AZ - Opinion Savvy: Trump with a double-digit lead
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 07:24:29 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  AZ - Opinion Savvy: Trump with a double-digit lead
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: AZ - Opinion Savvy: Trump with a double-digit lead  (Read 1444 times)
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 21, 2016, 01:16:44 PM »

Trump 46%
Cruz 33%
Kasich 17%
Undecided 4%

http://www.fox5atlanta.com/news/110984766-storyw

Better than nothing, I guess.
Logged
Fargobison
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,692


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2016, 01:18:58 PM »

Weird that early voting is so much closer, would have predicted the opposite.
Logged
/
darthebearnc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,367
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2016, 01:22:00 PM »

Makes sense.
Logged
yankeesfan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,148
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2016, 01:32:23 PM »

Weird that early voting is so much closer, would have predicted the opposite.

I'm not 100% convinced those early voting numbers are accurate.  Remember the Florida poll that had Rubio up 44/27 in early voting, but in reality it was the exact opposite?
Logged
Donnie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 351


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2016, 01:48:12 PM »

Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,754
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 21, 2016, 02:16:06 PM »

Rubio was winning the early vote in pretty much all the polls early on, but as it got closer to primary day, Trump started to take the lead even in the early vote. But his strength was among people who voted on election day (as opposed to Louisiana where Trump cleaned up the early vote and Cruz beat him on election day - it was a bad weekend for him a few days earlier).
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 21, 2016, 02:18:43 PM »

The gap should be much narrower than that.

I predict both Trump and Cruz at around 40% (+/- 3%).
Logged
OkThen
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 273


Political Matrix
E: -2.32, S: 0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 21, 2016, 02:19:07 PM »

Not too much evidence of Opinion Savvy clearly overstating Trump support (sometimes yes, sometimes no.) They were pretty accurate in Florida though.
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,637
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 21, 2016, 02:44:34 PM »

Well, every other polling firm has trump in the mid-30s here (which wasn't the case in FL), so either they know something no one else does or they're simply off.
Logged
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 21, 2016, 03:05:39 PM »

Well, every other polling firm has trump in the mid-30s here (which wasn't the case in FL), so either they know something no one else does or they're simply off.

To be fair, there aren't many polls to which we can compare this one.  The only recent one, IIRC, is the Merill poll, which had a tiny sample size and high undecideds.  And Trump still led by 12%.
Logged
Donnie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 351


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 21, 2016, 04:26:54 PM »

Not too much evidence of Opinion Savvy clearly overstating Trump support (sometimes yes, sometimes no.) They were pretty accurate in Florida though.

In Georgia too.
Logged
DemPGH
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,755
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: March 21, 2016, 04:32:52 PM »

Three recent polls have DJT at 12%, 13%, and 14%. One of them, I think the one that has him at 12%, had what seemed to me like a pretty small sample size, although I'm not an expert on that.

But this is good. If he bags AZ before a lull that shifts back to NY, NJ, PA, et. al., I think he's in superb shape (it would be a little like a football game where one team gets ahead by about 16, 17 points in the second half - in other words, a little separation). The reactionaries would have to screw him over at the convention as the best way to derail him if he doesn't in fact get the 1237 or 1240 or whatever. If he gets AZ, I think it's the event horizon.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: March 22, 2016, 09:27:57 AM »

Weird that early voting is so much closer, would have predicted the opposite.

Could the early voters among Republicans be disproportionately Mormon?
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,637
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: March 23, 2016, 06:08:35 PM »

Well, every other polling firm has trump in the mid-30s here (which wasn't the case in FL), so either they know something no one else does or they're simply off.

They did know something no one else did. Credit to OpinionSavvy where credit is due, for being the only ones who were able to (nearly) nail trump's final percentage in the state. The remaining polling here, conducted by Merrill and whatnot, was total garbage.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: March 23, 2016, 06:23:35 PM »

Well, every other polling firm has trump in the mid-30s here (which wasn't the case in FL), so either they know something no one else does or they're simply off.

They did know something no one else did. Credit to OpinionSavvy where credit is due, for being the only ones who were able to (nearly) nail trump's final percentage in the state. The remaining polling here, conducted by Merrill and whatnot, was total garbage.

Did TRUMP really do a number on you last night? Tongue
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,637
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: March 23, 2016, 06:31:31 PM »

Well, every other polling firm has trump in the mid-30s here (which wasn't the case in FL), so either they know something no one else does or they're simply off.

They did know something no one else did. Credit to OpinionSavvy where credit is due, for being the only ones who were able to (nearly) nail trump's final percentage in the state. The remaining polling here, conducted by Merrill and whatnot, was total garbage.

Did TRUMP really do a number on you last night? Tongue

Eh. Last night was the first time this entire cycle I've seen a meaningful trump over-performance of the polling average. The low amount and low quality of polling in Arizona means that it didn't completely come out of left field (and the fact that this poll forecast it kept it in the back of my mind), but yeah, I really didn't expect 47% for him, especially after that random local newspaper in Prescott f**ked up their exit poll and said Cruz was on track for a landslide. Arizona wasn't a necessary win for the anti-trump forces, but a win by Cruz would've meant that yesterday would've basically guaranteed a contested convention, and I'd gotten my hopes up for that.

Being a Hillary supporter, though, you must be rather used to polling under-performances at this point Tongue
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: March 23, 2016, 06:38:03 PM »

Well, every other polling firm has trump in the mid-30s here (which wasn't the case in FL), so either they know something no one else does or they're simply off.

They did know something no one else did. Credit to OpinionSavvy where credit is due, for being the only ones who were able to (nearly) nail trump's final percentage in the state. The remaining polling here, conducted by Merrill and whatnot, was total garbage.

Did TRUMP really do a number on you last night? Tongue

Eh. Last night was the first time this entire cycle I've seen a meaningful trump over-performance of the polling average. The low amount and low quality of polling in Arizona means that it didn't completely come out of left field (and the fact that this poll forecast it kept it in the back of my mind), but yeah, I really didn't expect 47% for him, especially after that random local newspaper in Prescott f**ked up their exit poll and said Cruz was on track for a landslide. Arizona wasn't a necessary win for the anti-trump forces, but a win by Cruz would've meant that yesterday would've basically guaranteed a contested convention, and I'd gotten my hopes up for that.

Being a Hillary supporter, though, you must be rather used to polling under-performances at this point Tongue

The problem for Cruz was that even if Trump did underperform, Rubio getting a solid chunk of the early vote was almost certainly going to preclude the possibility of an upset.

As for Hillary, she's outperformed the polls in like half the states that have voted so far. lol
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,637
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: March 23, 2016, 06:44:01 PM »

Well, every other polling firm has trump in the mid-30s here (which wasn't the case in FL), so either they know something no one else does or they're simply off.

They did know something no one else did. Credit to OpinionSavvy where credit is due, for being the only ones who were able to (nearly) nail trump's final percentage in the state. The remaining polling here, conducted by Merrill and whatnot, was total garbage.

Did TRUMP really do a number on you last night? Tongue

Eh. Last night was the first time this entire cycle I've seen a meaningful trump over-performance of the polling average. The low amount and low quality of polling in Arizona means that it didn't completely come out of left field (and the fact that this poll forecast it kept it in the back of my mind), but yeah, I really didn't expect 47% for him, especially after that random local newspaper in Prescott f**ked up their exit poll and said Cruz was on track for a landslide. Arizona wasn't a necessary win for the anti-trump forces, but a win by Cruz would've meant that yesterday would've basically guaranteed a contested convention, and I'd gotten my hopes up for that.

Being a Hillary supporter, though, you must be rather used to polling under-performances at this point Tongue

The problem for Cruz was that even if Trump did underperform, Rubio getting a solid chunk of the early vote was almost certainly going to preclude the possibility of an upset.

True, I suppose, though I don't think the phenomenon of a candidate dropping out right before Arizona had happened in the recent past, so the high Rubio vote also came as a bit of a surprise.

As for Hillary, she's outperformed the polls in like half the states that have voted so far. lol

I haven't really been following the D side at all, since the R side is so compelling this year, but I feel like all I've read about is how Bernie outperformed in Michigan and came close in Nevada etc., etc. I was very surprised by how poorly he did in Ohio, though. Obviously I'm aware that it doesn't matter much and that Hillary is on track to win the nomination with room to spare.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.054 seconds with 12 queries.