Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 20, 2019, 07:29:25 pm
News: 2020 Presidential Predictions (General) are now active.

  Atlas Forum
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls (Moderators: AndrewTX, Likely Voter)
  MD-Monmouth: Clinton up 25
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: MD-Monmouth: Clinton up 25  (Read 518 times)
Bevinevitable
IceSpear
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31,511
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 21, 2016, 01:18:02 pm »

http://www.monmouth.edu/assets/0/32212254770/32212254991/32212254992/32212254994/32212254995/30064771087/e92b6e3e-96b0-401c-972f-1130cafd1370.pdf

Clinton 57
Sanders 32
Logged
Congressman Dwarven Dragon
Wulfric
Atlas Politician
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21,846
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.68, S: 1.22

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2016, 01:21:39 pm »

Clinton leading big in state dominated by blaxicans. News at 11.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17,936
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.63, S: -6.13

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2016, 01:22:43 pm »

Seems like a believable result.
Logged
Holmes
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11,729
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 21, 2016, 02:02:24 pm »

Clinton leading big in state dominated by blaxicans. News at 11.

lol the blaxicasians.
Logged
Bevinevitable
IceSpear
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31,511
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 21, 2016, 02:05:47 pm »

It's not over yet, Sanders can still win by 90 points in PA and CA!!!111!

I hope CA does the right thing next cycle and moves their primary to Super Tuesday so that zombie campaigns will no longer be able to use this talking point.
Logged
Joshua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1,484
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 21, 2016, 02:08:45 pm »

It's not over yet, Sanders can still win by 90 points in PA and CA!!!111!

I hope CA does the right thing next cycle and moves their primary to Super Tuesday so that zombie campaigns will no longer be able to use this talking point.

Our Secretary of State is a ditz, but is pretty much a shoo in for a second term in 2018.

California can't promise to do anything rational about this.
Logged
Congressman Dwarven Dragon
Wulfric
Atlas Politician
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21,846
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.68, S: 1.22

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 21, 2016, 02:50:30 pm »

^^ Wasn't CA on ST in 2008? What was the rational behind changing that?

Clinton leading big in state dominated by blaxicans. News at 11.

lol the blaxicasians.

It's pretty clear that Sanders would be the presumptive nominee in a hypothetical "whites-only" primary.



Logged
Lief 🐋
Lief
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 40,599
Dominica


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 21, 2016, 03:00:15 pm »

Wow Wulfric giving Tender Branson a run for the money in being the most racist poster!
Logged
Holmes
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11,729
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 21, 2016, 03:06:00 pm »

^^ Wasn't CA on ST in 2008? What was the rational behind changing that?

Clinton leading big in state dominated by blaxicans. News at 11.

lol the blaxicasians.

It's pretty clear that Sanders would be the presumptive nominee in a hypothetical "whites-only" primary.

So the Klan?
Logged
Bevinevitable
IceSpear
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31,511
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 21, 2016, 03:07:36 pm »

^^ Wasn't CA on ST in 2008? What was the rational behind changing that?

Clinton leading big in state dominated by blaxicans. News at 11.

lol the blaxicasians.

It's pretty clear that Sanders would be the presumptive nominee in a hypothetical "whites-only" primary.

Yes, he'd be a shoo in in a Republican primary.

But on a serious note, I remember someone posting a breakdown of the white vote here a while ago and it was actually surprisingly close. I wonder what it looks like now.
Logged
/
darthebearnc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7,378
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: April 21, 2016, 03:09:09 pm »

^^ Wasn't CA on ST in 2008? What was the rational behind changing that?

Clinton leading big in state dominated by blaxicans. News at 11.

lol the blaxicasians.

It's pretty clear that Sanders would be the presumptive nominee in a hypothetical "whites-only" primary.

So the Klan?

haha funny you are smart
Logged
Holmes
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11,729
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 21, 2016, 03:11:47 pm »

^^ Wasn't CA on ST in 2008? What was the rational behind changing that?

Clinton leading big in state dominated by blaxicans. News at 11.

lol the blaxicasians.

It's pretty clear that Sanders would be the presumptive nominee in a hypothetical "whites-only" primary.

So the Klan?

haha funny you are smart

I don't know what else would fall under Wulfric's definition of a "whites-only" party or organization.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length
Logout

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC