OH-PPP: Portman-Strickland race a tossup at this point
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 01:07:49 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 Senatorial Election Polls
  OH-PPP: Portman-Strickland race a tossup at this point
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: OH-PPP: Portman-Strickland race a tossup at this point  (Read 1798 times)
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 10, 2016, 03:37:28 PM »

Ted Strickland (D): 41%
Rob Portman (R, inc.): 40%

Rob Portman (R, inc.): 42%
P.G. Sittenfeld (D): 30%

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2016/03/likely-portmanstrickland-race-starts-as-toss-up.html
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,718
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 10, 2016, 03:39:11 PM »

Sittenfeld being only 12 points behind is interesting to say the least.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,708
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 10, 2016, 04:22:52 PM »

Tight race, hope Strickland pulls it out.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 10, 2016, 04:54:24 PM »

Sittenfeld being only 12 points behind is interesting to say the least.
Not at all.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,847
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2016, 04:36:28 AM »

Sittenfeld being only 12 points behind is interesting to say the least.
Not at all.

Last time they polled the race I think Portman was winning 50/16 or something close to that.
It seems that TRUMP and SCOTUS obstruction are doing him no favors.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,416


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 11, 2016, 04:41:42 AM »

This strikes me as a race that's liable to get nationalized.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,708
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 11, 2016, 09:13:15 AM »
« Edited: March 11, 2016, 09:21:33 AM by Da-Jon »

The fact that Strickland is very competetive in Ohio, tells you something . That, Trump is a bad fit for Appalachian. Virginia or OH is resistant to the GOP trend of the ruby red South
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,637
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 11, 2016, 10:40:48 AM »

Strickland is very old, fundraising poorly, and his administration was much less popular than the current Republican administration. Democrats in Ohio have a higher floor than Republicans, but it's very difficult for me to see Strickland pulling this out bar some sort of national meltdown. (Which...is clearly a possible event in this election cycle, so we'll see).

That, Trump is a bad fit for Appalachian.

WHAT?!
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,708
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 11, 2016, 10:50:00 AM »

Clearly Dems are targetting PA, OH, NH in case they lose NV.  But EVERY poll has had Trump losing ground in VA /OH and Strickland leading. I wouldnt underestimate Trump's poor standing in OH.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 11, 2016, 06:31:21 PM »

Strickland is very old, fundraising poorly, and his administration was much less popular than the current Republican administration. Democrats in Ohio have a higher floor than Republicans, but it's very difficult for me to see Strickland pulling this out bar some sort of national meltdown. (Which...is clearly a possible event in this election cycle, so we'll see).

That, Trump is a bad fit for Appalachian.

WHAT?!

Ed FitzGerald and Lee Fisher beg to differ.
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 23, 2016, 07:27:08 PM »


Agreed. I expect whoever carries Ohio will pull their party's nominee with them.
Logged
RFayette
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,959
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: March 23, 2016, 11:09:50 PM »

Strickland is very old, fundraising poorly, and his administration was much less popular than the current Republican administration. Democrats in Ohio have a higher floor than Republicans, but it's very difficult for me to see Strickland pulling this out bar some sort of national meltdown. (Which...is clearly a possible event in this election cycle, so we'll see).

That, Trump is a bad fit for Appalachian.

WHAT?!

Ed FitzGerald and Lee Fisher beg to differ.

Bob Taft and Mike DeWine?  I mean, both Dems and GOP have the opportunity to landslide with good circumstances.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 11 queries.