carry an NY but sadly they are so deluded I doubt it will. 

[IceSpear]

Let's stop pretending to be deeply surprised when candidates who aren't attacked perform much better in the polls.

[standwrand]

These Sanders general election polls crack me up.

[P123]

Lol, as if any Republican would come within 15points of the Democrats in New York. Either Hillary or Sanders would win by +20 easily. Reminds me of 2012 when people said Obama would win tennessee.