Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 18, 2017, 01:53:57 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  Presidential Election Process (Moderator: muon2)
| | |-+  Why do the Democrats...
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Why do the Democrats...  (Read 839 times)
Fritz
JLD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5620
United States


View Profile
« on: April 06, 2016, 12:07:22 pm »
Ignore

have so many more delegates than the Republicans (like 2 to 1)?
Logged

Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3214
United States


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 06, 2016, 12:15:13 pm »
Ignore

Superdelegates are part of it.  Other than that, probably just different rules.
Logged

Endorsements:
AL-SEN: A GOP or Libertarian write-in, #NoMooreRoy
AZ-SEN: Matt Salmon
FL-SEN: Rick Scott
IN-SEN: Mike Braun
MI-SEN: Bob Young
MO-SEN: Josh Hawley
MT-SEN: Matt Rosendale
OH-SEN: Josh Mandel
PA-SEN: Lou Barletta
TN-SEN: Marsha Blackburn
WV-SEN: Evan Jenkins
FL-GOV: Adam Putnam
OH-GOV: Jon Husted
TX-GOV: Greg Abbott
WI-GOV: Scott Walker
NH-GOV: Stefany Shaheen
NH-02: Annie Kuster
136or142
Adam T
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3710
View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 06, 2016, 12:20:55 pm »
Ignore

have so many more delegates than the Republicans (like 2 to 1)?

I don't know why but this has always been the case since at least the Primary process was opened up for the 1972 Presidential election, so if you want to find out the reason you probably have to go back to when the rules were being rewritten for the Democratic Party Presidential nomination process by George McGovern and his fellow commissioners following the 1968 convention.   At one time there were even half delegates which I first heard about in 1984 at the age of 13 and that concept totally confused me at the time and brought up images from horror movies.
Logged



Proposed phrase for a radical centrist: Empathy for all sides, commitment to none.
Desroko
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 351
View Profile
« Reply #3 on: April 06, 2016, 12:48:40 pm »
Ignore

have so many more delegates than the Republicans (like 2 to 1)?

I don't know why but this has always been the case since at least the Primary process was opened up for the 1972 Presidential election, so if you want to find out the reason you probably have to go back to when the rules were being rewritten for the Democratic Party Presidential nomination process by George McGovern and his fellow commissioners following the 1968 convention.   At one time there were even half delegates which I first heard about in 1984 at the age of 13 and that concept totally confused me at the time and brought up images from horror movies.

Half delegates were a thing for over a hundred years. It let state parties reward more loyalists, and to pack the convention hall. They've been disappearing pretty steadily over the last few decades - on the Dem side only Dems Abroad awarded half delegates this cycle. 
Logged
136or142
Adam T
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3710
View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 06, 2016, 12:51:11 pm »
Ignore

have so many more delegates than the Republicans (like 2 to 1)?

I don't know why but this has always been the case since at least the Primary process was opened up for the 1972 Presidential election, so if you want to find out the reason you probably have to go back to when the rules were being rewritten for the Democratic Party Presidential nomination process by George McGovern and his fellow commissioners following the 1968 convention.   At one time there were even half delegates which I first heard about in 1984 at the age of 13 and that concept totally confused me at the time and brought up images from horror movies.

Half delegates were a thing for over a hundred years. It let state parties reward more loyalists, and to pack the convention hall. They've been disappearing pretty steadily over the last few decades - on the Dem side only Dems Abroad awarded half delegates this cycle. 

Thanks, I did not know that.  When I first heard them mentioned in 1984 I believe my first thought was 'I wouldn't be cut in half even to get to vote in a Presidential nominating convention.'
Logged



Proposed phrase for a radical centrist: Empathy for all sides, commitment to none.
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines