OH-PPP: Clinton and Sanders lead all Republicans except Kasich
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 06:17:42 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  OH-PPP: Clinton and Sanders lead all Republicans except Kasich
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: OH-PPP: Clinton and Sanders lead all Republicans except Kasich  (Read 2265 times)
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 10, 2016, 03:34:53 PM »

Clinton 44, Rubio 41
Clinton 45, Trump 40
Clinton 45, Cruz 40
Kasich 52, Clinton 37

Sanders 42, Rubio 38
Sanders 44, Trump 40
Sanders 44, Cruz 38
Kasich 54, Sanders 34

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2016/03/likely-portmanstrickland-race-starts-as-toss-up.html
Logged
EliteLX
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,035
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.64, S: 0.85

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 10, 2016, 03:39:36 PM »

Good lord John's constituents sure do like the guy to have margins like that in contrast with others.

Yet another reason he's most qualified out of the current GOP field.
Logged
Chaddyr23
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 479
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.19, S: -5.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 10, 2016, 03:52:23 PM »

Two things:

Sanders and Clinton perform pretty much the same here, I had an expectation that he'd do a bit better than Sec. Clinton here.

Also, Kasich's very popular but might not be popular enough to win the state in the primary.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,858
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 10, 2016, 04:19:09 PM »

What a strong Favorite Son effect! For someone with a strong positive image in his state, it is worth typically 10%. Of course this is not typical. If the other Republican candidates are seen as extreme, incompetent, or otherwise objectionable, there may be more than a Favorite Son effect. 
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,427
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 10, 2016, 04:24:11 PM »

Trump cant win OH, he really isnt electable
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,858
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 10, 2016, 04:41:43 PM »

Trump cant win OH, he really isnt electable

That is what the poll show. Sanders just isn't well known in Ohio -- but Trump is well known in Ohio. Sanders can get to 50% of the vote far more easily than can Trump, Cruz, or Rubio. Kasich is a different story; he could win the state yet lose nationally. (But he seems to have some chance to win in Virginia, which he would also have to win. I simply have too few polls on Kasich, and that forces me to choose between giving a chance on someone that I know little about and giving no chance on something that I know all too well.

Logged
Higgs
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,581


Political Matrix
E: 6.14, S: -4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 10, 2016, 05:04:41 PM »

Good lord John's constituents sure do like the guy to have margins like that in contrast with others.

Yet another reason he's most qualified out of the current GOP field.

And he'd make a great president too. It's a shame he has zero chance of becoming the nominee.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,427
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 10, 2016, 05:16:47 PM »

This OH poll shows:  


From the PA poll conducted a week ago:


Maybe just coincidence or an outlier, but very interesting nonetheless. I don't expect PA to vote much to the left of the nation in 2016.

PA numbers sounds reasonable because in a neutral year, even AL Gore won state by four. But, Ohio numbers seem more far fetched, Pa is a D+2,state

In a neutral year, Pa is the bellweather.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,458
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 10, 2016, 07:24:41 PM »

Sanders and Clinton perform pretty much the same here, I had an expectation that he'd do a bit better than Sec. Clinton here.

Keep in mind that it's PPP.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,704


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 11, 2016, 05:04:00 PM »

Sanders and Clinton perform pretty much the same here, I had an expectation that he'd do a bit better than Sec. Clinton here.

PPP is rather biased. They have taken money from Hillary's SuperPAC and try their hardest to make Hillary look good.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,427
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 11, 2016, 05:15:21 PM »

In the Fall, we have to look at the Ohio and CO numbers more carefully, as it is now, OH numbers are meaningless. But, CO, Clinton was leading by 10, thats good news.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 13 queries.